Will Kyiv Lavra be renamed too after renaming Lavrska Street?

Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. Photo: Katarin Tour

They argue that the Soviets sought to destroy the Church as an institution, while they do not. Instead, they claim to support the Church – but not the "Moscow" one, only the Ukrainian one.

Let’s set aside the dancing and shows in the Lavra, film screenings in the Chernihiv Cathedral, and so on. Instead, let’s focus on their latest initiative.

Twenty-five members of parliament have demanded that Vitali Klitschko rename Lavrska Street to Mazepa Street.

“Yanukovych has long fled to Russia, the activities of the ROC in Ukraine are banned. Yet the decision imposed by them on the city community is still in effect. This is abnormal and unacceptable,” stated Volodymyr Viatrovych.

To recap, in 2007, Kyiv City Council renamed January Uprising Street to Mazepa Street. However, in 2010, a section of the street (where the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra is located) was renamed Lavrska Street. Now, MPs want to reverse this decision.

Their argument is that Mazepa funded the construction of the All Saints Church in the Lavra, as well as the restoration of the Trinity Gate Church, the Dormition Cathedral, and more.

But where’s the logic? Suppose Mazepa was a great benefactor to the Lavra. Why destroy the street named after it, especially since the street practically consists only of the Lavra? What’s more important here – Mazepa or the Lavra? This is like proposing to rename Kyiv to Mazepa. Or better yet – the entire country of Ukraine. Why not? He did so much good for the nation!

On a serious note, this initiative clearly shows that our authorities are not fighting "Moscow priests" but rather the Church of Christ itself. They’ve already allowed the OCU into the Upper Lavra, monks are about to be evicted from the Lower Lavra, and access to the caves and relics of the saints has been closed off to the faithful. Isn’t that a "victory"?

But no, that’s not enough. The street must also be "canceled" so that even the memory of it is erased from the people.

Here’s a suggestion for Viatrovych’s next logical step: rename the Lavra to “Museum Town”. That’s exactly what the Bolsheviks did in their time. Why bother coming up with something new when you’re already following their blueprint to the letter?

Read also

Orthodoxy and LGBT: Has the first domino fallen?

The Council of the Finnish Church has endorsed LGBT rights and supporters of gender ideology.

On Constantinople Patriarchate’s decision to honor head of organized crime group

The Ecumenical Patriarchate never ceases to astonish.

Opening a bust of Mazepa: A new era for Kyiv–Pechersk Lavra. Or not?

Do Zelensky, Yelensky, and the rest of the Kotliarevska cohort truly believe that, in the Lavra, prayer should be displaced by these absurd Soviet-style spectacles?

The UOC and the end of the Yermak era

The man who clearly played a major role in the processes unfolding between the authorities and the UOC has stepped down.

On the harassment of a Russian speaking child by “OCU atheist”

A scandal is now raging online over the latest outburst of a language activist who decided to “cut down to size” a 3-year-old displaced girl.

Why Finnish archbishop speaks out against Trump’s peace plan

“This requirement can only mean granting guarantees to the Moscow Patriarchate’s church structure in the country,” the head of the Finnish Church protested.