Wounded in the Head: another Lie of the Kiev Patriarchate Priests Exposed
On August 26, on his Facebook page, a certain Pavel Podobed posted "breaking news" about "a sexton of the UOC", who allegedly committed an assault on a priest of the Kiev Patriarchate. This "sensation" was picked up by several sites, using almost the same text and photos: "In Korsun, Cherkassy region, a sexton of the local church belonging to the UOC - MP, Mikhail Lysenko, attacked with a knife Rostislav Bylo, a priest of the UOC-KP." The latter said that wounds on his head, supposedly made with a knife, constitute "evidence" of the assault of the sexton.
Such sites like apostrophe.com.u
In order to refute the obvious lie, it was enough for the journalists to communicate with an allegedly "attacking" parishioner of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, who was not even a church minister, and verify the information on the nature of the injure got by the KP priest, Rostislav Bylo.
And here a true sensation immerged. As it was investigated by Anatoly Shariy, the priest of the KP was not a victim, but an initiator of a drunken brawl, during which he, being intoxicated, together with his co-believers on the patriarchate, attacked the parishioner of the UOC. The latter decided not to inflate the scandal and slander on Facebook.
But the cleric of the KP apparently decided to use his "wounds", received apparently from falling on broken glass, as evidence of an attack of a local parishioner of the church, presented to the media as a priest of the UOC. So, on a drunken head, such "sensations" are born, fanning aggression against the confession unwanted by the Kyiv Patriarchate.
Read also
Who will tell a bishop he is wrong?
Why is confidence in one’s own rightness so easily mistaken for spiritual growth – and why is this conversation not only about bishops?
“Want to eat sausage? Go ahead!”: Why OCU is doing away with fasting
Sausage during the Dormition Fast, milk during the Nativity Fast, “everyone sets their own rules.” Oikonomia presupposes a norm from which exceptions may be made. Here, the norm itself is nixed.
Scandal in Lviv: Why it is pointless for the UOC to prove its patriotism
Metropolitan Filaret gave Lviv a building for a rehabilitation center for wounded soldiers. Yet “patriots” demanded an explanation as to why a UOC bishop was present at its opening.
How the authorities are trying to destroy UOC abroad
Ukrainian communities across Europe are being accused of espionage and “Russian influence.” The evidence? Holding church services, helping refugees, working with children, and singing Ukrainian Christmas carols.
Should the Church be "with the people" or with God?
The authorities do not need patriots – they need the obedient. Why attempts to prove loyalty do not stop the persecution, and how this ended for the Church in the 20th century.
The implications of recognizing Pochaiv Lavra's "affiliation"
DESS has recognized the Pochaiv Lavra as affiliated with the ROC on the grounds that the Lavra belongs to the Kyiv Metropolis of the UOC. This is a step toward banning the monastery. But it is also a template that will be applied further.