National Day of Prayer: Sincerity or Hypocrisy?

Prayer. Photo: UOC

The authors of the initiative believe that:

On this day, the Rada plans to sing "Bozhe Velykyi Yedynyi" ("O Great and Only God"), and special events will be organized nationwide, developed by the Ukrainian Council of Churches and Religious Organizations (UCCRO).

Prayer is undoubtedly an important spiritual act. However, there are several questions that cannot be overlooked.

1. Who calls for prayer?

Of the 37 initiators of the bill, the majority are deputies who actively supported banning the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. How could they fail to see the contradiction in their "noble" intention? If you fight against the Church of Christ, deprive it of temples, clergy, and the ability to freely profess its faith, how can you then organize a national prayer?

2. What kind of spiritual unity is this?

"Spiritual unity of the people" is impossible when millions of Ukrainians are declared "second-class citizens," deprived of their churches, and branded as enemies within their own country.

3. What does prayer mean?

Prayer is not a "symbol of faith in victory," as the initiators claim. Christian prayer is a conversation with God, an act of humility and repentance, a striving to know His will. It should not be a tool for achieving political goals. A Christian can believe only in Christ, not in victory, an ideology, or the state.

The proposal to establish a National Day of Prayer appears to be a politically motivated decision entirely devoid of spiritual foundation. Those who prohibit others from praying, humiliate and insult them, have no moral right to speak of "spiritual unity" or to call the people to common prayer.

This is hypocrisy and extreme cynicism, as prayer to God cannot tolerate deceit or pretense. Prayer is not a declaration or a symbol but a living appeal to the Creator, who knows each heart. If the initiative to establish a Day of Prayer is not driven by a desire for genuine unity but by a wish to demonstrate self-righteousness while concealing a fundamentally godless essence, such prayer comes across as blasphemous mockery. One cannot speak of peace and unity while simultaneously destroying what belongs to God.

Read also

Why can a thief who stole from AFU walk out of SIZO, while Vladyka Arseniy cannot?

A man who stole food from soldiers in wartime is allowed the privilege of freedom, while a hierarch who fed hundreds of destitute refugees in the Lavra is denied even the possibility.

“There are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USSR”

One of the most disgraceful phenomena in the life of Ukraine’s present-day religious community is its complicity in justifying the crackdown on the UOC.

Why people heroize those who beat TRC

Why does the head of the UGCC publicly call for war until victory, while quietly hiding draft-dodging workers in temples? Why do OCU bloggers delete posts supporting the TRC due to massive hate?

On the long-awaited statements by Oleksandr Usyk

Oleksandr Usyk has declared that he is ready to become president. The only question is – whom does he now see as his voters?

Two weeks of OCU’s “brotherhood” talk to UOC: Any fruits yet?

So this is what the OCU’s “dialogue” looks like. One hand signs “appeals” about brotherhood – the other blesses people with angle grinders.

Potemkin villages of Serhii Dumenko

In Volodymyr, in Cherkasy, and in other UOC cathedrals that were seized – wherever Dumenko comes – his motorcades are shadowed by buses of hired “supporters”. Dumenko leaves – and so do “Potemkin peasants” together with their "vladyka."