Court rejects appeal to change preventive measure for UOJ journalist
Representatives of the SBU serve suspicion to UOJ journalist. Photo: t.me/SBUkr
On April 8, 2024, a court hearing took place regarding the appeal against the preventive measure for detained UOJ journalist Valeriy Stupnitsky.
According to video materials available to the UOJ, Valeriy Stupnitsky was not brought to the courtroom, which constitutes a gross violation of Ukrainian legislation.
Stupnitsky's lawyer informed the court that the detained journalist has serious health problems, including ischemic heart disease, and the conditions of his detention in pre-trial detention do not even meet minimum standards.
For example, Stupnitsky is held in a cell where the number of detainees exceeds the number of beds they can sleep on. Therefore, the UOJ journalist has to sleep for only 4 hours a day, mainly during the daytime. As a result, he has lost consciousness several times.
Additionally, the lawyer pointed out that the accusations against V. Stupnitsky lack evidentiary basis and cannot be used as evidence of his guilt.
In particular, he is charged with expressing the opinion that people seizing UOC churches are raiders. The prosecution believes that using the word "raiders" in relation to these people incites religious enmity. This is despite the fact that Ukrainian legislation uses this term in relation to illegal seizures of buildings or territories, and criminal cases are opened against those who seize UOC churches.
After the lawyer pointed out that Valeriy Stupnitsky has three children and did not evade the court, the suspect was given the floor via internet connection.
A standard television set was installed in the courtroom without additional sound amplifying equipment. As a result, when Valeriy Stupnitsky connected, almost nothing he said was audible in the courtroom.
Furthermore, Stupnitsky himself, as the defendant, had no opportunity to participate in the court hearing, respond to the accusations, request the court for explanations, and so on, which is illegal.
As a result, the court rejected the lawyer's motion and left Valeriy Stupnitsky in the pre-trial detention center.
Earlier, the UOJ wrote about the charges against Orthodox journalists.
Read also
TRC abducts UOC church rector in Kyrdany village
TThe Territorial Recruitment Center (TRC) promised to release a UOC priest after checking his documents but instead the clergyman was sent to a military unit.
26.6M hryvnias allocated to restore Lavra's Dormition Cathedral
The Lavra Reserve signs a UAH 26.6 million contract to preserve the damaged Dormition Cathedral.
OCU сleric: Even those who think in Russian are outsiders in Ukraine
OCU cleric Ivan Rybaruk called Russian-speaking Ukrainians "outsiders" who, in times of danger, would "grab everything and flee like tumbleweeds."
ROC approves procedure for receiving members of Ukrainian schismatic groups
The ROC Synod has adopted a document governing the reception of communities and clergy from the OCU, UOC-KP, and UAOC.
OCU cleric's church preference poll delivers unexpected results
When an OCU cleric from Rivne asked Ukrainians which Church they preferred, most Threads users who responded chose the UOC.
Reports to SBU of weapons in UOC churches were always false, Novynskyi says
The protodeacon said that under Maliuk, inspections began to be accompanied by public accusations against the Church without evidence.