Will Kyiv Lavra be renamed too after renaming Lavrska Street?

Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra. Photo: Katarin Tour

They argue that the Soviets sought to destroy the Church as an institution, while they do not. Instead, they claim to support the Church – but not the "Moscow" one, only the Ukrainian one.

Let’s set aside the dancing and shows in the Lavra, film screenings in the Chernihiv Cathedral, and so on. Instead, let’s focus on their latest initiative.

Twenty-five members of parliament have demanded that Vitali Klitschko rename Lavrska Street to Mazepa Street.

“Yanukovych has long fled to Russia, the activities of the ROC in Ukraine are banned. Yet the decision imposed by them on the city community is still in effect. This is abnormal and unacceptable,” stated Volodymyr Viatrovych.

To recap, in 2007, Kyiv City Council renamed January Uprising Street to Mazepa Street. However, in 2010, a section of the street (where the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra is located) was renamed Lavrska Street. Now, MPs want to reverse this decision.

Their argument is that Mazepa funded the construction of the All Saints Church in the Lavra, as well as the restoration of the Trinity Gate Church, the Dormition Cathedral, and more.

But where’s the logic? Suppose Mazepa was a great benefactor to the Lavra. Why destroy the street named after it, especially since the street practically consists only of the Lavra? What’s more important here – Mazepa or the Lavra? This is like proposing to rename Kyiv to Mazepa. Or better yet – the entire country of Ukraine. Why not? He did so much good for the nation!

On a serious note, this initiative clearly shows that our authorities are not fighting "Moscow priests" but rather the Church of Christ itself. They’ve already allowed the OCU into the Upper Lavra, monks are about to be evicted from the Lower Lavra, and access to the caves and relics of the saints has been closed off to the faithful. Isn’t that a "victory"?

But no, that’s not enough. The street must also be "canceled" so that even the memory of it is erased from the people.

Here’s a suggestion for Viatrovych’s next logical step: rename the Lavra to “Museum Town”. That’s exactly what the Bolsheviks did in their time. Why bother coming up with something new when you’re already following their blueprint to the letter?

Read also

Advocatus diaboli: when falsehood becomes a virtue

Listening to the rhetoric of Shevchuk and his UCCRO colleagues, one cannot help but think of the famous film starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves – the one in which Reeves’s character discovers that he has been working as an attorney for the devil.

Authorities “open” the Far Caves – whatever they do, nothing works for them

The authorities and the OCU are straining every nerve to make everything look properly “churchlike” – every bit as respectable as under the “Moscow priests.” Yet all they ever produce is a parody with a distinctly Bolshevik stench.

Athonite monks at Dumenko’s Lavra “service”

OCU benefactors paid for the visit of a magnificent Byzantine choir led by the Archon Protopsaltis of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.

When building a church is banned – is that “freedom of faith”?

In Nychehivka, the authorities unlawfully halted construction of a UOC church on private land.

Mobilizing UOC clergy: Are the authorities simply purging “Moscow priests”?

UOC clerics – unlike those of the OCU, UGCC, Jews, Muslims, and pagans – are granted no exemptions.

Will those who praised the Nazis be included in Ukraine's Pantheon of Heroes?

It may prove difficult to argue that people who sent greetings to Hitler and praised the Nazi army do not fall under Ukraine’s laws condemning Nazism.