Government's double standards: Protecting some while oppressing others
Meeting of the Head of the State Ethnopolitics Service with representatives of the U.S. Jewish community. Photo: State Ethnopolitics Service
The State Ethnopolitics Service (DESS) has expressed concern over the protection of Jewish rights, including religious ones. The agency has called on Ukrainians to discuss a draft law on additional measures to counter antisemitism.
Let us recall a few obvious facts.
Jews are the only religious group in Ukraine that is allowed by the authorities to hold mass gatherings during wartime. Tens of thousands of people participate in the annual pilgrimages to Uman, despite the mayor’s claims that the city is unprepared to provide shelters in case of air raids.
During Jewish holidays, menorahs are installed in the main squares of Ukrainian cities. Political and military leaders take part in Jewish rituals.
Given all this, do Jews still need additional protection?
According to DESS, the new law will help Ukraine align itself more closely with the EU by implementing the recommendations of the European Commission.
This is all well and good – Jews should not suffer under any circumstances. But what about Orthodox Ukrainians? Are they not worth protecting? Their churches are being seized and physically demolished, their services disrupted by police, their access to holy sites blocked, and entire laws are passed against them.
This is reminiscent of a homeowner whose roof has long since collapsed, the floor has rotted, and the walls are about to fall apart, yet he diligently polishes the doorknob, which already shines.
It’s a peculiar and utterly weird reality.
Read also
Advocatus diaboli: when falsehood becomes a virtue
Listening to the rhetoric of Shevchuk and his UCCRO colleagues, one cannot help but think of the famous film starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves – the one in which Reeves’s character discovers that he has been working as an attorney for the devil.
Authorities “open” the Far Caves – whatever they do, nothing works for them
The authorities and the OCU are straining every nerve to make everything look properly “churchlike” – every bit as respectable as under the “Moscow priests.” Yet all they ever produce is a parody with a distinctly Bolshevik stench.
Athonite monks at Dumenko’s Lavra “service”
OCU benefactors paid for the visit of a magnificent Byzantine choir led by the Archon Protopsaltis of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
When building a church is banned – is that “freedom of faith”?
In Nychehivka, the authorities unlawfully halted construction of a UOC church on private land.
Mobilizing UOC clergy: Are the authorities simply purging “Moscow priests”?
UOC clerics – unlike those of the OCU, UGCC, Jews, Muslims, and pagans – are granted no exemptions.
Will those who praised the Nazis be included in Ukraine's Pantheon of Heroes?
It may prove difficult to argue that people who sent greetings to Hitler and praised the Nazi army do not fall under Ukraine’s laws condemning Nazism.