Government's double standards: Protecting some while oppressing others
Meeting of the Head of the State Ethnopolitics Service with representatives of the U.S. Jewish community. Photo: State Ethnopolitics Service
The State Ethnopolitics Service (DESS) has expressed concern over the protection of Jewish rights, including religious ones. The agency has called on Ukrainians to discuss a draft law on additional measures to counter antisemitism.
Let us recall a few obvious facts.
Jews are the only religious group in Ukraine that is allowed by the authorities to hold mass gatherings during wartime. Tens of thousands of people participate in the annual pilgrimages to Uman, despite the mayor’s claims that the city is unprepared to provide shelters in case of air raids.
During Jewish holidays, menorahs are installed in the main squares of Ukrainian cities. Political and military leaders take part in Jewish rituals.
Given all this, do Jews still need additional protection?
According to DESS, the new law will help Ukraine align itself more closely with the EU by implementing the recommendations of the European Commission.
This is all well and good – Jews should not suffer under any circumstances. But what about Orthodox Ukrainians? Are they not worth protecting? Their churches are being seized and physically demolished, their services disrupted by police, their access to holy sites blocked, and entire laws are passed against them.
This is reminiscent of a homeowner whose roof has long since collapsed, the floor has rotted, and the walls are about to fall apart, yet he diligently polishes the doorknob, which already shines.
It’s a peculiar and utterly weird reality.
Read also
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?
The Lavra: Who is the master of the house?
Neither the authorities nor the OCU actually need Orthodox churches. What they need is to show who is in charge of them.