On Patriarch Bartholomew's support for "war-peace"

An OUN bond for 200 karbovanets. Photo: PIK

The Patriarch rightly described the deaths and suffering of Ukrainians: "Countless lives have been lost, homes destroyed, and entire communities displaced. Families remain separated, cities lie in ruins, and millions have been forced into exile." One might think that he was leading up to the need for an immediate end to the war.

But no. Immediately, the head of the Phanar states that "true peace cannot be dictated by force or external whims", and goes on to make purely political statements, supporting Zelensky and protesting against being "deceived by false narratives and disinformation".

He does not elaborate on his words, but it’s not difficult to guess that he is referring to Trump’s peace initiatives and Zelensky’s negative response to them.

In other words, while the head of the Phanar uses "peacemaking" rhetoric, he actually supports continued military actions, with all the deaths, suffering, and destruction that entails. Meanwhile, he asserts that the Phanar "will continue to speak the truth, advocate for justice, and stand beside those who suffer".

Thank you, Your All-Holiness, millions of UOC believers have long felt your "advocacy for justice" and "standing those who suffer". They hear your reaction to the churches seized by your militants, and the beating of UOC priests and parishioners.

As for the climax of Bartholomew’s speech, one could consider his quoting the UPA slogan from 70 years ago: "Christ has risen – Ukraine will rise!"

How did the apostles not realize that they should have led the liberation war against the Romans under this slogan? It’s elementary: "Christ has risen – Judea will rise!"

But seriously, Ukraine can only "rise" with an immediate onset of peace and the cessation of deaths. As for the words of a man whom Biden called "his great friend", this is more the speech of a politician than a pastor. And, more specifically, a politician with a specific agenda.

Read also

On how the OCU scorns its own rent-a-crowd

According to Zoria, the OCU looks down on staged crowds – for them, “what matters is truth, not the number” of parishioners. And yet, for every one of Epifaniy Dumenko’s traveling services, people are bused in by the coachload.

Persecution of UOC and liquidation of UGCC in 1946: Are there parallels?

After the defeat of Nazi Germany and the liberation of Western Ukraine, the leadership of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) initiated negotiations with Soviet authorities concerning the future of its ecclesiastical structure.

On the mobilization of a priest as a sniper

A man who has chosen the path of the priesthood has no right to join the army and take up a weapon. And the very idea of killing another human being is all the more absurd.

On statistics: how many Orthodox, Muslims and Jews we have

Trust in the Razumkov Center's research methods on the topic of Orthodoxy is minimal.

Why helping children with cancer is a threat to state security

We should have long got used to the antics of some MPs, especially those who furiously hate the UOC. But they don't stop surprising us.

Is Ramadan closer to the authorities than Great Lent?

Have Muslims and Jews – who together make up just over one percent of the country’s population – become a privileged class? And yet Ukraine is widely seen as a Christian country.