On chaotic moves
The SBU has blocked Bulgarian and American UOJ websites in Ukraine. Photo: UOJ
That such actions violate freedom of speech is too obvious to even warrant discussion. So let’s focus instead on trying to decipher the logic behind the SBU’s decision.
The UOJ sites in Bulgarian and English are clearly intended for audiences in those countries. They publish news and articles relevant to Orthodox believers in Bulgaria and the United States.
And yet, the Ukrainian government blocks them. Not in Bulgaria. Not in the US (perhaps they’d like to, but they don’t have the tools). No – they block them in Ukraine. For what purpose? Are millions of Ukrainians reading in Bulgarian and English? Clearly not.
And why target these two countries in particular? The UOJ currently operates sites in Germany, Greece, Serbia, and even Mount Athos. Why aren’t those being blocked? What’s the logic here?
Does this move somehow make Ukraine safer? Quite the opposite – it tarnishes the country’s image abroad and deals a serious blow to its reputation. Meanwhile, neither Americans nor Bulgarians are affected by the ban. For them, it’s a non-event.
So what was the point?
When a person is suffering from severe food poisoning – or some other kind of toxic reaction – their movements become erratic, uncoordinated, even desperate. The same thing happens when someone is drowning.
Sadly, we’ve been witnessing a similar lack of control in the state’s actions toward the Ukrainian Orthodox Church for some time now. It’s as if someone in power has chosen the Church and its faithful as an enemy – and is now doing everything possible to harm them, oblivious to the fact that they’re also harming their own country: its unity, its credibility, its moral standing.
Let us hope that, as with any form of intoxication, this will eventually pass. And may it end not in collapse – but in recovery.
Read also
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.
Have the talking points on the Sviatohirsk murder already been rolled out?
Espreso gives viewers the unmistakable impression that nothing particularly terrible happened – and that no one should feel too sorry for the “Moscow Patriarchate monks.”
Why are a rabbi and an exarch pleading for corruption suspects?
The rabbi and the exarch are both highly intelligent men and cannot fail to understand that their actions are dealing a serious blow to their reputations. Yet they still went to court. Why?
The Lavra: Who is the master of the house?
Neither the authorities nor the OCU actually need Orthodox churches. What they need is to show who is in charge of them.
On Patriarch Bartholomew's secret meetings with an anathematized person
Patriarch Bartholomew held negotiations with a man whose anathema he himself had officially recognized.