Wounded in the Head: another Lie of the Kiev Patriarchate Priests Exposed

On August 26, on his Facebook page, a certain Pavel Podobed posted "breaking news" about "a sexton of the UOC", who allegedly committed an assault on a priest of the Kiev Patriarchate. This "sensation" was picked up by several sites, using almost the same text and photos: "In Korsun, Cherkassy region, a sexton of the local church belonging to the UOC - MP, Mikhail Lysenko, attacked with a knife Rostislav Bylo, a priest of the UOC-KP." The latter said that wounds on his head, supposedly made with a knife, constitute "evidence" of the assault of the sexton.

Such sites like apostrophe.com.u a, pohlyad.com, lb.ua, novostiua.net and others without bothering to check the facts and the information, for example, at the doctor’s or with the police, published doubtful material aimed at inciting sectarian division.

In order to refute the obvious lie, it was enough for the journalists to communicate with an allegedly "attacking" parishioner of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, who was not even a church minister, and verify the information on the nature of the injure got by the KP priest, Rostislav Bylo.

And here a true sensation immerged. As it was investigated by Anatoly Shariy, the priest of the KP was not a victim, but an initiator of a drunken brawl, during which he, being intoxicated, together with his co-believers on the patriarchate, attacked the parishioner of the UOC. The latter decided not to inflate the scandal and slander on Facebook.

But the cleric of the KP apparently decided to use his "wounds", received apparently from falling on broken glass, as evidence of an attack of a local parishioner of the church, presented to the media as a priest of the UOC. So, on a drunken head, such "sensations" are born, fanning aggression against the confession unwanted by the Kyiv Patriarchate. 

Read also

Authorities vs UOC: Does Yelensky no longer believe in Zelensky?

The government's campaign to destroy the UOC seems to have reached its logical conclusion, but we do not see this conclusion. Why?

Resounding emptiness: why OCU churches remain without parishioners

On the New Style Dormition, the main feast of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, the OCU has to bring parishioners by buses. Why don't parishioners come there on their own?

The country that blocks the road to God

We analyze why the authorities are banning religious processions and why this will lead to tragic consequences for the country.

Dumenko in a TSN interview: Servant of the people or Culture Ministry ally?

What the head of the OCU, Serhiy (Epifaniy) Dumenko, said – and what he carefully avoided saying – in his TSN interview. His words reveal much about what he truly believes.

Church and state: Lessons from history for the present day

From Peter's reforms to the Revolution of 1917: how state dependence affected the Russian Church – and what lessons the UOC should draw from this today.

Does Patriarch Bartholomew call for “sacred unity” with Allah and Brahman?

In his address to the World Council of Religions, the head of Phanar outlined the problems of humanity and the method of their solution. Quite unusual for the "head of Orthodoxy".