President, Church and the 'Ministry of Disunification"
Volodymyr Zelensky. Photo: Bigmir
The plan contains many expressive theses, but we would like to focus on two:
• The intention to create the "Ministry of Ukrainians’ Unification";
• The statement that the UOC (Ukrainian Orthodox Church) is a "Moscow Church" and that its time has ended.
At first glance, these theses may seem unrelated, but they are not.
We don't know whether the creation of yet another ministry will help unite Ukrainians, but there is no doubt that our country desperately needs such unity. Therefore, the President's efforts in this direction can only be welcomed.
But how can one simultaneously proclaim a large part of these "unified" Ukrainians as (once again) accomplices of terrorists and enemies of the people?
After all, representatives of the authorities have repeatedly stated that the UOC counts 5-6 million believers. As of today, that is a quarter of Ukraine's population.
How can one, with the left hand, "unite" Ukrainians, and with the right hand, divide them into categories? What kind of "unity" can this be? Basic logic suggests that this is nothing more than disunion, which is murderous in a time of war. In other words, by declaring one thing, the government is effectively producing the exact opposite.
How can one not recall George Orwell's famous novel “1984’, where there are:
• The Ministry of Truth, responsible for disinformation;
• The Ministry of Peace, responsible for conducting military operations;
• The Ministry of Love, responsible for identifying and eliminating people disloyal to the regime, and so on.
The thing is, Orwell wrote a cautionary novel, aimed against any forms of totalitarianism, whereas Ukraine is a democratic rule-of-law state. And we can’t have anything in common with Orwell's world.
Or can we?
Read also
A hint at a new demographic reality?
It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.