National Day of Prayer: Sincerity or Hypocrisy?

Prayer. Photo: UOC

The authors of the initiative believe that:

On this day, the Rada plans to sing "Bozhe Velykyi Yedynyi" ("O Great and Only God"), and special events will be organized nationwide, developed by the Ukrainian Council of Churches and Religious Organizations (UCCRO).

Prayer is undoubtedly an important spiritual act. However, there are several questions that cannot be overlooked.

1. Who calls for prayer?

Of the 37 initiators of the bill, the majority are deputies who actively supported banning the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. How could they fail to see the contradiction in their "noble" intention? If you fight against the Church of Christ, deprive it of temples, clergy, and the ability to freely profess its faith, how can you then organize a national prayer?

2. What kind of spiritual unity is this?

"Spiritual unity of the people" is impossible when millions of Ukrainians are declared "second-class citizens," deprived of their churches, and branded as enemies within their own country.

3. What does prayer mean?

Prayer is not a "symbol of faith in victory," as the initiators claim. Christian prayer is a conversation with God, an act of humility and repentance, a striving to know His will. It should not be a tool for achieving political goals. A Christian can believe only in Christ, not in victory, an ideology, or the state.

The proposal to establish a National Day of Prayer appears to be a politically motivated decision entirely devoid of spiritual foundation. Those who prohibit others from praying, humiliate and insult them, have no moral right to speak of "spiritual unity" or to call the people to common prayer.

This is hypocrisy and extreme cynicism, as prayer to God cannot tolerate deceit or pretense. Prayer is not a declaration or a symbol but a living appeal to the Creator, who knows each heart. If the initiative to establish a Day of Prayer is not driven by a desire for genuine unity but by a wish to demonstrate self-righteousness while concealing a fundamentally godless essence, such prayer comes across as blasphemous mockery. One cannot speak of peace and unity while simultaneously destroying what belongs to God.

Read also

Will Zelensky agree that his grandfather was “scum”?

Natalia Pipa is one of the authors of a bill seeking to ban the UOC.

116 agreements with the aggressor in year five of war: Who must “sever ties”?

In the fifth year of war with Russia, Ukraine’s authorities have suddenly announced the termination of a number of legal agreements with Russia and the CIS.

Filaret is dead – Zoria is going after Kyiv Patriarchate

After Filaret’s death, OCU spokesman Yevstratiy Zoria has resumed his media assault on his rivals from the Kyiv Patriarchate. Let’s look at his main claims.

Why do the people love Patriarch Ilia so deeply?

What people truly long for is not simply a leader, but a man who stands before God on their behalf – one through whom the light of the divine presence quietly, unmistakably shines. This is the one thing people await from a first hierarch above all else.

Why did no one come for Filaret?

When Filaret – who had been “reinstated in his rank” – died, not a single bishop from any Local Church came to his funeral.

Is this the end of the Kyiv Patriarchate?

The UOC-KP is not protesting the fact that its head will be buried by the OCU.