Stupnitsky: According to SBU's manual, I cannot be accused of treason

Criminal collaboration in conditions of armed aggression. Author: Head of the SBU V. Maliuk. Photo: jurkniga.ua

Criminal collaboration in conditions of armed aggression. Author: Head of the SBU V. Maliuk. Photo: jurkniga.ua

The UOJ journalist Valeriy Stupnitsky stated that he categorically disagrees with the accusations brought against him, particularly of state treason. Explaining his position regarding the recusal of the group of prosecutors due to their biased attitude, Valeriy Stupnitsky personally presented evidence in court to prove his innocence.

Speaking about the accusation of state treason, Valeriy used the definitions of this term by the head of the SBU, Vasyl Maliuk. In the practical guide on criminal-legal assessment and demarcation titled "Criminal Collaboration in Conditions of Armed Aggression", the head of the SBU emphasizes that a mandatory condition for such qualification of accusation should be the fact of committing certain activities in favor of a hostile state together with its representatives. Such representatives exclusively include official individuals of a foreign state, diplomats, intelligence officers, etc.

"I deny that my journalistic activities and those of my colleagues defending the UOC can be considered hostile. And I strongly state that I have never had any acquaintances, contacts, let alone conspiracy with representatives of the aggressor country. I voluntarily provided law enforcement with passwords to all contacts and correspondence in messengers, as well as from my computer," he emphasized.

The UOJ employee added that in the mentioned manual, Maliuk asserts that if there is no foreign recipient in the case, it cannot be considered state treason.

"So, according to the law, there are no grounds to accuse me of state treason," Stupnitsky concluded.

As written by the UOJ, the journalist emphasized in court that the OCU is not a state attribute, and criticizing it is not a crime.

Read also

Shevchuk brings relics of Prince Volodymyr into UGCC Cathedral in Rome

The head of the UGCC claimed that Moscow occupiers had stolen Prince Volodymyr from the Uniates.

OCU calls UOC cross procession “a herd without a single flag or vyshyvanka”

Hryshchuk published yet another text inciting hatred toward UOC believers.

Ombudsman’s Office: We are monitoring investigation of Bancheny Monastery

Information about “possible violations” has already been entered into the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations.

Prayer vigil for His Beatitude held near Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra

According to a priest, the Primate of the UOC is going through a difficult time, and the faithful are supporting him in prayer.

Poroshenko: How many Local Churches have recognized the OCU under Zelensky?

Poroshenko accused Zelensky of failing to support the OCU properly.

UOC сhurch in Zolotyi Kolodiaz village destroyed by Russian shelling

Only ruins remain of the church.