Are Greeks opening their Patriarch’s eyes to Ukraine?
Mount Athos. Photo: Turnavigator
1. The text is signed by abbots and monastics who are under the jurisdiction of the Phanar and Greece – Churches that have recognised the OCU. Formally, they should not even admit the existence of the UOC, since Patriarch Bartholomew does not recognise it. Nevertheless, they refer to it not as a collection of “eparchies of the Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine” (as the head of the Phanar does) but the Ukrainian Orthodox Church under Metropolitan Onuphry, who is followed by the vast majority of Ukrainian Orthodox Christians (about 24 million).”
2. The UOC is the true Church of Christ because it is undergoing persecution: “Persecution is a sign of the authenticity of Christian life.”
3. They refer to the OCU as the “so-called” Church and note the collaboration of its members with bandits who are seizing UOC churches.
4. The signatories condemn the Ukrainian authorities, who are trying to outlaw the UOC, calling them a state “in the times of Hitler and Stalin”.
5. The text provides details of the seizure of the cathedral in Cherkasy. This shows that Greece and Mount Athos are following the situation in Ukraine closely. And if they know about Cherkasy, they are aware of many other similar cases.
6. The Greeks quote Patriarch Bartholomew’s words about the inadmissibility of violence in churches, specifically in the context of the Church of St. Dionysius in Athens.
And here it is appropriate to recall one of the decisions of the 2018 Synod, by which the Phanar legitimised Filaret, Macarius and their followers: ‘To appeal to all parties involved to refrain from seizing churches, monasteries and other property, as well as from any other violent actions.’
In other words, Patriarch Bartholomew feared that seizures and violence would occur in Ukraine. And if a person fears something, at the very least, they keep an eye on the situation to take action if there are excesses.
All this time, while violence has been directed at the believers of the UOC, the head of the Phanar has remained silent. Let’s even assume that he truly did not know about it. But now, pretending not to see is impossible – his own clerics are opening Patriarch Bartholomew’s eyes.
Will he take steps to correct what he has wrought?
Read also
Lavra as a backdrop for a name-day celebration
Any service held by Epifaniy in the Lavra is simply an off-site event organized on the principle of “everything I need, I bring with me,” where the Lavra itself is used as a backdrop, a rented venue.
What is the difference between Dumenko and "Patriarch" Nikodym?
The difference between Dumenko and Kobzar is not in having or not having apostolic succession or spiritual gifts, nor in the depth of their theological knowledge.
Admit you're a Moscow priest – get a deferment
If you declare yourself a "Moscow priest," you are (according to the authorities' assurances) classified as "critically important infrastructure" and given a deferment. If you don't admit it, they force you to renounce your priesthood and go to war.
Why, by inciting hatred against UOC, you are inciting it against Christianity
UOC representatives have long warned the “patriotic confessions” that stirring up hatred toward the Church’s faithful would, in the end, turn against those who lit the fire.
Ukrainian rule of law: Will OCU clerics be jailed only for murder?
Courts hand down sentences to UOC clergy on absurd charges, while the state will not so much as wag a finger at OCU members for open incitement to violence.
Why the Lavra’s patronal feast passed in silence
Since the Lavra was handed over to the OCU, it comes to life only when Serhiy Dumenko is on site.