On the new-old bans of church media
Website blocking. Photo: KV.by
The State Special Communications Service for Information Protection has once again announced the blocking of Orthodox websites: UOJ and Dialog.tut. And once again – at the request of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU). And once again – without any explanation (unless citing martial law counts as an explanation).
Ukrainian authorities constantly proclaim their commitment to the European course and respect for human rights, yet they do the exact opposite. Judge for yourselves: is silencing Christian patriotic resources Europe? No, this is simply the typical Soviet approach – the very one that is now considered a model of a criminal totalitarian regime in Ukraine.
Yes, the SBU initiated an absurd and unfounded case against the UOJ staff, based on the ridiculous fantasies of two experts from the National Institute of Strategic Research. But the investigation has not provided a single fact of "criminal" activity from our resource. In turn, the State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) and the National Police have opened cases against the experts for falsification.
Let us remind you that earlier, by the order of the SBU, the website Raskolam.net and the official (!) website of the UOC were blocked. One might assume that, in the opinion of the SBU, those sites were also operated by criminals?
Let’s be clear – the government is simply persecuting any resource that supports the UOC and speaks the truth about the church situation in Ukraine.
Now, in the United States, forces have come to power that declare their commitment to traditional, and therefore religious, values. And the new vice president has directly criticized our authorities for persecuting the UOC.
Perhaps the new leadership of our key partners should explain to their Ukrainian colleagues the basic principles of democracy?
Read also
Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists
In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.
Was the true number of voluntary transfers accidentally revealed in the OCU?
38 clerics out of 2000 "transfers" are about 2%. This is the exact percentage of actual voluntary transitions from the UOC to the OCU demonstrated to us by Serhiy Dumenko.
Opinion polls on the war and Zelensky: a case study in manufactured consent
KIIS polls on church-related issues have long served Dumenko and his circle as convenient “evidence” that the majority of Ukrainians supposedly belong to the OCU.
Seven years of the OCU – what fruits has it borne?
On the anniversary of the event, Dumenko produced a pompous text that appears to have been written in some parallel reality.
Metropolitan Arseniy and the Kremenchuk deputy: what is common?
The example in Kremenchuk is yet another evidence of the authorities' double standards. And we have the right to say that Bishop Arseniy is in the pre-trial detention center not because he committed a crime.
On sausage and milk during the fast
The true meaning of fasting is not gastronomical but spiritual. Yet how many of us can honestly say that during the fast we pray more, refrain from judging anyone, visit hospitals and prisons, and tend to those in distress?