German Professor: Legitimacy of Churches is not within the state's purview

Dr. Thomas Bremer. Photo: jordanrussiacenter.org
Dr. Thomas Bremer, a renowned Catholic theologian and distinguished professor at WWU Münster in Germany, has stated that Ukrainian authorities have overstepped their bounds by deciding which denomination is the legitimate Orthodox Church in Ukraine. He made this statement in an interview published on the dialogtut.org website.
According to Dr. Bremer, the unwarranted interference of authorities in religious affairs is evidenced by the State Service for Ethnic Policy and Freedom of Conscience conducting a "religious expertise" of the Statute on the Governance of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, as well as a government bill aimed at banning the UOC.
"Due to the new government policy, and specifically due to the 'Conclusion of the Religious Expertise by DESS' (along with Law No. 8371), the state is taking a position on which of the two churches is legitimate. However, this is not its task and not its competence," Dr. Bremer stated.
He added that the termination of the agreement for the use of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra by the UOC is a consequence of this policy.
Professor Bremer noted that Ukraine is essentially still following the Soviet model of religious policy.
"The current law on religious organizations in Ukraine is a modified Soviet law. It was adopted shortly before Ukraine declared independence and was influenced by the idea of restructuring, so it was relatively liberal. However, it contains provisions typical of the Soviet period, such as the requirement for the registration of religious communities or the establishment of an authority responsible for the sphere of religion (similar to the Soviet 'Commissioner for Religious Affairs')," the theologian pointed out.
He is convinced that in a democratic society, religious freedom is a fundamental value and right that should not be violated even in extreme situations, such as during times of war.
"Of course, the state should counteract anyone who threatens its existence, both in times of war and in peacetime. However, it should not violate its own principles in the process. Protecting religious freedom (or any other right) does not occur through its restriction," Thomas Bremer emphasized.
As previously reported by the UOJ, Dr. Bremer believes that Ukrainian authorities have no grounds to ban the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
Read also

“It reeks of political technology,” political analyst on Met. Onuphry case
Zolotaryov believes the authorities are using the case of His Beatitude to distract attention from unfavorable news.
In Chernihiv, court session held over the use of Yeletsky Monastery
The local reserve is attempting to evict the nuns from the convent.
UOC clergy participate in celebrations of Romanian monastery in Putna
“They welcomed us with love — as brothers in faith,” said Father Vitaliy Honchariuk, who was recently severely beaten by militants during an attempted seizure of the Chernivtsi cathedral.
Novynskyi: Authorities have a plan to subjugate UOC without His Beatitude
Protodeacon Vadym Novynskyi believes that a strip of citizenship of the UOC Primate is Zelensky's reaction to the failed seizure in Chernivtsi.
Moldovan hierarch: The country's authorities interfere in church affairs
Archbishop Markell accused the authorities of pressuring the Church and double standards.
Congresswoman to Zelensky: Ban the Church? Then no weapons funding for you
Anna Paulina Luna criticized Zelensky for the persecution of the UOC.