Church and state: Does Ukraine really differ from the USSR?
Film screening in Chernihiv Cathedral. Photo: Suspilne
A screen was set up by the Royal Doors, and chairs were brought in for the audience, creating a makeshift movie theater.
Documentary projects are valuable, of course, but it raises the question – are there not enough cinemas, theaters, assembly halls, and other venues in Chernihiv where this screening could have taken place? Undoubtedly, there are.
It seems the authorities felt compelled to hold some kind of event in the 11th-century cathedral to demonstrate that it wasn’t taken from the faithful in vain.
But if we look back to what happened to the church 100 years ago, we see a similar situation.
In 1926, Soviet authorities banned worship in the cathedral and handed it over to "Glavrosmaslozhirsbyt" (the name of the food base – Ed.) to be used as a warehouse. Later, it was turned into a museum.
Some might argue that a movie theater in a church is better than a warehouse. But the ancient architects built this sacred space for prayer, not for warehouses, museums, dance floors, lecture halls, and so on.
Ukraine strongly condemns the crimes of the totalitarian Soviet regime, including in the religious sphere.
But it would be worthwhile if some official could refer to the example of the Transfiguration Cathedral to explain – what exactly is the difference today?
Read also
How the UOC Council in Feofania was turned into a “lawless gathering”
All the insults hurled at the Council – claims that it was a “mob gathering,” “filth,” “foam,” and the like – rest not on canons or facts, but solely on the emotions of those making them.
What kind of Ukraine are we moving toward?
Ukrainian authorities are now openly admitting that the country is facing a demographic catastrophe and that there are already not enough people left to fill the workforce.
Holy Rus' is becoming Muslim?
Hundreds of thousands of Muslims flooded the streets of Russia to celebrate Eid al-Adha. And what about Ukraine?
A voice from the grave
A hierarch who calls himself the “head of Orthodoxy” was secretly speaking with a man whom he himself had recognized as anathematized – and was negotiating with him about joining his own Church of Constantinople.
Lavra as a backdrop for a name-day celebration
Any service held by Epifaniy in the Lavra is simply an off-site event organized on the principle of “everything I need, I bring with me,” where the Lavra itself is used as a backdrop, a rented venue.
What is the difference between Dumenko and "Patriarch" Nikodym?
The difference between Dumenko and Kobzar is not in having or not having apostolic succession or spiritual gifts, nor in the depth of their theological knowledge.