Is Patriarch Bartholomew capabable of controlling the OCU?
Patriarch Bartholomew hands over the Tomos to Epifaniy Dumenko. Photo: OCU
On October 22, the head of the Ecumenical Patriarchate marked the 33rd anniversary of his patriarchate. Epifaniy Dumenko sent him an elaborate congratulatory message “on behalf of himself and the entirety” of the OCU, where he referred to Bartholomew as an “outstanding” figure and expressed thanks to him “from the entire Ukrainian people.”
But this is all formal; the behind-the-scenes reality is somewhat different.
Belarusian journalist Natallia Vasilevich claimed that in June 2023, she was personally a witness to a scolding that Bartholomew gave to Zoria over the OCU’s seizures of UOC churches and violence against its faithful.
It’s unlikely that the head of the Ecumenical Patriarchate was truly concerned for the Orthodox Ukrainians. Instead, the issue seems to be something else.
Vasilevich emphasized that the OCU’s actions have significantly tarnished Patriarch Bartholomew’s reputation. If Dumenko and his church actually respected Bartholomew as they claimed in their congratulatory messages, they would have completely ceased their banditry following that conversation.
But therein lies the issue: the seizures only became more commonplace and violent.
In other words, Dumenko disregarded the words and reputation of his benefactor, just as he once did with Filaret.
On the other hand, the Ecumenical Patriarchate’s decision to legitimize the UOC-KP and UAOC on October 10, 2018, included a final point which stated:
“We call on all parties involved to refrain from seizing churches, monasteries, and other properties, as well as from any other acts of violence or retribution.”
Thus, Bartholomew assumed that such a scenario was possible. He likely included this “just in case”, believing he would be able to control his new “nestlings”.
But as we can see, this was clearly a miscalculation by the old patriarch.
His “nestlings” have tasted blood, spread their wings, and grown into powerful vultures.
And it seems that Patriarch Bartholomew may never be able to control them again.
Read also
Who is working for the Kremlin in Poland? OCU, Uniates and Catholics versions
Who in the conflict between Poland and Ukraine is "an agent of the Russian Federation"? Zelensky, who gave the UPA name to an AFU special operations center? Nawrocki, who stripped him of an order for it? Polish MEPs?
Can we judge those who joined the OCU from the military commissariat?
There are many known cases where priests and deacons of the UOC, detained by TRC officers, were offered a simple way to secure their release – to switch to the OCU. Most refused.
On Rivne Metropolitan's excuse for service in Jerusalem
If today we consider it possible to make excuses for concelebrating with the ROC, what will we have to justify tomorrow?
UOC isn’t banned, just ‘de-Russified’? Neither was UGCC under Stalin then
By Shevchuk’s logic, Stalin never banned the UGCC or curtailed freedom of conscience – he merely “freed” the souls of the Uniates from Bandera ideology.
A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”
Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”
On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra
After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.