On chaotic moves
The SBU has blocked Bulgarian and American UOJ websites in Ukraine. Photo: UOJ
That such actions violate freedom of speech is too obvious to even warrant discussion. So let’s focus instead on trying to decipher the logic behind the SBU’s decision.
The UOJ sites in Bulgarian and English are clearly intended for audiences in those countries. They publish news and articles relevant to Orthodox believers in Bulgaria and the United States.
And yet, the Ukrainian government blocks them. Not in Bulgaria. Not in the US (perhaps they’d like to, but they don’t have the tools). No – they block them in Ukraine. For what purpose? Are millions of Ukrainians reading in Bulgarian and English? Clearly not.
And why target these two countries in particular? The UOJ currently operates sites in Germany, Greece, Serbia, and even Mount Athos. Why aren’t those being blocked? What’s the logic here?
Does this move somehow make Ukraine safer? Quite the opposite – it tarnishes the country’s image abroad and deals a serious blow to its reputation. Meanwhile, neither Americans nor Bulgarians are affected by the ban. For them, it’s a non-event.
So what was the point?
When a person is suffering from severe food poisoning – or some other kind of toxic reaction – their movements become erratic, uncoordinated, even desperate. The same thing happens when someone is drowning.
Sadly, we’ve been witnessing a similar lack of control in the state’s actions toward the Ukrainian Orthodox Church for some time now. It’s as if someone in power has chosen the Church and its faithful as an enemy – and is now doing everything possible to harm them, oblivious to the fact that they’re also harming their own country: its unity, its credibility, its moral standing.
Let us hope that, as with any form of intoxication, this will eventually pass. And may it end not in collapse – but in recovery.
Read also
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.
Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra
In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.