On Patriarch Bartholomew's support for "war-peace"
An OUN bond for 200 karbovanets. Photo: PIK
The Patriarch rightly described the deaths and suffering of Ukrainians: "Countless lives have been lost, homes destroyed, and entire communities displaced. Families remain separated, cities lie in ruins, and millions have been forced into exile." One might think that he was leading up to the need for an immediate end to the war.
But no. Immediately, the head of the Phanar states that "true peace cannot be dictated by force or external whims", and goes on to make purely political statements, supporting Zelensky and protesting against being "deceived by false narratives and disinformation".
He does not elaborate on his words, but it’s not difficult to guess that he is referring to Trump’s peace initiatives and Zelensky’s negative response to them.
In other words, while the head of the Phanar uses "peacemaking" rhetoric, he actually supports continued military actions, with all the deaths, suffering, and destruction that entails. Meanwhile, he asserts that the Phanar "will continue to speak the truth, advocate for justice, and stand beside those who suffer".
Thank you, Your All-Holiness, millions of UOC believers have long felt your "advocacy for justice" and "standing those who suffer". They hear your reaction to the churches seized by your militants, and the beating of UOC priests and parishioners.
As for the climax of Bartholomew’s speech, one could consider his quoting the UPA slogan from 70 years ago: "Christ has risen – Ukraine will rise!"
How did the apostles not realize that they should have led the liberation war against the Romans under this slogan? It’s elementary: "Christ has risen – Judea will rise!"
But seriously, Ukraine can only "rise" with an immediate onset of peace and the cessation of deaths. As for the words of a man whom Biden called "his great friend", this is more the speech of a politician than a pastor. And, more specifically, a politician with a specific agenda.
Read also
Should the law banning the UOC be repealed?
It turns out that MPs from Batkivshchyna were taking money for “the right” votes. Could the vote for the law banning the UOC also have been “bought”?
Our raider–officials should brace themselves?
Someday the Zelensky era will end. And when it does, there will be plenty of claims to answer for. The war against Orthodoxy will be among the chief indictments.
State and Churches: For Catholics – restitution; for Orthodox – confiscation
Shouldn’t DESS be campaigning for the Kyiv Caves Lavra to be returned to the Church after the Bolsheviks expelled the monks a hundred years ago and turned it into a “museum complex”?
Why the idea of a "national Church" is doomed
According to the most optimistic estimates, the population of Ukraine is now no more than 19 million. The figure is shocking, especially when you remember that at the beginning of independence, 52 million people lived in the country.
"The UOC doesn’t hold funerals for soldiers": a lie-manufacturing machine
At the end of December, a wave of outrage swept across the internet over claims that UOC priests refused to serve a funeral for a fallen soldier in the Bukovynian village of Banyliv-Pidhirnyi. So what actually happened there?
Budanov instead of Yermak: Will anything change for the UOC?
Will the new head of the Presidential Office use the post to wage war against the UOC?