UOJ requested OSCE to assess draft law on church raiding
The Union of Orthodox Journalists forwarded a letter to Andrey Dzubenko – a national program coordinator of the OSCE Project Coordinator in Ukraine. We are waiting for a reply from the organization on whether the draft law #4128 violates human rights.
An odious draft law has been already reviewed by the Profile Parliamentary Committee and recommended for adoption in the first reading. It foresees the following amendments to the current law “On Freedom of Conscience and Religious Organizations”:
Firstly, “affiliation of an individual to a religious community is determined by their self-identification, as evidenced by participation of an individual in the religious life of a particular community.” It means any person, who decided to be faithful and attends a church even once a year, can influence the life of the religious community.
Secondly, pursuant to the recommended amendment to the Law, the life of the community is supposed to be regulated by the majority’s opinion. Still, taking account of the first paragraph, this majority may be formed up by the people who are actually far from real religious life.
Members of the Committee on Cultural and Spiritual Property assure the adoption of the draft law will comply with the recommendations of the Venice Commission and the OSCE.
However, there is an Opinion of the Main Scientific and Expert Department of the Verkhovna Rada, according to which draft law #4128 runs counter to article 9 of the Convention on Human Rights Protection. Besides, the European Court of Human Rights has already determined to defend the religious communities’ rights to independently establish their composition.
Experts and human rights activists also view the draft law as an attempt to intrude into activities of religious communities that can make church raiding legitimate and exacerbate religious animosity.
The UOJ therefore requests the OSCE to answer the questions below:
- Were there any recommendations for adopting draft law #4128?
- Is it really necessary at the moment to adopt draft law #4128 in the current edition?
- Does the draft law meet the requirements of the Convention on Human and Believers’ Rights Protection?
- What are the implications of the norms of this legislative innovation?
- Does the OSCE intend to give its recommendations to the Ukrainian authorities on the matter in question?
The UOJ is looking forward to the response and continues to monitor the developments.
Read also
In Pasika, Transcarpathia, priest defects to OCU while community remains in UOC
In the village of Paseka in Transcarpathia, believers discussed the future fate of their church.
In Sumy, Presentation Church of UOC damaged by shelling
In the Sumy Eparchy, the walls and fence of the Presentation Church were damaged as a result of shelling, but divine services continue.
Ukraine loses almost 98% of cases at European Court of Human Rights
According to the ECtHR’s 2025 report, nearly all complaints against Ukraine end with findings of human rights violations.
UOC Chancellor on Kyiv Council decision targeting UOC: Obvious lawlessness
Metropolitan Anthony said the document adopted by the Kyiv Regional Council violates the Constitution, interferes with freedom of religion, and exceeds the body’s authority.
In Finland, Constantinopolitan Church hierarch convicted of fraud
A Finnish court found the former archbishop of the Constantinople Patriarchate guilty of manipulating state subsidies and committing financial violations.
His Beatitude: Pure faith is the only path to soul salvation
On the Sunday of the Triumph of Orthodoxy, the Primate of the UOC urged the faithful not to tailor faith to human reasoning and passions, and reminded them of the significance of the Ecumenical Councils.