Should all Orthodox Christians repent for the Volyn Massacre?
Head of the UGCC Sviatoslav Shevchuk. Photo: theukrainians.org
The text contains many beautiful words, but its essence is that the Polish and Ukrainian peoples need to "cleanse historical memory", mutually forgive each other, and reconcile.
Shevchuk prides himself that it is the Catholic Churches that are the initiators of such reconciliation: "Reconciliation between our peoples is a process of healing wounds that both Poles and Ukrainians carry in their souls and consciences to this day." At the same time, the statement says that "reconciliation can only be built on truth and justice."
And here is the question – is it fair that Shevchuk reconciles for the Volyn Massacre on behalf of the entire Ukrainian people?
Let us recall, the massacre was carried out in 1943 by very specific people – members of the OUN-UPA. Yes, the overwhelming majority of them were Uniates, and Shevchuk's involvement here is understandable. But can it be said that the "Ukrainian people" bear responsibility for the tens of thousands of Polish women and children killed by the UPA? Is the conscience of the entire Ukrainian people burdened by this now? Absolutely not, this is a gross manipulation.
What is surprising is not Shevchuk's rhetoric, who tries to stain all Ukrainians with the Volyn Massacre. What is surprising is that the same is done by the exarch of the Phanar, Michael (Anishchenko), who stated that "representatives of all confessions, including Orthodox, should join such initiatives." He claims that "history is a common heritage."
The Volyn Massacre, like any mass killings, is undoubtedly a tragedy. But the overwhelming majority of those involved – both victims and perpetrators – were Catholics.
As regards Orthodox Christians, they undoubtedly need to repent. But there are plenty of reasons for this without the Volyn Massacre.
Read also
Phanar's canonical mathematics in OCU ordinations: when 1×0=1
The Constantinople Church explained why they consider the ordination performed by an impostor and a defrocked priest to be legitimate.
Do Ukrainians without heat and eeectricity really do nothing but rejoice and dance?
The head of the UGCC has repeatedly criticized the U.S. plan for achieving peace. And now he speaks as though Ukrainians are ready to endure the war for as long as necessary – they are being ground down, and yet they do nothing but sing and dance.
When every UOC church in Lviv Region is shut down – is that “freedom of faith”?
In Galicia, the authorities have effectively outlawed the UOC and are hunting down “underground” services – while in the United States they solemnly insist that no one in Ukraine is persecuted for their faith.
Why Epifaniy’s “piety” justifies Patriarch Bartholomew’s hopes
The Phanar is convinced that Dumenko “stands firmly and unshakably on spiritual heights.”
Dumenko’s “dialogue” appeal to the UOC: sincerity or strategy?
If the OCU truly wanted dialogue, it would decide to halt seizures and return what was taken.
Where did the circus go? It was here just yesterday
At an Orthodox Church of Ukraine “service” with Epifaniy (Dumenko) in the seized cathedral in Volodymyr, there are people. But the very next day – without Epifaniy – there are no people.