Wounded in the Head: another Lie of the Kiev Patriarchate Priests Exposed
On August 26, on his Facebook page, a certain Pavel Podobed posted "breaking news" about "a sexton of the UOC", who allegedly committed an assault on a priest of the Kiev Patriarchate. This "sensation" was picked up by several sites, using almost the same text and photos: "In Korsun, Cherkassy region, a sexton of the local church belonging to the UOC - MP, Mikhail Lysenko, attacked with a knife Rostislav Bylo, a priest of the UOC-KP." The latter said that wounds on his head, supposedly made with a knife, constitute "evidence" of the assault of the sexton.
Such sites like apostrophe.com.u
In order to refute the obvious lie, it was enough for the journalists to communicate with an allegedly "attacking" parishioner of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, who was not even a church minister, and verify the information on the nature of the injure got by the KP priest, Rostislav Bylo.
And here a true sensation immerged. As it was investigated by Anatoly Shariy, the priest of the KP was not a victim, but an initiator of a drunken brawl, during which he, being intoxicated, together with his co-believers on the patriarchate, attacked the parishioner of the UOC. The latter decided not to inflate the scandal and slander on Facebook.
But the cleric of the KP apparently decided to use his "wounds", received apparently from falling on broken glass, as evidence of an attack of a local parishioner of the church, presented to the media as a priest of the UOC. So, on a drunken head, such "sensations" are born, fanning aggression against the confession unwanted by the Kyiv Patriarchate.
Read also
Interview for UOJ with a former OCU cleric – key takeaways
The words of a former OCU cleric are valuable precisely because they offer an insider’s view, free of bias. How does the OCU live today, and how do its own clergy see its future?
Broken windows theory: Why sharp polemics destroy the Church
Recently, we have seen how the authors of some Telegram channels, among whom are UOC clergy, allow themselves to make offensive statements toward the church leadership.
On the eve of the trial, or the UOC without Kyiv Metropolia
On the eve of a court session that may outlaw the Kyiv Metropolia of the UOC, it is worth reflecting on how the Church might respond.
What Filioque omission at celebrations of Nicaea Council anniversary means
The omission of Filioque in Nicaea and Phanar is not something new, and certainly does not imply any particular development in Orthodoxy-Papism relations.
All will be persecuted: what did Apostle Paul mean?
Today, when the Church is being persecuted in Ukraine – temples seized, bishops jailed, and believers considered second-class citizens – it makes sense to think: can it be otherwise?
Theology of the OCU: Do Christians and Jews have one Messiah?
A theologian of the OCU, in a dialogue with a Jewish theologian, stated that we have the same Messiah and that Christianity is Judaism 2.0. Why is it untrue, and why propagate such a claim?