Ecumenical Patriarch: Against violence in Magdeburg but for it in Cherkasy?

Epifaniy Dumenko and Patriarch Bartholomew. Photo: RBC Ukraine

"The Ecumenical Patriarchate firmly condemns all forms of violence, regardless of their origin. It prays for the repose of the souls of innocent victims, the full recovery of the injured, and the comfort of their loved ones plunged into mourning, pain, and sorrow," the Patriarch said.

And he is undoubtedly right. So why are we mentioning this?

Because when in Ukraine, members of the OCU commit acts of violence during the seizure of UOC churches, Patriarch Bartholomew remains silent. Consider, for example, the events in Cherkasy. In November 2023, OCU militants in camouflage seized the Nativity of the Virgin Monastery. During the attack, Father Sergiy Pashchenko had his jaw broken in two places, and an elderly parishioner suffered a broken leg. In October 2024, there was an even more violent seizure of the cathedral, where Metropolitan Theodosiy sustained a concussion after being struck on the head with a baton, and worshippers were shot with non-lethal weapons inside the church.

It is important to note that Patriarch Bartholomew has no ability to influence Islamist actions in Germany. However, he could certainly influence the actions of OCU militant believers. Moreover, had he condemned "all forms of violence" by the OCU in 2023, the "Cherkasy brawl" of 2024 might not have occurred. Neither would there have been violence in hundreds of other cases across Ukraine.

We realize that Patriarch Bartholomew is reluctant to admit the banditry of his protégés, as doing so would significantly damage his credibility. Yet, he will have no choice but to address it someday. This ostrich-like tactic of burying one's head in the sand has long lost its effectiveness.

Read also

From sanctuary to storage: how seized UOC churches are being repurposed

In Korsun-Shevchenkivskyi, members of the OCU are reportedly using the Church of the Savior Not Made by Hands – seized from the UOC – as a storage site for clothing.

Why can a thief who stole from AFU walk out of SIZO, while Vladyka Arseniy cannot?

A man who stole food from soldiers in wartime is allowed the privilege of freedom, while a hierarch who fed hundreds of destitute refugees in the Lavra is denied even the possibility.

“There are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USSR”

One of the most disgraceful phenomena in the life of Ukraine’s present-day religious community is its complicity in justifying the crackdown on the UOC.

Why people heroize those who beat TRC

Why does the head of the UGCC publicly call for war until victory, while quietly hiding draft-dodging workers in temples? Why do OCU bloggers delete posts supporting the TRC due to massive hate?

On the long-awaited statements by Oleksandr Usyk

Oleksandr Usyk has declared that he is ready to become president. The only question is – whom does he now see as his voters?

Two weeks of OCU’s “brotherhood” talk to UOC: Any fruits yet?

So this is what the OCU’s “dialogue” looks like. One hand signs “appeals” about brotherhood – the other blesses people with angle grinders.