How TV channels earn their ratings on religious black-wash

Gastronomic lust of modern viewers has reached its meticulousness peak now. Therefore, it’s not an easy task even for popular TV channels to retain million ratings.

In the eternal pursuit of exclusive things, certain mass media instead of teaching their viewers to enjoy really high-quality journalist product, stuff up their air-time with half-made products being a mixture of pseudo-investigations and distorted facts. And, of course, “sancta sanctorum” of the television industry is continual and scrupulous work targeted against evident opponents of the channel’s policy. In a word, some are caressed, others – aggressed.

As for such giant as 1+1 channel, they seem to have been pushing their meaningful propaganda against the UOC for a long while now, defining its existence as a threat to the whole Ukrainian statehood; therefore, they resort to any means to convince their audience that the UOC and its parishioners are wishy-washy aliens governed by Moscow. This absolute nonsense is being splashed by the 1+1 journalists in their materials.

Another investigation and another portion of skillfully cooked up lie. In the “Dengi” (Money) program which was launched on 21 March, journalists dared carry out a really audacious investigation. However, it was not the investigation and attempt to expose avid clergymen that appeared audacious, but the work of the journalist, who had frequently concealed actualities merely for the sake of the desired “picture”.



Shameful chronicle of one week: how the OCU was born

Exarchs under escort, a call from the operations room, and 36 votes for Epifaniy: what a member of the Phanar delegation revealed about the 2018 "Council".

Can UOC eparchies be dissolved before court ruling on Metropolia?

DESS is launching separate proceedings against UOC eparchies, monasteries, and institutions while the case involving the Kyiv Metropolia is still pending.

Two murders, one silence

Zelensky condemned the killing of a Catholic priest in Poland the very same day. A month earlier, a UOC monk was murdered at the Sviatohirsk Lavra – and the president has remained silent ever since.

A bow to Phanar? Why did UOC academy congratulate Constantinople’s exarch?

A delegation from the Kyiv Theological Academy congratulated the Phanar’s exarch, who has remained silent about the persecution of the UOC. Who authorized this gesture, and why did even OCU supporters fail to appreciate it?

“De-Moscowize” for unity: Shevchuk’s recipe for bringing Ukrainians together

The head of the UGCC assures that internal division threatens the country's existence, while simultaneously calling to fight against the "wrong" ones. Is this cognitive dissonance or something more?

A parody of an argument: Defending a UOC bishop in response to a Phanar archon