Church and state: Does Ukraine really differ from the USSR?
Film screening in Chernihiv Cathedral. Photo: Suspilne
A screen was set up by the Royal Doors, and chairs were brought in for the audience, creating a makeshift movie theater.
Documentary projects are valuable, of course, but it raises the question – are there not enough cinemas, theaters, assembly halls, and other venues in Chernihiv where this screening could have taken place? Undoubtedly, there are.
It seems the authorities felt compelled to hold some kind of event in the 11th-century cathedral to demonstrate that it wasn’t taken from the faithful in vain.
But if we look back to what happened to the church 100 years ago, we see a similar situation.
In 1926, Soviet authorities banned worship in the cathedral and handed it over to "Glavrosmaslozhirsbyt" (the name of the food base – Ed.) to be used as a warehouse. Later, it was turned into a museum.
Some might argue that a movie theater in a church is better than a warehouse. But the ancient architects built this sacred space for prayer, not for warehouses, museums, dance floors, lecture halls, and so on.
Ukraine strongly condemns the crimes of the totalitarian Soviet regime, including in the religious sphere.
But it would be worthwhile if some official could refer to the example of the Transfiguration Cathedral to explain – what exactly is the difference today?
Read also
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?
The Lavra: Who is the master of the house?
Neither the authorities nor the OCU actually need Orthodox churches. What they need is to show who is in charge of them.
On Patriarch Bartholomew's secret meetings with an anathematized person
Patriarch Bartholomew held negotiations with a man whose anathema he himself had officially recognized.