Orthodox and Jews: Who’s at home and who’s a guest
Menorah on Maidan. Photo: Focus
Chilly’s post is being widely discussed on social media, and Israel has even called on Ukraine to act "decisively against those inciting hatred and breaking the law," including on social media.
A centralized anti-crisis PR campaign is being rolled out across various platforms, showcasing the arguments used in this discussion. For example, a segment on the TV channel "1+1" featured interviews with several public figures outraged by Chilly’s post.
MP Vasylenko-Smahliuk stated that the Constitution guarantees everyone freedom of religion and the right to perform religious rituals. Expert Ihor Koshil argued that Ukrainians dissatisfied with menorahs are anti-Semites because "they are not ready to accept people who are different." Ukraine's Chief Rabbi Moshe Reuven Azman, speaking bluntly in Russian, claimed that anyone opposing the menorah in central Kyiv is "working for Russian propaganda."
Why are we writing about this? After all, Jews, like any other religious group, have the right to express their religious feelings as they see fit. However, it’s interesting to draw a parallel with the situation surrounding the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC).
Imagine for a moment that the president announced the need for spiritual independence for Ukraine’s Jews (perhaps because Russia’s Chief Rabbi meets with Putin and doesn’t condemn the "special military operation"). Imagine certain individuals began re-registering Jewish communities under the authority of other religious groups, storming synagogues, and spraying gas, breaking arms, legs, and jaws of Jews defending their sanctuaries. And instead of defending them, the authorities adopted a law banning Jews in Ukraine. Can you imagine that?
Unlikely. Such a scenario in Ukraine is impossible. Why is that?
Why does MP Vasylenko-Smahliuk, a Jewish woman, invoke the Constitution in defense of the menorah on Maidan but forgets about the Constitution when voting to ban the UOC? Why do journalists on "1+1," when commenting on the persecution of Orthodox Christians, not say that society "is not ready to accept those who are different," and instead encourage the harassment? Why don’t they point out that the persecution of the UOC benefits Russian propaganda?
There is nothing wrong with the authorities protecting and supporting Jews and ensuring they feel at home in Ukraine. The problem is that Orthodox Ukrainians are being made to feel as though they are merely guests in their own country.
Read also
Advocatus diaboli: when falsehood becomes a virtue
Listening to the rhetoric of Shevchuk and his UCCRO colleagues, one cannot help but think of the famous film starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves – the one in which Reeves’s character discovers that he has been working as an attorney for the devil.
Authorities “open” the Far Caves – whatever they do, nothing works for them
The authorities and the OCU are straining every nerve to make everything look properly “churchlike” – every bit as respectable as under the “Moscow priests.” Yet all they ever produce is a parody with a distinctly Bolshevik stench.
Athonite monks at Dumenko’s Lavra “service”
OCU benefactors paid for the visit of a magnificent Byzantine choir led by the Archon Protopsaltis of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
When building a church is banned – is that “freedom of faith”?
In Nychehivka, the authorities unlawfully halted construction of a UOC church on private land.
Mobilizing UOC clergy: Are the authorities simply purging “Moscow priests”?
UOC clerics – unlike those of the OCU, UGCC, Jews, Muslims, and pagans – are granted no exemptions.
Will those who praised the Nazis be included in Ukraine's Pantheon of Heroes?
It may prove difficult to argue that people who sent greetings to Hitler and praised the Nazi army do not fall under Ukraine’s laws condemning Nazism.