What makes euthanasia dangerous?
Euthanasia. Photo: Sobaka.ru
On the one hand, helping a terminally ill person who is enduring severe pain and suffering to end their life may seem compassionate. However, there are two arguments against euthanasia: one practical and the other theological.
From a practical perspective, the danger of euthanasia lies in its potential for gradual misuse. Today, as an exception, we assist a hopelessly ill and severely suffering person in ending their life with their consent and the agreement of their close relatives. Tomorrow, their consent may no longer be required – first in cases of mental incapacity and later simply based on decisions by relatives or medical personnel. Today, we limit the option of euthanasia to a very small number of severe diagnoses; tomorrow, this list could expand, and the day after, it might suffice for someone to merely express a desire to die, possibly due to despondency or depression. The progressive relaxation of euthanasia criteria seems inevitable. Where could this lead in the end?
While it might still be possible to establish a clear criterion on practical grounds and enshrine it in law (though this offers no guarantees), overcoming theological objections is entirely impossible.
God has given us a simple commandment: "Thou shalt not kill." A person comes into being not by their own will and should not transition to eternity by their own will either. This is God's will. When a person claims for themselves what belongs to God, they place themselves in God's stead. When a person takes another's life, they take away a life given by God, acting against His will. It is impossible to be more merciful than God – even in situations where we cannot comprehend why a terminally ill person suffers. From our human reasoning, it might seem more compassionate to end their suffering. Yet, we only see what is here and now, while God sees everything: earthly and heavenly, temporal and eternal. God loves a person more than their loved ones do – even more than the person loves themselves.
Euthanasia is a rebellion against God, against His providence and His mercy. It is an attempt to replace them with our human judgment and compassion. But if we reject God here on earth, how are we going to live without Him in eternity?
Read also
A hint at a new demographic reality?
It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.