Wounded in the Head: another Lie of the Kiev Patriarchate Priests Exposed

On August 26, on his Facebook page, a certain Pavel Podobed posted "breaking news" about "a sexton of the UOC", who allegedly committed an assault on a priest of the Kiev Patriarchate. This "sensation" was picked up by several sites, using almost the same text and photos: "In Korsun, Cherkassy region, a sexton of the local church belonging to the UOC - MP, Mikhail Lysenko, attacked with a knife Rostislav Bylo, a priest of the UOC-KP." The latter said that wounds on his head, supposedly made with a knife, constitute "evidence" of the assault of the sexton.

Such sites like apostrophe.com.u a, pohlyad.com, lb.ua, novostiua.net and others without bothering to check the facts and the information, for example, at the doctor’s or with the police, published doubtful material aimed at inciting sectarian division.

In order to refute the obvious lie, it was enough for the journalists to communicate with an allegedly "attacking" parishioner of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, who was not even a church minister, and verify the information on the nature of the injure got by the KP priest, Rostislav Bylo.

And here a true sensation immerged. As it was investigated by Anatoly Shariy, the priest of the KP was not a victim, but an initiator of a drunken brawl, during which he, being intoxicated, together with his co-believers on the patriarchate, attacked the parishioner of the UOC. The latter decided not to inflate the scandal and slander on Facebook.

But the cleric of the KP apparently decided to use his "wounds", received apparently from falling on broken glass, as evidence of an attack of a local parishioner of the church, presented to the media as a priest of the UOC. So, on a drunken head, such "sensations" are born, fanning aggression against the confession unwanted by the Kyiv Patriarchate. 

Read also

Bishop and secular justice

Is Metropolitan Tychikos of Paphos entitled to turn to a civil court? Greek presbyter and theologian Anastasios Gotsopoulos analyzes the canons for UOJ in Greece .

Why Lviv residents once defended “Muscovite” Christmas

Today yet another pretext has been invented to destroy Orthodoxy. It is called “not a Ukrainian tradition.” But what actually constitutes tradition in Ukraine?

Why the UOC is not Russian, and its expulsion from churches is unlawful

The authorities have no legal grounds to label the UOC as “Russian.” Therefore, all expulsions of UOC believers from their churches in favor of the OCU constitute a clear violation of their right to freedom of religion.

A diplomatic ultimatum? What was actually said to Epifaniy at the Phanar

Patriarch Bartholomew’s address on January 6, 2026 is the first public warning to Serhiy Dumenko. And, perhaps, the last.

Why the persecution of a Holosiiv Orthodox school is a shot at our future

The Prosecutor General’s Office and the SBU have opened a criminal case against the administration of the Orthodox school at the Holosiiv Monastery in Kyiv. Why this is a fight against the country’s future.

Two Christmases: How Ukrainian authorities divide people by calendar

When a celebration of faith turns into a tool of political struggle, ordinary people suffer.