Dark Patriarch. Truth about Filaret


The film features a life path of the “patriarch” of the biggest schism ever in the Ukrainian Orthodoxy, from his being “a Ukrainian-phobic clergyman, loyal to the Soviet power, and opponent of the church autocephaly to splitting the Church and becoming a radical nationalist”.

“Behind the curtains of his words about patriotism Filaret skillfully diverts attention from the fact he was long ago thrown out of the Church and currently ranks as a secular man – Mikhail Denisenko. His “Kiev Patriarchate”, respectively, is a non-canonical structure which is recognized by none of the Domestic Orthodox Churches, which is devoid of God’s grace leading to salvation”, as the film annotation states.

The film authors wonder how a person, who was involved in a number of improper deeds, managed to produce impact on such a considerable amount of Ukrainian believers and regular citizens.



The film features a life path of the “patriarch” of the biggest schism ever in the Ukrainian Orthodoxy, from his being “a Ukrainian-phobic clergyman, loyal to the Soviet power, and opponent of the church autocephaly to splitting the Church and becoming a radical nationalist”.

“Behind the curtains of his words about patriotism Filaret skillfully diverts attention from the fact he was long ago thrown out of the Church and currently ranks as a secular man – Mikhail Denisenko. His “Kiev Patriarchate”, respectively, is a non-canonical structure which is recognized by none of the Domestic Orthodox Churches, which is devoid of God’s grace leading to salvation”, as the film annotation states.

The film authors wonder how a person, who was involved in a number of improper deeds, managed to produce impact on such a considerable amount of Ukrainian believers and regular citizens.

Read also

Ukraine’s religious survey: measuring faith or measuring narratives?

A recent survey by the Rating Group paints a reassuring picture of Ukraine’s religious landscape. Yet a closer look at the numbers suggests something far less encouraging – both for religion and for the unity of Ukrainian society.

Children of one schism: How Kyiv Patriarchate became Phanar's unpaid bill

From the standpoint of Phanar’s own logic, Nikodym’s “ordinations” should be more canonical than Epifaniy’s – not less.

Lights on? The meltdown over “Godfighters of Ukraine” website

They felt no fear when churches were seized, when the Church was outlawed, or when hatred was whipped up against millions of believers. Yet they suddenly became alarmed when the website “Godfighters of Ukraine” appeared. Why?

The throne of Paphos: succession or spiritual adultery?

The Metropolitan of Paphos was removed without a clear accusation or trial, and his see has already been given to another. Why believers and theologians are speaking of a canonical wound and “spiritual adultery.”

"Spiritual strength" built on blood: The truth about the Ukrainian Pantheon

The Ukrainian authorities are creating what they call a “place of spiritual strength for the nation.” But can genuine spirituality be built upon the cult of figures associated with Nazism, pogroms, and internecine violence?

UOC-KP after Filaret: Church, brand or refuge for marginals?

The Kyiv Patriarchate shows signs of active life: it accepts overseas parishes and hands out "ordinations." What is this: revival or legitimization of individuals with a troubled past?