Church and state: Does Ukraine really differ from the USSR?
Film screening in Chernihiv Cathedral. Photo: Suspilne
A screen was set up by the Royal Doors, and chairs were brought in for the audience, creating a makeshift movie theater.
Documentary projects are valuable, of course, but it raises the question – are there not enough cinemas, theaters, assembly halls, and other venues in Chernihiv where this screening could have taken place? Undoubtedly, there are.
It seems the authorities felt compelled to hold some kind of event in the 11th-century cathedral to demonstrate that it wasn’t taken from the faithful in vain.
But if we look back to what happened to the church 100 years ago, we see a similar situation.
In 1926, Soviet authorities banned worship in the cathedral and handed it over to "Glavrosmaslozhirsbyt" (the name of the food base – Ed.) to be used as a warehouse. Later, it was turned into a museum.
Some might argue that a movie theater in a church is better than a warehouse. But the ancient architects built this sacred space for prayer, not for warehouses, museums, dance floors, lecture halls, and so on.
Ukraine strongly condemns the crimes of the totalitarian Soviet regime, including in the religious sphere.
But it would be worthwhile if some official could refer to the example of the Transfiguration Cathedral to explain – what exactly is the difference today?
Read also
Can we judge those who joined the OCU from the military commissariat?
There are many known cases where priests and deacons of the UOC, detained by TRC officers, were offered a simple way to secure their release – to switch to the OCU. Most refused.
On Rivne Metropolitan's excuse for service in Jerusalem
If today we consider it possible to make excuses for concelebrating with the ROC, what will we have to justify tomorrow?
UOC isn’t banned, just ‘de-Russified’? Neither was UGCC under Stalin then
By Shevchuk’s logic, Stalin never banned the UGCC or curtailed freedom of conscience – he merely “freed” the souls of the Uniates from Bandera ideology.
A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”
Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”
On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra
After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.
You’re happy, aren’t you? Then why change anything?
The KIIS poll seems to be telling the U.S. authorities: Look, Ukrainians like living this way. They’re not just satisfied with everything – they’re happy. They don’t need peace, so why change anything?