Can fascism be Orthodox?
After the shelling of Okhmatdyt. Photo: Strana
Following the shelling of the Okhmatdyt children's hospital in Kyiv, an article appeared on the Russian website 'Tsargrad' not only justifying this crime but also calling for the continued extermination of the Ukrainian people, including children. Here are some quotes:
"The children's hospital in Kyiv is no accident. It’s time to acknowledge this and stop being afraid."
"Those who feel sorry for enemy children today do not feel sorry for their own."
"... there are no people on that side. Not a single person. Our missiles do not kill people. Not a single person. There are no people there."
"Maybe it’s time for us to agree that there is no civilian population on the other side of the Dnipro? And turn their cities into 'Gaza' – with the simple and clear goal of saving our children from death."
How should one respond to this?
First, we should understand that this is true fascism in its purest form, exactly like in Nazi Germany. And the consequences will be the same if it is allowed to burgeon.
Second, this fascism will inevitably grow in Russia if we label all Russians as fascists. If we repeatedly call those who reject this ideology fascists, they will eventually become what they are labeled.
Third, this has nothing to do with Orthodoxy or Christianity in general. The fact that it is published on a site positioning itself as "Orthodox" means nothing. It’s like the medieval fires of the Inquisition burning "Im majorem gloriam Dei" (for the greater glory of God). Is Christ to blame for the atrocities committed in His name? Is Orthodoxy to blame when calls to murder children are made under its banner?
The worst thing we can do when reading such calls for the extermination of Ukrainians is to become the same kind of fascists, only from the other side. To declare that there are no people in the Russian Federation and that killing Russian children is justified by saving Ukrainian ones.
"Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good." (Romans 12:21).
Read also
Why Epifaniy’s “piety” justifies Patriarch Bartholomew’s hopes
The Phanar is convinced that Dumenko “stands firmly and unshakably on spiritual heights.”
Dumenko’s “dialogue” appeal to the UOC: sincerity or strategy?
If the OCU truly wanted dialogue, it would decide to halt seizures and return what was taken.
Where did the circus go? It was here just yesterday
At an Orthodox Church of Ukraine “service” with Epifaniy (Dumenko) in the seized cathedral in Volodymyr, there are people. But the very next day – without Epifaniy – there are no people.
Why instigators of hatred against the UOC should be in prison
Churches were not built for one state to defeat another, not for the triumph of an “Ukrainian spirit,” and not for the “spirit” of any other nation.
Should His Beatitude commemorate the head of the ROC or not?
Fierce battles are being waged on social media and screens about how Metropolitan Onuphrius should act and how he should not.
Why are the authorities seizing churches and monasteries from the UOC?
Let’s ask a simple question – why does the state drive UOC monasteries and church communities out of their churches? Why does it need Orthodox shrines at all?