What makes euthanasia dangerous?
Euthanasia. Photo: Sobaka.ru
On the one hand, helping a terminally ill person who is enduring severe pain and suffering to end their life may seem compassionate. However, there are two arguments against euthanasia: one practical and the other theological.
From a practical perspective, the danger of euthanasia lies in its potential for gradual misuse. Today, as an exception, we assist a hopelessly ill and severely suffering person in ending their life with their consent and the agreement of their close relatives. Tomorrow, their consent may no longer be required – first in cases of mental incapacity and later simply based on decisions by relatives or medical personnel. Today, we limit the option of euthanasia to a very small number of severe diagnoses; tomorrow, this list could expand, and the day after, it might suffice for someone to merely express a desire to die, possibly due to despondency or depression. The progressive relaxation of euthanasia criteria seems inevitable. Where could this lead in the end?
While it might still be possible to establish a clear criterion on practical grounds and enshrine it in law (though this offers no guarantees), overcoming theological objections is entirely impossible.
God has given us a simple commandment: "Thou shalt not kill." A person comes into being not by their own will and should not transition to eternity by their own will either. This is God's will. When a person claims for themselves what belongs to God, they place themselves in God's stead. When a person takes another's life, they take away a life given by God, acting against His will. It is impossible to be more merciful than God – even in situations where we cannot comprehend why a terminally ill person suffers. From our human reasoning, it might seem more compassionate to end their suffering. Yet, we only see what is here and now, while God sees everything: earthly and heavenly, temporal and eternal. God loves a person more than their loved ones do – even more than the person loves themselves.
Euthanasia is a rebellion against God, against His providence and His mercy. It is an attempt to replace them with our human judgment and compassion. But if we reject God here on earth, how are we going to live without Him in eternity?
Read also
“There are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USSR”
One of the most disgraceful phenomena in the life of Ukraine’s present-day religious community is its complicity in justifying the crackdown on the UOC.
Why people heroize those who beat TRC
Why does the head of the UGCC publicly call for war until victory, while quietly hiding draft-dodging workers in temples? Why do OCU bloggers delete posts supporting the TRC due to massive hate?
On the long-awaited statements by Oleksandr Usyk
Oleksandr Usyk has declared that he is ready to become president. The only question is – whom does he now see as his voters?
Two weeks of OCU’s “brotherhood” talk to UOC: Any fruits yet?
So this is what the OCU’s “dialogue” looks like. One hand signs “appeals” about brotherhood – the other blesses people with angle grinders.
Potemkin villages of Serhii Dumenko
In Volodymyr, in Cherkasy, and in other UOC cathedrals that were seized – wherever Dumenko comes – his motorcades are shadowed by buses of hired “supporters”. Dumenko leaves – and so do “Potemkin peasants” together with their "vladyka."
Why is the state celebrating the Bolsheviks’ destruction of the Lavra?
There is no logic in the actions of our current authorities. There is only propaganda – crude and malicious – which, under the mask of “patriotism”, can do nothing but poison and inflame hatred.