National Day of Prayer: Sincerity or Hypocrisy?

Prayer. Photo: UOC

The authors of the initiative believe that:

On this day, the Rada plans to sing "Bozhe Velykyi Yedynyi" ("O Great and Only God"), and special events will be organized nationwide, developed by the Ukrainian Council of Churches and Religious Organizations (UCCRO).

Prayer is undoubtedly an important spiritual act. However, there are several questions that cannot be overlooked.

1. Who calls for prayer?

Of the 37 initiators of the bill, the majority are deputies who actively supported banning the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. How could they fail to see the contradiction in their "noble" intention? If you fight against the Church of Christ, deprive it of temples, clergy, and the ability to freely profess its faith, how can you then organize a national prayer?

2. What kind of spiritual unity is this?

"Spiritual unity of the people" is impossible when millions of Ukrainians are declared "second-class citizens," deprived of their churches, and branded as enemies within their own country.

3. What does prayer mean?

Prayer is not a "symbol of faith in victory," as the initiators claim. Christian prayer is a conversation with God, an act of humility and repentance, a striving to know His will. It should not be a tool for achieving political goals. A Christian can believe only in Christ, not in victory, an ideology, or the state.

The proposal to establish a National Day of Prayer appears to be a politically motivated decision entirely devoid of spiritual foundation. Those who prohibit others from praying, humiliate and insult them, have no moral right to speak of "spiritual unity" or to call the people to common prayer.

This is hypocrisy and extreme cynicism, as prayer to God cannot tolerate deceit or pretense. Prayer is not a declaration or a symbol but a living appeal to the Creator, who knows each heart. If the initiative to establish a Day of Prayer is not driven by a desire for genuine unity but by a wish to demonstrate self-righteousness while concealing a fundamentally godless essence, such prayer comes across as blasphemous mockery. One cannot speak of peace and unity while simultaneously destroying what belongs to God.

Read also

UOC vs. OCU numbers: pollsters count, social media recount

Official polling suggests Dumenko’s structure has an overwhelming lead in the number of parishioners, while social media polls paint a very different picture. Which should we believe?

Who is working for the Kremlin in Poland? OCU, Uniates and Catholics versions

Who in the conflict between Poland and Ukraine is "an agent of the Russian Federation"? Zelensky, who gave the UPA name to an AFU special operations center? Nawrocki, who stripped him of an order for it? Polish MEPs?

Can we judge those who joined the OCU from the military commissariat?

There are many known cases where priests and deacons of the UOC, detained by TRC officers, were offered a simple way to secure their release – to switch to the OCU. Most refused.

On Rivne Metropolitan's excuse for service in Jerusalem

If today we consider it possible to make excuses for concelebrating with the ROC, what will we have to justify tomorrow?

UOC isn’t banned, just ‘de-Russified’? Neither was UGCC under Stalin then

By Shevchuk’s logic, Stalin never banned the UGCC or curtailed freedom of conscience – he merely “freed” the souls of the Uniates from Bandera ideology.

A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”

Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”