On chaotic moves

The SBU has blocked Bulgarian and American UOJ websites in Ukraine. Photo: UOJ

That such actions violate freedom of speech is too obvious to even warrant discussion. So let’s focus instead on trying to decipher the logic behind the SBU’s decision.

The UOJ sites in Bulgarian and English are clearly intended for audiences in those countries. They publish news and articles relevant to Orthodox believers in Bulgaria and the United States.

And yet, the Ukrainian government blocks them. Not in Bulgaria. Not in the US (perhaps they’d like to, but they don’t have the tools). No – they block them in Ukraine. For what purpose? Are millions of Ukrainians reading in Bulgarian and English? Clearly not.

And why target these two countries in particular? The UOJ currently operates sites in Germany, Greece, Serbia, and even Mount Athos. Why aren’t those being blocked? What’s the logic here?

Does this move somehow make Ukraine safer? Quite the opposite – it tarnishes the country’s image abroad and deals a serious blow to its reputation. Meanwhile, neither Americans nor Bulgarians are affected by the ban. For them, it’s a non-event.

So what was the point?

When a person is suffering from severe food poisoning – or some other kind of toxic reaction – their movements become erratic, uncoordinated, even desperate. The same thing happens when someone is drowning.

Sadly, we’ve been witnessing a similar lack of control in the state’s actions toward the Ukrainian Orthodox Church for some time now. It’s as if someone in power has chosen the Church and its faithful as an enemy – and is now doing everything possible to harm them, oblivious to the fact that they’re also harming their own country: its unity, its credibility, its moral standing.

Let us hope that, as with any form of intoxication, this will eventually pass. And may it end not in collapse – but in recovery.

Read also

Why Epifaniy’s “piety” justifies Patriarch Bartholomew’s hopes

The Phanar is convinced that Dumenko “stands firmly and unshakably on spiritual heights.”

Dumenko’s “dialogue” appeal to the UOC: sincerity or strategy?

If the OCU truly wanted dialogue, it would decide to halt seizures and return what was taken.

Where did the circus go? It was here just yesterday

At an Orthodox Church of Ukraine “service” with Epifaniy (Dumenko) in the seized cathedral in Volodymyr, there are people. But the very next day – without Epifaniy – there are no people.

Why instigators of hatred against the UOC should be in prison

Churches were not built for one state to defeat another, not for the triumph of an “Ukrainian spirit,” and not for the “spirit” of any other nation.

Should His Beatitude commemorate the head of the ROC or not?

Fierce battles are being waged on social media and screens about how Metropolitan Onuphrius should act and how he should not.

Why are the authorities seizing churches and monasteries from the UOC?

Let’s ask a simple question – why does the state drive UOC monasteries and church communities out of their churches? Why does it need Orthodox shrines at all?