When you keep forgetting that you're not a politician
Epifaniy Dumenko. Photo: korrespondent.net
Seemingly neutral and innocuous words, but in a situation when in Tbilisi there is a violent confrontation between the authorities and activists positioning themselves as “pro-Europeans”, Dumenko's words look like an obvious appeal to support one of the sides, to support the “Georgian Maidan”.
Interestingly, these words are in sharp contrast to the statement of the Georgian Church, which not only did not support any of the parties to the conflict, but called for peace and mutual understanding in the name of Christian love. And here it is hard not to notice that the appeal of the Georgian Patriarchate is a unifying position of the Church, while the words of Dumenko are not those of a bishop but of a politician, as they are aimed only at strengthening divisions.
Moreover, the words of a foreign politician.
Read also
Who destroyed and restored Kyiv Lavra? MinCulture's video reveals the truth
The Culture Ministry’s propaganda about the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra has inadvertently revealed the truth.
Ternopil post on Feast of Intercession: Has calendar reformn failed?
A significant number of believers have rejected the new church calendar introduced by the OCU and UGCC with government support.
Shoulder straps or a cassock: who writes the script for UOC "fighters"?
Everything indicates that both Veliar and Pshenychny are ordinary performers of someone else's script. There is only one question – does the scriptwriter wear shoulder straps or a cassock?
Why is it legal to kill a person before birth but not after?
Children are the most privileged members of society. Yet that same society officially permits children to be killed – and on a massive scale.
Honoring the Bolsheviks’ successors at Kyiv Lavra
It was under the Reserve that the relics of the saints were desecrated, Lavra churches were turned into an atheism museum, and toilets were installed in sanctuaries.
"Degenerates" and "stupid animals": anti-UOC activists turn on children
Future historians will wonder how a vast country’s information agenda could have been shaped for so long by people so petty, vicious, and utterly contemptible.