All Ukrainians are equal before SBU, but some are more equal
Roman Hryshchuk. Photo: Facebook / Hryshchuk
Three UOJ journalists are facing life imprisonment, including charges of "inciting interreligious hatred."
As evidence, they are accused of using words like "radicals," "raiders," "OCU members" and placing quotation marks around the clerical titles of OCU members. This is considered "incitement" – and nothing else.
Now, let’s consider one of countless examples from OCU representatives.
Roman Hryshchuk:
"The UOC are occupiers. A hybrid Putin army, sabotage groups, a propaganda machine with 100 generals, 9,000 officers, and 100,000 rank-and-file members… Their tasks are clear and effective: impose the enemy’s narratives, gather and transmit intelligence, identify and compile lists of patriots, sow despair and doubt about the need to resist the occupation."
Does Hryshchuk provide a single piece of evidence for such serious accusations? Of course not. It is pure falsehood and slander. Moreover, it is a self-serving lie, aimed at furthering his own interests.
Hryshchuk is the leader of a group of itinerant activists from Bukovyna, whose purpose is to "transfer" UOC churches to the OCU – essentially stoking conflict in the region. With statements like this, Hryshchuk is preparing the ground for future takeovers, "correctly" influencing those unfamiliar with church matters.
A person listens to a "respected priest," believes him, and then goes to storm a church belonging to "occupiers" and "saboteurs." And just like that –another hotspot of conflict emerges in the country. Is this good for Ukraine or bad? Basic logic suggests it is bad. But at the SBU, it seems they think otherwise.
Because Hryshchuk faces no consequences. So what if he labels 5-6 million people as enemies? So what if he once again pits Ukrainians against each other? (By the way, comments on Hryshchuk’s Facebook page suggest he does this for money.) No, there are no accusations against him.
But there will be accusations against the UOJ when we report on Hryshchuk’s next "heroic" act and those of his associates.
And this is today’s reality of equality before the law in Ukraine.
Read also
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.
Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra
In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.