Orthodox and Jews: Who’s at home and who’s a guest

Menorah on Maidan. Photo: Focus

Chilly’s post is being widely discussed on social media, and Israel has even called on Ukraine to act "decisively against those inciting hatred and breaking the law," including on social media.

A centralized anti-crisis PR campaign is being rolled out across various platforms, showcasing the arguments used in this discussion. For example, a segment on the TV channel "1+1" featured interviews with several public figures outraged by Chilly’s post.

MP Vasylenko-Smahliuk stated that the Constitution guarantees everyone freedom of religion and the right to perform religious rituals. Expert Ihor Koshil argued that Ukrainians dissatisfied with menorahs are anti-Semites because "they are not ready to accept people who are different." Ukraine's Chief Rabbi Moshe Reuven Azman, speaking bluntly in Russian, claimed that anyone opposing the menorah in central Kyiv is "working for Russian propaganda."

Why are we writing about this? After all, Jews, like any other religious group, have the right to express their religious feelings as they see fit. However, it’s interesting to draw a parallel with the situation surrounding the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC).

Imagine for a moment that the president announced the need for spiritual independence for Ukraine’s Jews (perhaps because Russia’s Chief Rabbi meets with Putin and doesn’t condemn the "special military operation"). Imagine certain individuals began re-registering Jewish communities under the authority of other religious groups, storming synagogues, and spraying gas, breaking arms, legs, and jaws of Jews defending their sanctuaries. And instead of defending them, the authorities adopted a law banning Jews in Ukraine. Can you imagine that?

Unlikely. Such a scenario in Ukraine is impossible. Why is that?

Why does MP Vasylenko-Smahliuk, a Jewish woman, invoke the Constitution in defense of the menorah on Maidan but forgets about the Constitution when voting to ban the UOC? Why do journalists on "1+1," when commenting on the persecution of Orthodox Christians, not say that society "is not ready to accept those who are different," and instead encourage the harassment? Why don’t they point out that the persecution of the UOC benefits Russian propaganda?

There is nothing wrong with the authorities protecting and supporting Jews and ensuring they feel at home in Ukraine. The problem is that Orthodox Ukrainians are being made to feel as though they are merely guests in their own country.

Read also

Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about

Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.

Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?

The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.

Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?

Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”

Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?

The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?

The Lavra: Who is the master of the house?

Neither the authorities nor the OCU actually need Orthodox churches. What they need is to show who is in charge of them.

Procession to Pochaiv: first impressions