Prickly on the inside, fluffy on the outside
Head of the OCU Epifaniy Dumenko. Photo: ukrinform.ua
Moreover, he stated that his "heart is open to the UOC." A true shepherd and European, indeed. Those in the audience were almost moved to tears.
And so might we – if not for one issue. Inside Ukraine, the OCU leader says the exact opposite. Let’s recall a couple of examples.
1. Before the first vote to ban the UOC, he claimed that such a ban was absolutely necessary because the UOC consists of "enemies who merely disguise themselves as Ukrainians while supporting the occupiers."
2. In May 2023, he referred to the UOC as "parasites", whose presence in Ukraine depends on the authorities: "The Kyiv-Pechersk and Pochaiv Lavras are still being used by those who, in reality, do not love this people. And they align with the Kremlin in denying our right to state and church independence."
And such statements from the head of the OCU are numerous.
Regarding his supposed desire for "dialogue with the UOC," which Dumenko assures Europeans of, let us remind you of these words of his: "There is no point in talking about a possible unification with those who openly oppose it because they have completely different values and priorities. <...> Ultimately, it makes no sense. We don’t need collaborators who hate everything Ukrainian in our ranks."
What conclusions can we draw? Very simple ones. For the domestic audience, Serhiy Dumenko has one set of messages, but for the international audience, they are entirely different. In Ukraine, he is a staunch radical patriot, but as soon as he crosses the border, he transforms into a gentle democrat.
Nothing personal – pure politics from the OCU.
Read also
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?