On Patriarch Bartholomew's support for "war-peace"

An OUN bond for 200 karbovanets. Photo: PIK

The Patriarch rightly described the deaths and suffering of Ukrainians: "Countless lives have been lost, homes destroyed, and entire communities displaced. Families remain separated, cities lie in ruins, and millions have been forced into exile." One might think that he was leading up to the need for an immediate end to the war.

But no. Immediately, the head of the Phanar states that "true peace cannot be dictated by force or external whims", and goes on to make purely political statements, supporting Zelensky and protesting against being "deceived by false narratives and disinformation".

He does not elaborate on his words, but it’s not difficult to guess that he is referring to Trump’s peace initiatives and Zelensky’s negative response to them.

In other words, while the head of the Phanar uses "peacemaking" rhetoric, he actually supports continued military actions, with all the deaths, suffering, and destruction that entails. Meanwhile, he asserts that the Phanar "will continue to speak the truth, advocate for justice, and stand beside those who suffer".

Thank you, Your All-Holiness, millions of UOC believers have long felt your "advocacy for justice" and "standing those who suffer". They hear your reaction to the churches seized by your militants, and the beating of UOC priests and parishioners.

As for the climax of Bartholomew’s speech, one could consider his quoting the UPA slogan from 70 years ago: "Christ has risen – Ukraine will rise!"

How did the apostles not realize that they should have led the liberation war against the Romans under this slogan? It’s elementary: "Christ has risen – Judea will rise!"

But seriously, Ukraine can only "rise" with an immediate onset of peace and the cessation of deaths. As for the words of a man whom Biden called "his great friend", this is more the speech of a politician than a pastor. And, more specifically, a politician with a specific agenda.

Read also

Will Zelensky agree that his grandfather was “scum”?

Natalia Pipa is one of the authors of a bill seeking to ban the UOC.

116 agreements with the aggressor in year five of war: Who must “sever ties”?

In the fifth year of war with Russia, Ukraine’s authorities have suddenly announced the termination of a number of legal agreements with Russia and the CIS.

Filaret is dead – Zoria is going after Kyiv Patriarchate

After Filaret’s death, OCU spokesman Yevstratiy Zoria has resumed his media assault on his rivals from the Kyiv Patriarchate. Let’s look at his main claims.

Why do the people love Patriarch Ilia so deeply?

What people truly long for is not simply a leader, but a man who stands before God on their behalf – one through whom the light of the divine presence quietly, unmistakably shines. This is the one thing people await from a first hierarch above all else.

Why did no one come for Filaret?

When Filaret – who had been “reinstated in his rank” – died, not a single bishop from any Local Church came to his funeral.

Is this the end of the Kyiv Patriarchate?

The UOC-KP is not protesting the fact that its head will be buried by the OCU.