Greek hierarch: Autocephaly of OCU doesn't rule out UOC and Met. Onuphry
Extraordinary meeting of the Bishops’ Council of the Greek Orthodox Church. Photo: romfea.gr
On October 12, 2019, at an extraordinary meeting of the Bishops' Council of the Greek Orthodox Church, Metropolitan Ignatius (Georgakopoulos) of Dimitriades and Almyros, chairman of the Synodal Commission for Orthodox and Inter-Christian Relations, made a report titled “Ukrainian autocephaly and responsibility of the spirit”, Romfea reports.
The document stated that the bestowal of autocephaly to the OCU does not foresee that the UOC, led by His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry of Kiev and All Ukraine, no longer operates in Ukraine: “The granting of autocephaly is a prerogative of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, but it does not deny the essence and presence of Metropolitan Onuphry and the Russian church presence in Ukraine. It does not change its status, it does not concern them, nor does it lead to a split. The Ecumenical Patriarchate does not cease its communion. They broke off the communion with it. The Ecumenical Patriarch continues to make a liturgical mention of Patriarch Kirill.”
As explained, “The Ecumenical Patriarchate acted on duty. <...> He came to solve the problem that could not be solved otherwise. He does so because it is his ministry, this is his duty in Orthodoxy.”
Therefore, says the hierarch, Constantinople continues its relation with the UOC, “but it gives the opportunity to save the souls of Ukrainians who want to be in the Orthodox Church of Ukraine. No one can challenge the right of the Patriarch.”
The report says that the Russian Orthodox Church “cannot offer a solution to the Ukrainian people” and “did not want a dialogue for almost 30 years”, while “the Ecumenical Patriarchate has contributed to this dialogue by supporting efforts.” “After the invasion into Crimea, everything collapsed. Now no one believes that the Russian Church will ever be able to offer a solution to the Ukrainian people. <...> In fact, the Russian Church not only failed to offer a solution, but even then its position regarding the process of preparing the Pan-Orthodox Council was absolutely negative. This was wrong. <...> Their perseverance was terrible,” the bishop writes, emphasizing that the Russian Orthodox Church was not present at the Cretan Council and “denies primacy in the East”.
Metropolitan Ignatius also speaks of the “responsibility assumed by the GOC”: “Whether it is good or bad, granting autocephaly was based not only on intra-church factors. This was due to geopolitical events. I’m sorry that some do not understand what is happening in our time and what responsibility we bear.”
Recall, Phanar hierarchs have repeatedly affirmed that their actions are aimed at the complete unification of Orthodoxy in Ukraine. Archbishop Job (Getcha) stated that the Patriarchate of Constantinople would not create parallel church jurisdiction in Ukraine and also that there should be only one Church in the territory of our state: “According to the canons of the Church, there cannot be two parallel Churches,” noted the hierarch. “If some people can speak out that whoever doesn’t want Ukrainian autocephaly can remain as Russian exarchate whatever, it’s just anti-canonical.”
As reported by the UOJ, on October 12 the official communiqué of the Extraordinary Bishops' Council of the Greek Orthodox Church was published. The Council recognized the “canonical right” of Phanar to grant autocephaly, as well as the privilege of the Primate of the Church of Greece to further deal with the issue of recognition of the Church of Ukraine.
The seven metropolises of the Greek Orthodox Church requested a delay in making their decision on the proposal of Archbishop Ieronymos of Athens and All Greece “to recognize by our Church the autocephaly of the Orthodox Church of the independent Ukrainian Republic,” who considered the proclamation of church autocephaly of Ukraine “extremely beneficial for the Orthodox Church and valuable in strengthening relations between the two autocephalous Orthodox Sister Churches, Great Rus and Ukraine.”
Read also
Kosovo to enact law restricting Serbian Church, experts say
Analysts warn that the new "Law on Foreigners" in Kosovo could restrict the presence of clergy, believers' access to shrines, and increase pressure on the Serbian community.
Congress Speaker: Demand to introduce Sharia law in USA is a serious problem
The Speaker of the House of Representatives stated that there is growing concern in society about attempts to impose Islamic law, which is incompatible with the American Constitution.
UK government introduces restrictions on "anti-Muslim hostility"
UK authorities have adopted a new definition of "Islamophobia" which, according to experts, could provide Muslims with special protection and restrict freedom of speech.
Dumenko brings icon in Church Slavonic to Ministry of Health
Epifaniy presented cardiologists with an Intercession icon, with inscriptions in Church Slavonic, which his structure calls a "sign of the Moscow tradition".
ISIS supporters carries out terrorist attack at anti-Islamic protest in NY
Near the home of New York's Muslim mayor, radicals threw two makeshift bombs at protesters during an anti-Islamic rally.
Hryshchuk: If UOC hands over its church itself, angle grinders aren't needed
An OCU chaplain called on UOC believers to accept the loss of the shrine for the sake of their own "enlightenment".