The war of Uniates against the UOC: a white klobuk – a black soul
Why do the icons of the Uniate churches depict Yanukovich, Yushchenko, Putin, Kuzma and the UGCC head Shevchuk?
Why does the patriotic UGCC serve in the "language of the invader"?
Why does Greek-Catholic leader Sviatoslav Shevchuk call Taras Shevchenko a Uniate?
Why do Uniates mimic the Orthodox Church stating that:
- the UGCC has Orthodox dogmatism,
- the UGCC is an heir of the Kiev Orthodoxy,
- Catholicism does not contradict the purity of the Orthodox faith,
- Prince Vladimir, having baptized Rus in the Orthodox faith, made the European choice.
And finally, why did exactly the Uniate MPs turn out to be the authors of anti-Orthodox bills 4128, 4511 and even the initiators of the address to the Ecumenical Patriarch on legalization of the UOC-KP?
Read also
Why Lviv residents once defended “Muscovite” Christmas
Today yet another pretext has been invented to destroy Orthodoxy. It is called “not a Ukrainian tradition.” But what actually constitutes tradition in Ukraine?
Why the UOC is not Russian, and its expulsion from churches is unlawful
The authorities have no legal grounds to label the UOC as “Russian.” Therefore, all expulsions of UOC believers from their churches in favor of the OCU constitute a clear violation of their right to freedom of religion.
A diplomatic ultimatum? What was actually said to Epifaniy at the Phanar
Patriarch Bartholomew’s address on January 6, 2026 is the first public warning to Serhiy Dumenko. And, perhaps, the last.
Why the persecution of a Holosiiv Orthodox school is a shot at our future
The Prosecutor General’s Office and the SBU have opened a criminal case against the administration of the Orthodox school at the Holosiiv Monastery in Kyiv. Why this is a fight against the country’s future.
Two Christmases: How Ukrainian authorities divide people by calendar
When a celebration of faith turns into a tool of political struggle, ordinary people suffer.
The Tychikos case: Can a bishop defend his rights in a secular court?
An analysis of the developments in Cyprus suggests that a bishop can suffer not for violating the canons, but for observing them.