Government's double standards: Protecting some while oppressing others
Meeting of the Head of the State Ethnopolitics Service with representatives of the U.S. Jewish community. Photo: State Ethnopolitics Service
The State Ethnopolitics Service (DESS) has expressed concern over the protection of Jewish rights, including religious ones. The agency has called on Ukrainians to discuss a draft law on additional measures to counter antisemitism.
Let us recall a few obvious facts.
Jews are the only religious group in Ukraine that is allowed by the authorities to hold mass gatherings during wartime. Tens of thousands of people participate in the annual pilgrimages to Uman, despite the mayor’s claims that the city is unprepared to provide shelters in case of air raids.
During Jewish holidays, menorahs are installed in the main squares of Ukrainian cities. Political and military leaders take part in Jewish rituals.
Given all this, do Jews still need additional protection?
According to DESS, the new law will help Ukraine align itself more closely with the EU by implementing the recommendations of the European Commission.
This is all well and good – Jews should not suffer under any circumstances. But what about Orthodox Ukrainians? Are they not worth protecting? Their churches are being seized and physically demolished, their services disrupted by police, their access to holy sites blocked, and entire laws are passed against them.
This is reminiscent of a homeowner whose roof has long since collapsed, the floor has rotted, and the walls are about to fall apart, yet he diligently polishes the doorknob, which already shines.
It’s a peculiar and utterly weird reality.
Read also
State and Churches: For Catholics – restitution; for Orthodox – confiscation
Shouldn’t DESS be campaigning for the Kyiv Caves Lavra to be returned to the Church after the Bolsheviks expelled the monks a hundred years ago and turned it into a “museum complex”?
Why the idea of a "national Church" is doomed
According to the most optimistic estimates, the population of Ukraine is now no more than 19 million. The figure is shocking, especially when you remember that at the beginning of independence, 52 million people lived in the country.
"The UOC doesn’t hold funerals for soldiers": a lie-manufacturing machine
At the end of December, a wave of outrage swept across the internet over claims that UOC priests refused to serve a funeral for a fallen soldier in the Bukovynian village of Banyliv-Pidhirnyi. So what actually happened there?
Budanov instead of Yermak: Will anything change for the UOC?
Will the new head of the Presidential Office use the post to wage war against the UOC?
“Should Bandera's birthday occur…”
Congratulations are posted for Bandera’s birthday on the pages of three popular OCU “priest-bloggers.” However, there are no publications at all dedicated to Basil the Great or to the Feast of the Circumcision.
Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists
In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.