Professor of KTA Prot. Alexiy Dobosh: I agree to condemn Lviv Church Council after the Pope denounces Brest Union

On March 9, at the 7th annual conference "Student Science at the Theological School," Professor of the Kiev Theological Academy of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, presented his report on the historical events that occurred in 1946 in Ukraine – "Lviv Church Council of 8-10 March, 1946, in the Context of Ecclesiastical Historical Realities."

On March 9, at the 7th annual conference "Student Science at the Theological School", Professor of the Kiev Theological Academy of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, presented his report on the historical events that occurred in 1946 in Ukraine – "Lviv Church Council of 8-10 March, 1946, in the Context of Ecclesiastical Historical Realities."

In his report, Prot. Alexiy Dobosh discussed the issues of collaboration of the Greek Catholic Church and the nationalist factions of the OUN and the UPA, an effort of the Greek-Catholic leaders to join the Orthodox Church in Ukraine to the Catholic Church and other aspects of the Greek Catholics in the first half of the 20th century, in the context of which the Lviv Church Council of 1946 can be assessed.

"As to whether to ask for forgiveness or appeal to the Patriarch of Moscow to condemn the Lviv Church Council of 1946, I will express my personal position – I agree to initiate the collection of signatures to the Patriarch of Moscow to condemn the Lviv Council of 1946, but only after the Pope, in the spirit of Havana solutions, condemns not the abstract methods of uniatizm but a particular creation of the Union of Brest in 1596, " the professor of KTA said.

The Lviv Church Council is assessed in a controversial manner in modern Ukraine and so far has been the subject for heated discussions between the Greek Catholics and the Ukrainian Orthodox Christians.



Read also

Vyshyvanka instead of Heaven: When national symbolism overshadows Ascension

The head of the OCU placed the Ascension of the Lord and Vyshyvanka Day on the same level, called the embroidered shirt “sacred,” and asked Christ for help in war. We examine what is wrong with this rhetoric.

Enthronement of Patriarch Shio: neither pro-Moscow nor pro-Phanar but Georgian

Constantinople representatives did not come to the enthronement, but developed vigorous activity the following week. What lies behind this and what to expect from the new Georgian Primate.

Reservation via renunciation: How UOC clergy are being driven into a trap

The authorities are offering UOC clergy a stark ultimatum: acknowledge yourselves as the “Moscow Patriarchate” and receive exemption from mobilization – or refuse, and the draft offices will come for you. Here is why this is a trap.

Why Hieromartyr Macarius is not a standard-bearer of the OCU

The head of the OCU turns a 15th-century saint into an instrument of his propaganda. We refute another speculation by Serhiy Dumenko.

What should Orthodoxy expect from Georgia's new Patriarch Shio?

Metropolitan Shio has become Patriarch. A new era has begun for the Georgian Church. What will it look like? And what could it mean for the Orthodox world as a whole? Let us try to understand.

DESS expert review overturned by court: why this matters more than it seems

The appellate court did not halt the process of banning the UOC. But it did recognize as defective the very document on which the authorities built their campaign against the Church.