Are Greeks opening their Patriarch’s eyes to Ukraine?

Mount Athos. Photo: Turnavigator

1. The text is signed by abbots and monastics who are under the jurisdiction of the Phanar and Greece – Churches that have recognised the OCU. Formally, they should not even admit the existence of the UOC, since Patriarch Bartholomew does not recognise it. Nevertheless, they refer to it not as a collection of “eparchies of the Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine” (as the head of the Phanar does) but the Ukrainian Orthodox Church under Metropolitan Onuphry, who is followed by the vast majority of Ukrainian Orthodox Christians (about 24 million).”

2. The UOC is the true Church of Christ because it is undergoing persecution: “Persecution is a sign of the authenticity of Christian life.”

3. They refer to the OCU as the “so-called” Church and note the collaboration of its members with bandits who are seizing UOC churches.

4. The signatories condemn the Ukrainian authorities, who are trying to outlaw the UOC, calling them a state “in the times of Hitler and Stalin”.

5. The text provides details of the seizure of the cathedral in Cherkasy. This shows that Greece and Mount Athos are following the situation in Ukraine closely. And if they know about Cherkasy, they are aware of many other similar cases.

6. The Greeks quote Patriarch Bartholomew’s words about the inadmissibility of violence in churches, specifically in the context of the Church of St. Dionysius in Athens.

And here it is appropriate to recall one of the decisions of the 2018 Synod, by which the Phanar legitimised Filaret, Macarius and their followers: ‘To appeal to all parties involved to refrain from seizing churches, monasteries and other property, as well as from any other violent actions.’

In other words, Patriarch Bartholomew feared that seizures and violence would occur in Ukraine. And if a person fears something, at the very least, they keep an eye on the situation to take action if there are excesses.

All this time, while violence has been directed at the believers of the UOC, the head of the Phanar has remained silent. Let’s even assume that he truly did not know about it. But now, pretending not to see is impossible – his own clerics are opening Patriarch Bartholomew’s eyes.

Will he take steps to correct what he has wrought?

Read also

“Should Bandera's birthday occur…”

Congratulations are posted for Bandera’s birthday on the pages of three popular OCU “priest-bloggers.” However, there are no publications at all dedicated to Basil the Great or to the Feast of the Circumcision.

Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists

In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.

Was the true number of voluntary transfers accidentally revealed in the OCU?

38 clerics out of 2000 "transfers" are about 2%. This is the exact percentage of actual voluntary transitions from the UOC to the OCU demonstrated to us by Serhiy Dumenko.

Opinion polls on the war and Zelensky: a case study in manufactured consent

KIIS polls on church-related issues have long served Dumenko and his circle as convenient “evidence” that the majority of Ukrainians supposedly belong to the OCU.

Seven years of the OCU – what fruits has it borne?

On the anniversary of the event, Dumenko produced a pompous text that appears to have been written in some parallel reality.

Metropolitan Arseniy and the Kremenchuk deputy: what is common?

The example in Kremenchuk is yet another evidence of the authorities' double standards. And we have the right to say that Bishop Arseniy is in the pre-trial detention center not because he committed a crime.