Will Kyiv Lavra be renamed too after renaming Lavrska Street?

Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. Photo: Katarin Tour
They argue that the Soviets sought to destroy the Church as an institution, while they do not. Instead, they claim to support the Church – but not the "Moscow" one, only the Ukrainian one.
Let’s set aside the dancing and shows in the Lavra, film screenings in the Chernihiv Cathedral, and so on. Instead, let’s focus on their latest initiative.
Twenty-five members of parliament have demanded that Vitali Klitschko rename Lavrska Street to Mazepa Street.
“Yanukovych has long fled to Russia, the activities of the ROC in Ukraine are banned. Yet the decision imposed by them on the city community is still in effect. This is abnormal and unacceptable,” stated Volodymyr Viatrovych.
To recap, in 2007, Kyiv City Council renamed January Uprising Street to Mazepa Street. However, in 2010, a section of the street (where the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra is located) was renamed Lavrska Street. Now, MPs want to reverse this decision.
Their argument is that Mazepa funded the construction of the All Saints Church in the Lavra, as well as the restoration of the Trinity Gate Church, the Dormition Cathedral, and more.
But where’s the logic? Suppose Mazepa was a great benefactor to the Lavra. Why destroy the street named after it, especially since the street practically consists only of the Lavra? What’s more important here – Mazepa or the Lavra? This is like proposing to rename Kyiv to Mazepa. Or better yet – the entire country of Ukraine. Why not? He did so much good for the nation!
On a serious note, this initiative clearly shows that our authorities are not fighting "Moscow priests" but rather the Church of Christ itself. They’ve already allowed the OCU into the Upper Lavra, monks are about to be evicted from the Lower Lavra, and access to the caves and relics of the saints has been closed off to the faithful. Isn’t that a "victory"?
But no, that’s not enough. The street must also be "canceled" so that even the memory of it is erased from the people.
Here’s a suggestion for Viatrovych’s next logical step: rename the Lavra to “Museum Town”. That’s exactly what the Bolsheviks did in their time. Why bother coming up with something new when you’re already following their blueprint to the letter?
Read also

OCU: To steal and seize
The church community is trying to defend its temple from outsiders – armed with angle grinders, knives, bolt cutters, and crowbars – who are storming churches to which they have no connection whatsoever.
A bishop who lies, steals – and boasts about it
What do we call a person who tells lies and takes what doesn’t belong to them? Likely – a liar and a thief. But what if that person is wearing a bishop’s panagia?
Will monks be expelled from Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra on Ascension Day?
The Lavra's lawyer, Fr. Nikita Chekman reported that on May 29, on the Feast of the Lord's Ascension, the new management of the Lavra Reserve is preparing to block the monks from accessing their own shrine.
When the main authority for the Church persecutor is Russia
One of the main haters of the UOC in power, MP Mykyta Poturaev, gave an utterly cynical interview to Lviv media about plans to destroy the UOC.
A government scenario for communities that managed to expel raiders
It is unlikely that law enforcers will show any leniency during a new assault on the church.
Waiting for the authorities to start swearing at the UOC?
According to Minister of Culture of Ukraine Mykola Tochytskyi, the country no longer has the luxury of time – it's time to put an end to the “uncontrolled presence of Moscow monks” and the “continued destruction of cultural monuments.”