On the criminal scheme of the OCU in Chernivtsi

Dumenko and Bodoriak. Photo: Firtka

More disgraceful facts are emerging in the case of the "under-the-fence meeting" at the UOC cathedral in Chernivtsi, where on February 16, unknown individuals organized a vote for the transfer of three (!) of the city's main churches, including the cathedral itself, to the OCU. This occurred simultaneously with a legitimate meeting of the religious community inside the cathedral, where thousands of parishioners voted for their faithfullness to the UOC. Similar mass meetings took place at other "transferred" churches.

It would seem that the "transfer" in Chernivtsi is a clear case of fraud and deception. So blatant that even the state-run Suspilne channel has mentioned it. However, after 10 days, all three communities were re-registered with the OCU in the Unified State Register. The owner of these communities is now listed as Yaroslav Bodoriak, also known as the Chernivtsi "bishop" Feognost. For a while, it was unclear who orchestrated this scam, as the authorities in Chernivtsi denied any involvement.

It soon became clear that the re-registration had been carried out in Lviv. Specifically, by Solomiya Hryniv, an official from the Lviv Regional State Administration. And she is no ordinary woman. It turned out that she participates in joint activities with the DESS head, Yelensky. Most importantly, she received a certificate of merit from Dumenko "For Services to the OCU" for her role in the re-registration of UOC communities in the Lviv region, and a joint photo of them was proudly displayed on the official website of Epifaniy’s structure. Currently, Hryniv is a subject of several legal proceedings for her previous "achievements".

This is clearly a corruption-driven criminal scheme with several steps:

1. A fictitious meeting of outsiders is organised to vote for the transfer of three (!) main cathedrals in Chernivtsi to the OCU.

2. Legitimate meetings of UOC religious communities are ignored.

3. An illegal re-registration is carried out by a "friendly" black registrar in another region.

There is no doubt that the next stage will be a forcible seizure of the churches, accompanied by shouting, fighting, and very likely bloodshed. Essentially, this is a provocation for mass disturbances in order to achieve personal gain.

In a country that respects itself, all these people would have long been giving testimonies in the SBU's offices. But today, that is not the case.

One can only hope that tomorrow will be different.

Read also

Lavra as a backdrop for a name-day celebration

Any service held by Epifaniy in the Lavra is simply an off-site event organized on the principle of “everything I need, I bring with me,” where the Lavra itself is used as a backdrop, a rented venue.

What is the difference between Dumenko and "Patriarch" Nikodym?

The difference between Dumenko and Kobzar is not in having or not having apostolic succession or spiritual gifts, nor in the depth of their theological knowledge.

Admit you're a Moscow priest – get a deferment

If you declare yourself a "Moscow priest," you are (according to the authorities' assurances) classified as "critically important infrastructure" and given a deferment. If you don't admit it, they force you to renounce your priesthood and go to war.

Why, by inciting hatred against UOC, you are inciting it against Christianity

UOC representatives have long warned the “patriotic confessions” that stirring up hatred toward the Church’s faithful would, in the end, turn against those who lit the fire.

Ukrainian rule of law: Will OCU clerics be jailed only for murder?

Courts hand down sentences to UOC clergy on absurd charges, while the state will not so much as wag a finger at OCU members for open incitement to violence.

Why the Lavra’s patronal feast passed in silence

Since the Lavra was handed over to the OCU, it comes to life only when Serhiy Dumenko is on site.