When you "ban" Christmas and go to celebrate it
Putin and Poroshenko. Photo: Kommersant
In other words, the same people who publicly voted to ban the UOC and cancel the public holiday on 7 January, the day of "Moscow" Christmas, went to celebrate it quietly. Or rather, they probably remembered that during church feasts "working is a sin".
And this all feels strangely familiar.
The same Bolsheviks who publicly opposed the Church and even shut down temples, secretly took their children to baptise and receive communions with priests hiding in distant villages.
The same thing was done by the "patriotic" officials and even the "priests" of Filaret during the UOC-KP era: publicly, they fiercely criticized the "Moscow Church" but privately, "just in case," they performed Sacraments in it to make sure everything was "as it should be".
Times change, but not the rulers.
Read also
On the discord surrounding the ban of female human rights activist
In angrily denouncing one another, we drift away from the very thing Christ taught us above all else – love.
On His Beatitude Onuphry
A clergyman must lead a person to God. Not by winding detours through service to the state, the nation, or ecology, but by the shortest and most direct road – the road of the Gospel.
Why UCCRO should rename itself as “State Service for Religious Affairs”
For several years now, the Ukrainian Council of Churches and Religious Organizations has been operating under a name that no longer reflects reality.
On the church raid in Odesa
The OCU’s church raids have long been remarkable for their sheer absurdity.
Zelensky's revoked order: What kind of heroes should Ukrainians have?
In recent years, the Ukrainian authorities have sought to present members of the OUN-UPA as heroes for all Ukrainians.