On the OCU’s “informing” against Metropolitan Theodosiy
The OCU filed a report against Metropolitan Theodosiy. Photo: open sources
The Cherkasy Eparchy of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) is “deeply outraged” by the lifting of nighttime house arrest for Metropolitan Theodosiy of Cherkasy and has called on “competent authorities to reconsider the case”. Their reasoning is simply shocking – according to the OCU, it is “unacceptable” that the metropolitan is now free to celebrate services wherever he wishes.
Let that sink in – Christians are appealing to state authorities to ban a canonical Orthodox bishop from holding liturgies!
Of course, the OCU claims that the hierarch “openly promotes Russian narratives” and say they are concerned for the “immature minds” of the faithful.
Yet they offer not a single example of such narratives. And that’s no surprise – they don’t exist. What Epifaniy Dumenko and his circle really want is to get rid of a bishop who’s in the way, someone interfering with their ongoing campaign to expropriate churches. In reality, these are the actions of 1990s-style racketeers, doing everything possible to push a “competitor” off their turf.
But the Church is not a business. Calling for the arrest of an innocent man is both vile and disgraceful. And from a Christian perspective – it’s a sign of total unfitness for ministry. A Christian shepherd cannot wish evil upon another. He cannot hinder the celebration of the Liturgy. It’s absurd.
How would we react if a fitness coach told us not to work out, but to lie on the couch eating chips and pastries instead? We’d probably go find a different coach.
And yet in the OCU, these are precisely the kinds of “coaches” and the kind of “training program” on offer. The only question is: what sort of result can one expect at the end of such a program?
Read also
From sanctuary to storage: how seized UOC churches are being repurposed
In Korsun-Shevchenkivskyi, members of the OCU are reportedly using the Church of the Savior Not Made by Hands – seized from the UOC – as a storage site for clothing.
Why can a thief who stole from AFU walk out of SIZO, while Vladyka Arseniy cannot?
A man who stole food from soldiers in wartime is allowed the privilege of freedom, while a hierarch who fed hundreds of destitute refugees in the Lavra is denied even the possibility.
“There are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USSR”
One of the most disgraceful phenomena in the life of Ukraine’s present-day religious community is its complicity in justifying the crackdown on the UOC.
Why people heroize those who beat TRC
Why does the head of the UGCC publicly call for war until victory, while quietly hiding draft-dodging workers in temples? Why do OCU bloggers delete posts supporting the TRC due to massive hate?
On the long-awaited statements by Oleksandr Usyk
Oleksandr Usyk has declared that he is ready to become president. The only question is – whom does he now see as his voters?
Two weeks of OCU’s “brotherhood” talk to UOC: Any fruits yet?
So this is what the OCU’s “dialogue” looks like. One hand signs “appeals” about brotherhood – the other blesses people with angle grinders.