Filaret leads his church along the road to nowhere, – UAOC priest
“At present the forcefulness of Filaret in the church ambience of Ukraine arises from his being surrounded by politicians and civil servants. Yet the road along which Filaret leads his church is a bridge to nowhere,” believes the priest.
“UOC KP remains unrecognized, it is allowed to hold worships with neither of the other churches,” underlined the priest. He reported that Patriarch Filaret is also.He explained that Constantinople Patriarch Bartholomew does not recognize canonicity of the UOC KP and Patriarch Filaret either, the latter being anathematized at the beginning of the 1990s. “According to ecclesiastic canons, only the Russian Orthodox Church can remove this anathema”, says father Stephan.
Administration methods of the UOC-KP chief Patriarch Filaret are “bolshevist, authoritarian”, told senior priest of St. Nickolay Naberezhnyi UAOC church protopriest Stephan (Yaremchuk) to News of Ukraine.
“At present the forcefulness of Filaret in the church ambience of Ukraine arises from his being surrounded by politicians and civil servants. Yet the road along which Filaret leads his church is a bridge to nowhere,” believes the priest.
“UOC KP remains unrecognized, it is allowed to hold worships with neither of the other churches,” underlined the priest. He reported that Patriarch Filaret is also.He explained that Constantinople Patriarch Bartholomew does not recognize canonicity of the UOC KP and Patriarch Filaret either, the latter being anathematized at the beginning of the 1990s. “According to ecclesiastic canons, only the Russian Orthodox Church can remove this anathema”, says father Stephan.
Read also
Should the Church be "with the people" or with God?
The authorities do not need patriots – they need the obedient. Why attempts to prove loyalty do not stop the persecution, and how this ended for the Church in the 20th century.
The implications of recognizing Pochaiv Lavra's "affiliation"
DESS has recognized the Pochaiv Lavra as affiliated with the ROC on the grounds that the Lavra belongs to the Kyiv Metropolis of the UOC. This is a step toward banning the monastery. But it is also a template that will be applied further.
Forgiving one's enemies: betrayal, foolishness, or faithfulness to Christ?
War is a moment of truth. It places people in circumstances where obeying Christ's commandments becomes especially difficult. Yet it is precisely in such moments that it becomes clear who truly belongs to Christ – and who does not.
Avraamiy and the void: Why the OCU dismissed its "abbot of the Lavra"
The OCU’s “abbot of the Lavra” began building direct ties with Ukraine’s top leadership – and was promptly dismissed.
Pantheon instead of monastery: For whom Lavra’s Far Caves were “opened”?
The authorities have ceremonially “opened” the Far Caves that they themselves closed three years ago. Is monastic life returning? No. A very different future is being prepared for the Lavra.
Why did Zelensky receive OCU’s “Lavra abbot”?
A strike on the Dormition Cathedral, a national pantheon, and a deferential smile – how Avraamiy Lotysh went from an obscure figure to a man granted access to the highest office in the land.