Wounded in the Head: another Lie of the Kiev Patriarchate Priests Exposed

On August 26, on his Facebook page, a certain Pavel Podobed posted "breaking news" about "a sexton of the UOC", who allegedly committed an assault on a priest of the Kiev Patriarchate. This "sensation" was picked up by several sites, using almost the same text and photos: "In Korsun, Cherkassy region, a sexton of the local church belonging to the UOC - MP, Mikhail Lysenko, attacked with a knife Rostislav Bylo, a priest of the UOC-KP." The latter said that wounds on his head, supposedly made with a knife, constitute "evidence" of the assault of the sexton.

Such sites like apostrophe.com.u a, pohlyad.com, lb.ua, novostiua.net and others without bothering to check the facts and the information, for example, at the doctor’s or with the police, published doubtful material aimed at inciting sectarian division.

In order to refute the obvious lie, it was enough for the journalists to communicate with an allegedly "attacking" parishioner of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, who was not even a church minister, and verify the information on the nature of the injure got by the KP priest, Rostislav Bylo.

And here a true sensation immerged. As it was investigated by Anatoly Shariy, the priest of the KP was not a victim, but an initiator of a drunken brawl, during which he, being intoxicated, together with his co-believers on the patriarchate, attacked the parishioner of the UOC. The latter decided not to inflate the scandal and slander on Facebook.

But the cleric of the KP apparently decided to use his "wounds", received apparently from falling on broken glass, as evidence of an attack of a local parishioner of the church, presented to the media as a priest of the UOC. So, on a drunken head, such "sensations" are born, fanning aggression against the confession unwanted by the Kyiv Patriarchate. 

Read also

Pentarchy: Why the Phanar meeting could become a talk about Ukraine

Patriarch Bartholomew has invited three ancient Patriarchates to the Phanar. Two of them have not recognized the OCU – and the November 30 meeting may become an opportunity to return to the discussion about Ukraine.

Elder Gabriel (Bunge) on UOC, Sviatohirsk martyrdom and judgment of history

A candid interview with the Swiss elder about the killing at the Sviatohirsk Lavra, Patriarch Bartholomew’s alleged admission, holiness and betrayal.

Why the UOC should not have to apologize for a “Moscow” Liturgy

Patriarch Bartholomew commemorates Patriarch Kirill, and OCU clergy concelebrate with him – and that is considered normal. But when Metropolitan Pimen serves in Jerusalem, it is branded “treason.” Where is the logic?

"Don’t let this death be silenced": global reaction to murder in Sviatohirsk

Primates of Local Churches call for the murderers of monk Varsonofiy to be found and speak of the atmosphere of hatred toward the UOC that made the crime possible.

We rob you blind while you smash churches

When a country is being robbed of money meant for bomb shelters and body armor, it urgently needs someone else to blame. The UOC has been cast as the scapegoat.

Can a recording pray?

The “OCU service” performed to a phonogram at the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra prompts reflection not only on the permissibility of this practice, but on the very meaning of worship.