Radicals used threats to force deputies of Belgorod-Dnestrovsky City Council to allocate the land plot for the UOC KP

Deputies of Belgorod-Dnestrovsky city council under the pressure of radicals allocated two land plots for the Kiev Patriarchate.

At the 13th city council session deputies voted for the land plot allocation on the city outskirts, which had been solicited by KP bishop Marc for a long time. However, it seemed not enough to the fighters of “Azov” battalion and they began to put pressure on the deputies demanding to allocate another land plot.

According to the reference source, “Azov” fighters warned to keep the deputies inside the session hall until they would make the decision suitable for the KP community. Eventually the deputies voted for allocation of another land plot in the center of the city. Earlier it was planned to build a Wedding Palace on this site, according to the design project.

There were not any representatives of the UOC at the session.


Deputies of Belgorod-Dnestrovsky city council under the pressure of radicals allocated two land plots for the Kiev Patriarchate.

At the 13th city council session deputies voted for the land plot allocation on the city outskirts, which had been solicited by KP bishop Marc for a long time. However, it seemed not enough to the fighters of “Azov” battalion and they began to put pressure on the deputies demanding to allocate another land plot.

According to the reference source, “Azov” fighters warned to keep the deputies inside the session hall until they would make the decision suitable for the KP community. Eventually the deputies voted for allocation of another land plot in the center of the city. Earlier it was planned to build a Wedding Palace on this site, according to the design project.

There were not any representatives of the UOC at the session.

Read also

Ukraine’s religious survey: measuring faith or measuring narratives?

A recent survey by the Rating Group paints a reassuring picture of Ukraine’s religious landscape. Yet a closer look at the numbers suggests something far less encouraging – both for religion and for the unity of Ukrainian society.

Children of one schism: How Kyiv Patriarchate became Phanar's unpaid bill

From the standpoint of Phanar’s own logic, Nikodym’s “ordinations” should be more canonical than Epifaniy’s – not less.

Lights on? The meltdown over “Godfighters of Ukraine” website

They felt no fear when churches were seized, when the Church was outlawed, or when hatred was whipped up against millions of believers. Yet they suddenly became alarmed when the website “Godfighters of Ukraine” appeared. Why?

The throne of Paphos: succession or spiritual adultery?

The Metropolitan of Paphos was removed without a clear accusation or trial, and his see has already been given to another. Why believers and theologians are speaking of a canonical wound and “spiritual adultery.”

"Spiritual strength" built on blood: The truth about the Ukrainian Pantheon

The Ukrainian authorities are creating what they call a “place of spiritual strength for the nation.” But can genuine spirituality be built upon the cult of figures associated with Nazism, pogroms, and internecine violence?

UOC-KP after Filaret: Church, brand or refuge for marginals?

The Kyiv Patriarchate shows signs of active life: it accepts overseas parishes and hands out "ordinations." What is this: revival or legitimization of individuals with a troubled past?