MFA – UN: You should only see Russia's crimes against religion. Not ours
UN. Photo: Glavcom
It reads the following: “The Foreign Ministry's commentary on the false accusations of the UN about Ukraine's alleged restriction of religious freedoms.”
The main theses with our comments are:
1. The Foreign Ministry “rejects the UN conclusions” regarding the law on banning the UOC.
2. The law does not ban anything, but only “does not allow subordination” of religious organisations of Ukraine to centres in the Russian Federation”.
Sounds beautiful, but here's the problem – there are dozens of statements by MPs who directly say that this is exactly the law to ban the UOC. It turns out that for the internal consumer we talk about the fight against “Moscow priests”, but for the external consumer we say that there is no such fight. The Foreign Ministry also forgot to say that if such “subordination” is discovered, the organisation will be banned. And the scheme is as follows:
- First, DESS conducts an “expert examination” of the documents of the aggressor country (the Statute of the Russian Orthodox Church), after which it concludes that the UOC is subordinate to the Russian Church. At the same time, the provisions of the UOC’s Statute about its non-subordination to Moscow are ignored.
- The next stage – eparchies and communities of the UOC will be forced to break this non-existent connection.
- If you do not break this non-existent ties, you will be banned by court.
3. The Foreign Ministry reminded the UN that the Russian Federation uses religion in war.
No one argues, but what does the UOC and the law on its ban have to do with it?
4. Ukraine must protect citizens “from the destructive influence of the aggressor state, including with the use of religious organisations, which in Russia are fused with the state”.
The same question: what does the UOC have to do with it? Where is the evidence that there was such influence through it? There is not and cannot be any.
5. Russia commits religious crimes.
The same question: what does the UOC have to do with it?
6. The Foreign Ministry expects that the UN will “record Russian crimes against Ukrainian believers, religious communities and leaders, and church property”.
The final phrase is obviously missing here – and the UN will not record “Ukrainian” crimes against Ukrainian believers.
Our Foreign Ministry is counting VERY much on this.
Read also
Should the law banning the UOC be repealed?
It turns out that MPs from Batkivshchyna were taking money for “the right” votes. Could the vote for the law banning the UOC also have been “bought”?
Our raider–officials should brace themselves?
Someday the Zelensky era will end. And when it does, there will be plenty of claims to answer for. The war against Orthodoxy will be among the chief indictments.
State and Churches: For Catholics – restitution; for Orthodox – confiscation
Shouldn’t DESS be campaigning for the Kyiv Caves Lavra to be returned to the Church after the Bolsheviks expelled the monks a hundred years ago and turned it into a “museum complex”?
Why the idea of a "national Church" is doomed
According to the most optimistic estimates, the population of Ukraine is now no more than 19 million. The figure is shocking, especially when you remember that at the beginning of independence, 52 million people lived in the country.
"The UOC doesn’t hold funerals for soldiers": a lie-manufacturing machine
At the end of December, a wave of outrage swept across the internet over claims that UOC priests refused to serve a funeral for a fallen soldier in the Bukovynian village of Banyliv-Pidhirnyi. So what actually happened there?
Budanov instead of Yermak: Will anything change for the UOC?
Will the new head of the Presidential Office use the post to wage war against the UOC?