Government's double standards: Protecting some while oppressing others

Meeting of the Head of the State Ethnopolitics Service with representatives of the U.S. Jewish community. Photo: State Ethnopolitics Service

The State Ethnopolitics Service (DESS) has expressed concern over the protection of Jewish rights, including religious ones. The agency has called on Ukrainians to discuss a draft law on additional measures to counter antisemitism.

Let us recall a few obvious facts.

Jews are the only religious group in Ukraine that is allowed by the authorities to hold mass gatherings during wartime. Tens of thousands of people participate in the annual pilgrimages to Uman, despite the mayor’s claims that the city is unprepared to provide shelters in case of air raids.

During Jewish holidays, menorahs are installed in the main squares of Ukrainian cities. Political and military leaders take part in Jewish rituals.

Given all this, do Jews still need additional protection?

According to DESS, the new law will help Ukraine align itself more closely with the EU by implementing the recommendations of the European Commission.

This is all well and good – Jews should not suffer under any circumstances. But what about Orthodox Ukrainians? Are they not worth protecting? Their churches are being seized and physically demolished, their services disrupted by police, their access to holy sites blocked, and entire laws are passed against them.

This is reminiscent of a homeowner whose roof has long since collapsed, the floor has rotted, and the walls are about to fall apart, yet he diligently polishes the doorknob, which already shines.

It’s a peculiar and utterly weird reality.

Read also

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.

Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra

In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.

"I don't celebrate Easter, I'm out of politics"

Unchurched people today are completely disoriented.