Cross Procession 2017: campaign against the Church is launched!
ZIK, Obozrevatel, a lot of Internet publications and even the whole of the Ministry of Culture of
Ukraine joined the campaign for making fakes and inciting hatred towards the UOC.
Is it a coincidence, or an attempt to repeat the scenario of 2016, when the entire hysteria unfolded in
media against the Church?
Read also
Religious “advocacy” of the authorities is inherited from Soviet times
The Ukrainian authorities delegate religious leaders to the West to give the impression that there is no persecution of the Church in the country. The USSR government did exactly the same. We illustrate this with examples.
What does the government want from Metropolitan Arseniy?
The state is trying to force Metropolitan Arseniy either to move to the OCU or to agree to an exchange.
“Canonical mathematics” from Constantinople, or where OCU bishops came from
Why there is no foundation for dialogue with the OCU – and why Constantinople’s “canonical mathematics” yields no results.
A word as a crime: What the court found Metropolitan Theodosiy guilty of
The court delivered its verdict on Metropolitan Theodosiy of Cherkasy: guilty. Of what? We examine the judgment.
Why do authorities use national security as a pretext to destroy the Church?
By now, there has been enough time to discern the logic behind the destruction of Orthodoxy in Ukraine. What does this strategy entail, and what part is assigned to the OCU in it?
Exarchate of Constantinople for the UOC: a solution or a trap?
What lies behind the talk of a “third way” for the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and how might consent to a new structure under the omophorion of the Phanar ultimately end?