Dark Patriarch. Truth about Filaret


The film features a life path of the “patriarch” of the biggest schism ever in the Ukrainian Orthodoxy, from his being “a Ukrainian-phobic clergyman, loyal to the Soviet power, and opponent of the church autocephaly to splitting the Church and becoming a radical nationalist”.

“Behind the curtains of his words about patriotism Filaret skillfully diverts attention from the fact he was long ago thrown out of the Church and currently ranks as a secular man – Mikhail Denisenko. His “Kiev Patriarchate”, respectively, is a non-canonical structure which is recognized by none of the Domestic Orthodox Churches, which is devoid of God’s grace leading to salvation”, as the film annotation states.

The film authors wonder how a person, who was involved in a number of improper deeds, managed to produce impact on such a considerable amount of Ukrainian believers and regular citizens.



The film features a life path of the “patriarch” of the biggest schism ever in the Ukrainian Orthodoxy, from his being “a Ukrainian-phobic clergyman, loyal to the Soviet power, and opponent of the church autocephaly to splitting the Church and becoming a radical nationalist”.

“Behind the curtains of his words about patriotism Filaret skillfully diverts attention from the fact he was long ago thrown out of the Church and currently ranks as a secular man – Mikhail Denisenko. His “Kiev Patriarchate”, respectively, is a non-canonical structure which is recognized by none of the Domestic Orthodox Churches, which is devoid of God’s grace leading to salvation”, as the film annotation states.

The film authors wonder how a person, who was involved in a number of improper deeds, managed to produce impact on such a considerable amount of Ukrainian believers and regular citizens.

Read also

The Bible and the Third Temple: What lies behind the U.S.–Israel war in Iran

How the religious doctrine of American evangelicals shapes U.S. policy in the Middle East.

Why are the authorities and the OCU “reopening” Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra?

Ukrainian officials and the OCU keep taking Lavra churches away – yet they “open” the caves. What is the farce here, and what do they really need it for?

Religious “advocacy” of the authorities is inherited from Soviet times

The Ukrainian authorities delegate religious leaders to the West to give the impression that there is no persecution of the Church in the country. The USSR government did exactly the same. We illustrate this with examples.

What does the government want from Metropolitan Arseniy?

The state is trying to force Metropolitan Arseniy either to move to the OCU or to agree to an exchange.

“Canonical mathematics” from Constantinople, or where OCU bishops came from

Why there is no foundation for dialogue with the OCU – and why Constantinople’s “canonical mathematics” yields no results.

A word as a crime: What the court found Metropolitan Theodosiy guilty of

The court delivered its verdict on Metropolitan Theodosiy of Cherkasy: guilty. Of what? We examine the judgment.