What makes euthanasia dangerous?
Euthanasia. Photo: Sobaka.ru
On the one hand, helping a terminally ill person who is enduring severe pain and suffering to end their life may seem compassionate. However, there are two arguments against euthanasia: one practical and the other theological.
From a practical perspective, the danger of euthanasia lies in its potential for gradual misuse. Today, as an exception, we assist a hopelessly ill and severely suffering person in ending their life with their consent and the agreement of their close relatives. Tomorrow, their consent may no longer be required – first in cases of mental incapacity and later simply based on decisions by relatives or medical personnel. Today, we limit the option of euthanasia to a very small number of severe diagnoses; tomorrow, this list could expand, and the day after, it might suffice for someone to merely express a desire to die, possibly due to despondency or depression. The progressive relaxation of euthanasia criteria seems inevitable. Where could this lead in the end?
While it might still be possible to establish a clear criterion on practical grounds and enshrine it in law (though this offers no guarantees), overcoming theological objections is entirely impossible.
God has given us a simple commandment: "Thou shalt not kill." A person comes into being not by their own will and should not transition to eternity by their own will either. This is God's will. When a person claims for themselves what belongs to God, they place themselves in God's stead. When a person takes another's life, they take away a life given by God, acting against His will. It is impossible to be more merciful than God – even in situations where we cannot comprehend why a terminally ill person suffers. From our human reasoning, it might seem more compassionate to end their suffering. Yet, we only see what is here and now, while God sees everything: earthly and heavenly, temporal and eternal. God loves a person more than their loved ones do – even more than the person loves themselves.
Euthanasia is a rebellion against God, against His providence and His mercy. It is an attempt to replace them with our human judgment and compassion. But if we reject God here on earth, how are we going to live without Him in eternity?
Read also
On how the OCU scorns its own rent-a-crowd
According to Zoria, the OCU looks down on staged crowds – for them, “what matters is truth, not the number” of parishioners. And yet, for every one of Epifaniy Dumenko’s traveling services, people are bused in by the coachload.
Persecution of UOC and liquidation of UGCC in 1946: Are there parallels?
After the defeat of Nazi Germany and the liberation of Western Ukraine, the leadership of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) initiated negotiations with Soviet authorities concerning the future of its ecclesiastical structure.
On the mobilization of a priest as a sniper
A man who has chosen the path of the priesthood has no right to join the army and take up a weapon. And the very idea of killing another human being is all the more absurd.
On statistics: how many Orthodox, Muslims and Jews we have
Trust in the Razumkov Center's research methods on the topic of Orthodoxy is minimal.
Why helping children with cancer is a threat to state security
We should have long got used to the antics of some MPs, especially those who furiously hate the UOC. But they don't stop surprising us.
Is Ramadan closer to the authorities than Great Lent?
Have Muslims and Jews – who together make up just over one percent of the country’s population – become a privileged class? And yet Ukraine is widely seen as a Christian country.