On chaotic moves

The SBU has blocked Bulgarian and American UOJ websites in Ukraine. Photo: UOJ

That such actions violate freedom of speech is too obvious to even warrant discussion. So let’s focus instead on trying to decipher the logic behind the SBU’s decision.

The UOJ sites in Bulgarian and English are clearly intended for audiences in those countries. They publish news and articles relevant to Orthodox believers in Bulgaria and the United States.

And yet, the Ukrainian government blocks them. Not in Bulgaria. Not in the US (perhaps they’d like to, but they don’t have the tools). No – they block them in Ukraine. For what purpose? Are millions of Ukrainians reading in Bulgarian and English? Clearly not.

And why target these two countries in particular? The UOJ currently operates sites in Germany, Greece, Serbia, and even Mount Athos. Why aren’t those being blocked? What’s the logic here?

Does this move somehow make Ukraine safer? Quite the opposite – it tarnishes the country’s image abroad and deals a serious blow to its reputation. Meanwhile, neither Americans nor Bulgarians are affected by the ban. For them, it’s a non-event.

So what was the point?

When a person is suffering from severe food poisoning – or some other kind of toxic reaction – their movements become erratic, uncoordinated, even desperate. The same thing happens when someone is drowning.

Sadly, we’ve been witnessing a similar lack of control in the state’s actions toward the Ukrainian Orthodox Church for some time now. It’s as if someone in power has chosen the Church and its faithful as an enemy – and is now doing everything possible to harm them, oblivious to the fact that they’re also harming their own country: its unity, its credibility, its moral standing.

Let us hope that, as with any form of intoxication, this will eventually pass. And may it end not in collapse – but in recovery.

Read also

Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists

In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.

Was the true number of voluntary transfers accidentally revealed in the OCU?

38 clerics out of 2000 "transfers" are about 2%. This is the exact percentage of actual voluntary transitions from the UOC to the OCU demonstrated to us by Serhiy Dumenko.

Opinion polls on the war and Zelensky: a case study in manufactured consent

KIIS polls on church-related issues have long served Dumenko and his circle as convenient “evidence” that the majority of Ukrainians supposedly belong to the OCU.

Seven years of the OCU – what fruits has it borne?

On the anniversary of the event, Dumenko produced a pompous text that appears to have been written in some parallel reality.

Metropolitan Arseniy and the Kremenchuk deputy: what is common?

The example in Kremenchuk is yet another evidence of the authorities' double standards. And we have the right to say that Bishop Arseniy is in the pre-trial detention center not because he committed a crime.

On sausage and milk during the fast

The true meaning of fasting is not gastronomical but spiritual. Yet how many of us can honestly say that during the fast we pray more, refrain from judging anyone, visit hospitals and prisons, and tend to those in distress?