On Patriarch Bartholomew's support for "war-peace"

An OUN bond for 200 karbovanets. Photo: PIK

The Patriarch rightly described the deaths and suffering of Ukrainians: "Countless lives have been lost, homes destroyed, and entire communities displaced. Families remain separated, cities lie in ruins, and millions have been forced into exile." One might think that he was leading up to the need for an immediate end to the war.

But no. Immediately, the head of the Phanar states that "true peace cannot be dictated by force or external whims", and goes on to make purely political statements, supporting Zelensky and protesting against being "deceived by false narratives and disinformation".

He does not elaborate on his words, but it’s not difficult to guess that he is referring to Trump’s peace initiatives and Zelensky’s negative response to them.

In other words, while the head of the Phanar uses "peacemaking" rhetoric, he actually supports continued military actions, with all the deaths, suffering, and destruction that entails. Meanwhile, he asserts that the Phanar "will continue to speak the truth, advocate for justice, and stand beside those who suffer".

Thank you, Your All-Holiness, millions of UOC believers have long felt your "advocacy for justice" and "standing those who suffer". They hear your reaction to the churches seized by your militants, and the beating of UOC priests and parishioners.

As for the climax of Bartholomew’s speech, one could consider his quoting the UPA slogan from 70 years ago: "Christ has risen – Ukraine will rise!"

How did the apostles not realize that they should have led the liberation war against the Romans under this slogan? It’s elementary: "Christ has risen – Judea will rise!"

But seriously, Ukraine can only "rise" with an immediate onset of peace and the cessation of deaths. As for the words of a man whom Biden called "his great friend", this is more the speech of a politician than a pastor. And, more specifically, a politician with a specific agenda.

Read also

On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak

Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.

Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra

In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.