On Zelensky’s statements regarding the "Moscow Patriarchate"
Piers Morgan and Volodymyr Zelensky. Photo: a screenshot from Morgan’s YouTube channel
President Volodymyr Zelensky’s interview with British journalist Piers Morgan, in which he mentioned the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC), left a disturbing impression. Here’s why. Essentially, Zelensky’s comments were a response to Tucker Carlson, the well-known American journalist, who accused him of dictatorial tendencies, including the ban on the UOC. So, what does Zelensky offer in return?
1. The claim that the All-Ukrainian Council of Churches and Religious Organizations (UCCRO) excluded the "Moscow Patriarchate" from its ranks.
The President clearly confused this with UCCRO’s support for the law banning the UOC. This, in itself, is a disgraceful position for Ukraine’s religious denominations, but it does not constitute an expulsion from UCCRO. The official UCCRO website still lists Metropolitan Onuphry as "Metropolitan of Kyiv and All Ukraine." Notably, there is no mention of the "Moscow Patriarchate".
2. The claim that the entire population is against the Moscow Patriarchate, as strange as that may sound.
It is entirely unclear how Zelensky determined this. Did he derive it from the anti-church hysteria in Ukrainian media or from polls funded 90% by the controversial USAID? According to Ukraine’s State Ethnopolitics experts, the UOC has around 6 million believers and thousands of parishes. Has Zelensky simply excluded all these people from the population of Ukraine?
3. The claim that there is a legal connection between the UOC and the ROC: "The Moscow Patriarchate is being closed, there can be no legal connection. They must be a Ukrainian Church, legally in Ukrainian jurisdiction."
The only connection between the UOC and the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) is Eucharistic communion. Legally, the "Moscow Patriarchate" does not exist and never has existed in Ukraine. The UOC has always been and remains under Ukrainian jurisdiction.
This is yet another incorrect statement by the President.
4. The claim that the ban on the UOC is "all lies. That is Putin’s narrative."
But if Zelensky admits that the ban exists and even justifies it, then why does he call it a "Putin's narrative"? What does Putin have to do with this at all?
We acknowledge that the President may not be well-informed on church matters, and it is possible that he has been misled. However, he is now spreading this misinformation worldwide, while simultaneously opposing a massive portion of his own country’s population. Very sad indeed.
Read also
Seizures are transitions, bans are freedom
Such a simple yet deceitful manipulation: if the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) is “Nazi,” then the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) must be the same. And so, let’s ban it. Plus, claims that 80% of Ukrainians support the ban on the UOC.
On Zelensky’s statements regarding the "Moscow Patriarchate"
We acknowledge that the President may not be well-versed in church matters and that he may have been misinformed. However, it turns out that he is spreading this misinformation worldwide.
On denunciations to "authorities" about UOC Diaspora
Two statements have recently appeared almost simultaneously: one from the head of the Uniates, Shevchuk, and another from the OCU cleric Kovalenko, both denouncing the UOC diaspora.
Are Greeks opening their Patriarch’s eyes to Ukraine?
Almost 40 monasteries from Greece and Mount Athos have raised their voices in defence of the UOC. What are the main points of their appeal?
When a politician is closer to God than an "episcopess"
After the inauguration, the President and Vice President of the United States, along with their families, visited the Episcopal Church in Washington, where Bishop Mariann Budde urged Trump to have mercy upon gay, lesbian, and transgender children, because "they fear for their lives."