Orthodox and Jews: Who’s at home and who’s a guest
Menorah on Maidan. Photo: Focus
Chilly’s post is being widely discussed on social media, and Israel has even called on Ukraine to act "decisively against those inciting hatred and breaking the law," including on social media.
A centralized anti-crisis PR campaign is being rolled out across various platforms, showcasing the arguments used in this discussion. For example, a segment on the TV channel "1+1" featured interviews with several public figures outraged by Chilly’s post.
MP Vasylenko-Smahliuk stated that the Constitution guarantees everyone freedom of religion and the right to perform religious rituals. Expert Ihor Koshil argued that Ukrainians dissatisfied with menorahs are anti-Semites because "they are not ready to accept people who are different." Ukraine's Chief Rabbi Moshe Reuven Azman, speaking bluntly in Russian, claimed that anyone opposing the menorah in central Kyiv is "working for Russian propaganda."
Why are we writing about this? After all, Jews, like any other religious group, have the right to express their religious feelings as they see fit. However, it’s interesting to draw a parallel with the situation surrounding the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC).
Imagine for a moment that the president announced the need for spiritual independence for Ukraine’s Jews (perhaps because Russia’s Chief Rabbi meets with Putin and doesn’t condemn the "special military operation"). Imagine certain individuals began re-registering Jewish communities under the authority of other religious groups, storming synagogues, and spraying gas, breaking arms, legs, and jaws of Jews defending their sanctuaries. And instead of defending them, the authorities adopted a law banning Jews in Ukraine. Can you imagine that?
Unlikely. Such a scenario in Ukraine is impossible. Why is that?
Why does MP Vasylenko-Smahliuk, a Jewish woman, invoke the Constitution in defense of the menorah on Maidan but forgets about the Constitution when voting to ban the UOC? Why do journalists on "1+1," when commenting on the persecution of Orthodox Christians, not say that society "is not ready to accept those who are different," and instead encourage the harassment? Why don’t they point out that the persecution of the UOC benefits Russian propaganda?
There is nothing wrong with the authorities protecting and supporting Jews and ensuring they feel at home in Ukraine. The problem is that Orthodox Ukrainians are being made to feel as though they are merely guests in their own country.
Read also
Orthodoxy and LGBT: Has the first domino fallen?
The Council of the Finnish Church has endorsed LGBT rights and supporters of gender ideology.
On Constantinople Patriarchate’s decision to honor head of organized crime group
The Ecumenical Patriarchate never ceases to astonish.
Opening a bust of Mazepa: A new era for Kyiv–Pechersk Lavra. Or not?
Do Zelensky, Yelensky, and the rest of the Kotliarevska cohort truly believe that, in the Lavra, prayer should be displaced by these absurd Soviet-style spectacles?
The UOC and the end of the Yermak era
The man who clearly played a major role in the processes unfolding between the authorities and the UOC has stepped down.
On the harassment of a Russian speaking child by “OCU atheist”
A scandal is now raging online over the latest outburst of a language activist who decided to “cut down to size” a 3-year-old displaced girl.
Why Finnish archbishop speaks out against Trump’s peace plan
“This requirement can only mean granting guarantees to the Moscow Patriarchate’s church structure in the country,” the head of the Finnish Church protested.