Is Patriarch Bartholomew capabable of controlling the OCU?
Patriarch Bartholomew hands over the Tomos to Epifaniy Dumenko. Photo: OCU
On October 22, the head of the Ecumenical Patriarchate marked the 33rd anniversary of his patriarchate. Epifaniy Dumenko sent him an elaborate congratulatory message “on behalf of himself and the entirety” of the OCU, where he referred to Bartholomew as an “outstanding” figure and expressed thanks to him “from the entire Ukrainian people.”
But this is all formal; the behind-the-scenes reality is somewhat different.
Belarusian journalist Natallia Vasilevich claimed that in June 2023, she was personally a witness to a scolding that Bartholomew gave to Zoria over the OCU’s seizures of UOC churches and violence against its faithful.
It’s unlikely that the head of the Ecumenical Patriarchate was truly concerned for the Orthodox Ukrainians. Instead, the issue seems to be something else.
Vasilevich emphasized that the OCU’s actions have significantly tarnished Patriarch Bartholomew’s reputation. If Dumenko and his church actually respected Bartholomew as they claimed in their congratulatory messages, they would have completely ceased their banditry following that conversation.
But therein lies the issue: the seizures only became more commonplace and violent.
In other words, Dumenko disregarded the words and reputation of his benefactor, just as he once did with Filaret.
On the other hand, the Ecumenical Patriarchate’s decision to legitimize the UOC-KP and UAOC on October 10, 2018, included a final point which stated:
“We call on all parties involved to refrain from seizing churches, monasteries, and other properties, as well as from any other acts of violence or retribution.”
Thus, Bartholomew assumed that such a scenario was possible. He likely included this “just in case”, believing he would be able to control his new “nestlings”.
But as we can see, this was clearly a miscalculation by the old patriarch.
His “nestlings” have tasted blood, spread their wings, and grown into powerful vultures.
And it seems that Patriarch Bartholomew may never be able to control them again.
Read also
Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists
In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.
Was the true number of voluntary transfers accidentally revealed in the OCU?
38 clerics out of 2000 "transfers" are about 2%. This is the exact percentage of actual voluntary transitions from the UOC to the OCU demonstrated to us by Serhiy Dumenko.
Opinion polls on the war and Zelensky: a case study in manufactured consent
KIIS polls on church-related issues have long served Dumenko and his circle as convenient “evidence” that the majority of Ukrainians supposedly belong to the OCU.
Seven years of the OCU – what fruits has it borne?
On the anniversary of the event, Dumenko produced a pompous text that appears to have been written in some parallel reality.
Metropolitan Arseniy and the Kremenchuk deputy: what is common?
The example in Kremenchuk is yet another evidence of the authorities' double standards. And we have the right to say that Bishop Arseniy is in the pre-trial detention center not because he committed a crime.
On sausage and milk during the fast
The true meaning of fasting is not gastronomical but spiritual. Yet how many of us can honestly say that during the fast we pray more, refrain from judging anyone, visit hospitals and prisons, and tend to those in distress?