Prickly on the inside, fluffy on the outside
Head of the OCU Epifaniy Dumenko. Photo: ukrinform.ua
Moreover, he stated that his "heart is open to the UOC." A true shepherd and European, indeed. Those in the audience were almost moved to tears.
And so might we – if not for one issue. Inside Ukraine, the OCU leader says the exact opposite. Let’s recall a couple of examples.
1. Before the first vote to ban the UOC, he claimed that such a ban was absolutely necessary because the UOC consists of "enemies who merely disguise themselves as Ukrainians while supporting the occupiers."
2. In May 2023, he referred to the UOC as "parasites", whose presence in Ukraine depends on the authorities: "The Kyiv-Pechersk and Pochaiv Lavras are still being used by those who, in reality, do not love this people. And they align with the Kremlin in denying our right to state and church independence."
And such statements from the head of the OCU are numerous.
Regarding his supposed desire for "dialogue with the UOC," which Dumenko assures Europeans of, let us remind you of these words of his: "There is no point in talking about a possible unification with those who openly oppose it because they have completely different values and priorities. <...> Ultimately, it makes no sense. We don’t need collaborators who hate everything Ukrainian in our ranks."
What conclusions can we draw? Very simple ones. For the domestic audience, Serhiy Dumenko has one set of messages, but for the international audience, they are entirely different. In Ukraine, he is a staunch radical patriot, but as soon as he crosses the border, he transforms into a gentle democrat.
Nothing personal – pure politics from the OCU.
Read also
A hint at a new demographic reality?
It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.