When you "ban" Christmas and go to celebrate it
Putin and Poroshenko. Photo: Kommersant
In other words, the same people who publicly voted to ban the UOC and cancel the public holiday on 7 January, the day of "Moscow" Christmas, went to celebrate it quietly. Or rather, they probably remembered that during church feasts "working is a sin".
And this all feels strangely familiar.
The same Bolsheviks who publicly opposed the Church and even shut down temples, secretly took their children to baptise and receive communions with priests hiding in distant villages.
The same thing was done by the "patriotic" officials and even the "priests" of Filaret during the UOC-KP era: publicly, they fiercely criticized the "Moscow Church" but privately, "just in case," they performed Sacraments in it to make sure everything was "as it should be".
Times change, but not the rulers.
Read also
The collapse of the “Moscow priest and boy in bed” story
The smear campaign against the UOC is being carried out on a large and well-coordinated scale by the SBU, the media, and the OCU.
Not to become a Judas
These days, it has become fashionable to “understand and forgive” Judas – to search for some noble motive behind his betrayal.
About the missile strike on Sumy
We sincerely hope that Patriarch Kirill will condemn the war in which "his flock" is suffering.
On the seizure in Verkhni Stanivtsi
Everyone who is being mocked today by the united pack of hryshchuks, officials, and policemen will not forget this quickly.
On a priest who voluntarily joined the OCU
According to official narratives, over 1,500 parishes have voluntarily joined the OCU. Yet for some reason, Dumenko is promoting a meeting with a priest from a tiny village in Zhytomyr Oblast.
How did Christ and the Apostle Paul describe OCU's adept Hryshchuk?
Roman Hryshchuk, a cleric of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU), concealed his face beneath a hood as he led a nighttime assault on the UOC church in the village of Verkhni Stanivtsi. Now, he has publicly explained why.