Wounded in the Head: another Lie of the Kiev Patriarchate Priests Exposed
On August 26, on his Facebook page, a certain Pavel Podobed posted "breaking news" about "a sexton of the UOC", who allegedly committed an assault on a priest of the Kiev Patriarchate. This "sensation" was picked up by several sites, using almost the same text and photos: "In Korsun, Cherkassy region, a sexton of the local church belonging to the UOC - MP, Mikhail Lysenko, attacked with a knife Rostislav Bylo, a priest of the UOC-KP." The latter said that wounds on his head, supposedly made with a knife, constitute "evidence" of the assault of the sexton.
Such sites like apostrophe.com.u
In order to refute the obvious lie, it was enough for the journalists to communicate with an allegedly "attacking" parishioner of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, who was not even a church minister, and verify the information on the nature of the injure got by the KP priest, Rostislav Bylo.
And here a true sensation immerged. As it was investigated by Anatoly Shariy, the priest of the KP was not a victim, but an initiator of a drunken brawl, during which he, being intoxicated, together with his co-believers on the patriarchate, attacked the parishioner of the UOC. The latter decided not to inflate the scandal and slander on Facebook.
But the cleric of the KP apparently decided to use his "wounds", received apparently from falling on broken glass, as evidence of an attack of a local parishioner of the church, presented to the media as a priest of the UOC. So, on a drunken head, such "sensations" are born, fanning aggression against the confession unwanted by the Kyiv Patriarchate.
Read also
Is Islam to shape the future? What politicians and religious leaders imply
Public deference toward Muslims is becoming increasingly noticeable around the world. Why is there more attention paid to them than to the Christian majority? And what does this all mean?
Why did no one come to Filaret's funeral?
The absence of representatives of other Churches at Filaret's funeral is a demonstrative ignoring of the OCU.
Ilia and Filaret: One era, one magnitude, two different destinies
Both lived extraordinarily long lives. Both carried immense weight in the Church. Both were granted a rare place in history. One became the father of his people – the other, the face of schism. Why did it happen this way?
"Monasticism" in the OCU: between staff shortage and reputational crises
Why there are no monks in the OCU, and rare tonsures are accompanied by scandals.
The Patriarch of Georgia and the Pope of Rome
The Greek editorial board of UOJ reflects on the actions of the late Patriarch Ilia during his meeting with the Pope of Rome.
A warning for the OCU: Where negative identity leads
From the standpoint of social psychology, the OCU and its supporters are making one strategic mistake – they are building their identity on negation. What does that mean, and where does it lead?