Let’s sue for insults
Activists at the Lavra are shouting insults. Photo: UOJ
Here’s a recent example: “Today, more than ever, it is imperative to pass a law banning the Russian pseudo-church FSB structure, which is disguised as the UOC-MP.” This was said by former president P. Poroshenko about the UOC. Almost every word here is a lie, an insult, and incitement of religious hatred. Why not file lawsuits every time such insults are uttered? Let them provide specific evidence for their words in court, instead of just brushing it off with "everyone knows this". And if they can’t provide evidence, let them publicly deny it and pay fines.
There are already such precedents in Ukraine. On 16 July 2024, the Kyiv Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Pechersk Court of Kyiv and ordered Shabunin's Anti-Corruption Center and the resources Ukrainska Pravda and Focus to refute information about the “pro-Russian” activities of lawyer Andriy Portnov, and to pay him 40 thousand hryvnias from each of the defendants. In the summer of 2023, these resources published a blog “Collaborators, Traitors, Russia’s Accomplices”, accusing Portnov of all these cases. But it’s one thing to label someone on websites and social networks, and quite another to prove your words in court. Incidentally, A. Portnov has already won similar lawsuits against the publications “Business. Censor”, “Public Television” and the channel “Direct”.
This means that there is a prospect for potential lawsuits to protect the reputation of the UOC. If every term like “Moscow priests”, “FSB church” and similar phrases results in a lawsuit, the UOC’s adversaries will think twice before saying them. Let’s teach them to be responsible for their words and respect human rights.
Read also
Advocatus diaboli: when falsehood becomes a virtue
Listening to the rhetoric of Shevchuk and his UCCRO colleagues, one cannot help but think of the famous film starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves – the one in which Reeves’s character discovers that he has been working as an attorney for the devil.
Authorities “open” the Far Caves – whatever they do, nothing works for them
The authorities and the OCU are straining every nerve to make everything look properly “churchlike” – every bit as respectable as under the “Moscow priests.” Yet all they ever produce is a parody with a distinctly Bolshevik stench.
Athonite monks at Dumenko’s Lavra “service”
OCU benefactors paid for the visit of a magnificent Byzantine choir led by the Archon Protopsaltis of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
When building a church is banned – is that “freedom of faith”?
In Nychehivka, the authorities unlawfully halted construction of a UOC church on private land.
Mobilizing UOC clergy: Are the authorities simply purging “Moscow priests”?
UOC clerics – unlike those of the OCU, UGCC, Jews, Muslims, and pagans – are granted no exemptions.
Will those who praised the Nazis be included in Ukraine's Pantheon of Heroes?
It may prove difficult to argue that people who sent greetings to Hitler and praised the Nazi army do not fall under Ukraine’s laws condemning Nazism.