Baumeister: OCU and UGCC never say if authorities are doing something wrong

Andriy Baumeister. Photo: a screenshot from the Shelest's YouTube channel

Andriy Baumeister. Photo: a screenshot from the Shelest's YouTube channel

Famous Ukrainian philosopher Andriy Baumeister stated in an interview with journalist Oleksandr Shelest about the deep decline of Christianity in Ukraine, emphasizing that neither the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) nor the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) are capable of criticizing the actions of the authorities because they are too close to the state and its policies.

Discussing the silence of confessions regarding the LGBT film festival held during Holy Week and Easter, Baumeister noted that, unfortunately, Ukraine cannot be called an Orthodox country because the UOC is pressured by the state, while the OCU and UGCC are too close to the authorities to contradict them.

“I am very skeptical about our Christianity. As a participant in the religious revival of the late 80s – early 90s, I can say that this is a facade. Mostly a facade,” the philosopher emphasized at the beginning of the conversation.

According to Baumeister, most Ukrainians who consider themselves Orthodox would not be able to pass a “basic exam” on the fundamentals of faith, cannot explain what happens during the liturgy, and are not familiar with the text of the Gospel.

Speaking about the OCU, Baumeister characterized it as an organization created under political pressure, which completely excludes the independence of its leadership.

“The OCU, after all, is a state project. And you understand that this church was created under direct political pressure or, to put it simply, it is politics that created the church. It does not allow the leaders of the OCU the freedom to express what they think, to articulate their concerns publicly in any way,” the philosopher noted.

Regarding the UGCC, Baumeister also expressed a critical position: "The Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, although it has a long and respected history, is also very closely tied to the political system of the state and the prevailing ideas within it. And if, for example, there are any injustices or violations of fundamental rights, the leaders of this church will never speak out about it."

The philosopher particularly emphasized that “the voice of the Church, representatives of the Church never defends the weak, oppressed, or persecuted,” especially when it comes to those who hold views different from the official ones.

In contrast to the situation with the OCU and UGCC, the philosopher expressed respect for the representatives of the UOC, who “fight quite bravely against obvious rights violations,” despite the fact that the Church is “in disgrace” and subjected to constant searches.

Earlier, the UOJ reported that on Good Friday, an LGBT film festival was opened in Kyiv.

Activist targeting UOC lawyers wears clothing with Nazi symbols

Davyd Pshenychnyi, a radical who opposes the UOC, was photographed wearing clothing by Svastone, a brand that describes itself as pagan.

TRC mobilizes 24-year-old UOC hieromonk on his way to study in Athens

Hieromonk Viktor (Denysov), a student at a university in Athens, said he was taken off his flight and brought to a TRC and is now serving with the 8th Special Operations Regiment.

Shevchuk thanks Catholic cardinal for visit to Russia

The UGCC head called Catholic Cardinal Matteo Zuppi’s visit to Ukrainian prisoners held in Russia an extremely important step.

‘Won’t find a girl better than you’: UGCC clergy dance on church porch

In Ternopil, UGCC clergy danced to a wedding song on the steps of a church and tossed candy into the crowd.

Metropolitan Onuphry consecrates Church of Sts. Cosmas and Damian in Kyiv

On the feast day of the “She Who Is Quick to Hear” Icon of the Mother of God, the UOC Primate consecrated a Kyiv church dedicated to the Holy Unmercenaries Cosmas and Damian.

‘This is not how freedom is done’: Met. Theodosiy on secret Phanar report

The Cherkasy hierarch said the Constantinople cleric’s report on the 2018 “council” shows that the fate of “autocephaly” was determined not by the canons but by the authorities and security services.