Church and state: Does Ukraine really differ from the USSR?

Film screening in Chernihiv Cathedral. Photo: Suspilne

A screen was set up by the Royal Doors, and chairs were brought in for the audience, creating a makeshift movie theater.

Documentary projects are valuable, of course, but it raises the question – are there not enough cinemas, theaters, assembly halls, and other venues in Chernihiv where this screening could have taken place? Undoubtedly, there are.

It seems the authorities felt compelled to hold some kind of event in the 11th-century cathedral to demonstrate that it wasn’t taken from the faithful in vain.

But if we look back to what happened to the church 100 years ago, we see a similar situation.

In 1926, Soviet authorities banned worship in the cathedral and handed it over to "Glavrosmaslozhirsbyt" (the name of the food base – Ed.) to be used as a warehouse. Later, it was turned into a museum.

Some might argue that a movie theater in a church is better than a warehouse. But the ancient architects built this sacred space for prayer, not for warehouses, museums, dance floors, lecture halls, and so on.

Ukraine strongly condemns the crimes of the totalitarian Soviet regime, including in the religious sphere.

But it would be worthwhile if some official could refer to the example of the Transfiguration Cathedral to explain – what exactly is the difference today?

Read also

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.

Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra

In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.

"I don't celebrate Easter, I'm out of politics"

Unchurched people today are completely disoriented.