Govorun: Without state pressure, “Unification Council” could hardly happen
Archimandrite Kirill (Govorun). Photo: LB.ua
Without pressure from the state and personally President Petro Poroshenko, the “Unification Council” would hardly have taken place, and Filaret would not have made concessions and compromises. This point of view was expressed by the theologian, professor of the Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles, Archimandrite Kirill (Govorun) in an interview with LB.ua.
“The process of state participation in the formation of a new church structure was ambivalent,” said Govorun. “I do not assess right now how correct this is from the point of view of the constitutional norm on the separation of Church and state, although this can also be said. But speaking about the observance of procedures, one thing is clear: without pressure from the state and personally President Poroshenko, the Council would hardly have taken place. And Metropolitan Filaret would not have made concessions and compromises, the most significant of which is the refusal to participate in the election of primate but for the pressure of the state.”
He stressed that the "head" of the OCU was also elected under pressure from the state, but the state showed indifference to the quality of the church life itself, which led to "side effects".
“The pressure had a negative side, a side effect. The interference of the state at that time in the affairs of the Church led to the violation of conciliar procedures. And this makes itself felt not because the state has now stepped aside from church affairs but because the time has come for side effects. They would be inevitable even if Poroshenko had been re-elected for a second term. The reason is the quality of church life, to which the state was indifferent,” the archimandrite explained.
According to him, the presidential administration showed a certain passivity, in connection with which “the representation of the entire Ukrainian Orthodox community in the OCU is significantly narrowed,” which is the main reason for the OCU to remain unrecognized by other Orthodox Churches.
“For Poroshenko’s team, it was important to hold a Council, form a new church structure with a new name and get the Tomos for it. It seemed to them not so important what quality this structure will be of, how widely represented and inclusive,” explained Govorun.
We recall that Archimandrite Kirill (Govorun) was named among the possible candidates for primacy in the OCU. The Presidential Administration did not include the Archimandrite in the lists of participants in the “Unification Council”, although he specifically flew to Kiev from Los Angeles.
Read also
In Pasika, Transcarpathia, priest defects to OCU while community remains in UOC
In the village of Paseka in Transcarpathia, believers discussed the future fate of their church.
In Sumy, Presentation Church of UOC damaged by shelling
In the Sumy Eparchy, the walls and fence of the Presentation Church were damaged as a result of shelling, but divine services continue.
Ukraine loses almost 98% of cases at European Court of Human Rights
According to the ECtHR’s 2025 report, nearly all complaints against Ukraine end with findings of human rights violations.
UOC Chancellor on Kyiv Council decision targeting UOC: Obvious lawlessness
Metropolitan Anthony said the document adopted by the Kyiv Regional Council violates the Constitution, interferes with freedom of religion, and exceeds the body’s authority.
In Finland, Constantinopolitan Church hierarch convicted of fraud
A Finnish court found the former archbishop of the Constantinople Patriarchate guilty of manipulating state subsidies and committing financial violations.
His Beatitude: Pure faith is the only path to soul salvation
On the Sunday of the Triumph of Orthodoxy, the Primate of the UOC urged the faithful not to tailor faith to human reasoning and passions, and reminded them of the significance of the Ecumenical Councils.