When the persecution of the Church reaches the level of commissars
Police expelled UOC believers in Cherkasy from their St. Andrew’s Church. Photo: UOJ
Usually, the OCU tries to at least create the illusion of legitimacy, gathering some people to pose as "members of a religious community." Even if those "members" are outright thugs who break jaws and shatter the arms and legs of UOC parishioners – as was the case during the seizures of St. Michael's Cathedral and the Nativity of the Mother of God Monastery in Cherkasy.
But today in Cherkasy, the scene was pure surrealism. The police simply drove the parishioners of St. Andrew's Church off the grounds of their own sanctuary and locked the gates. There was not the slightest sign of any alternative "religious community" of the OCU – none at all.
The UOC parishioners were expelled just to expel them, to make sure they simply were not present in the church. And this is despite the fact that St. Andrew's Church is the property of the Cherkasy Eparchy. Legally, there can be no "transition" to the OCU – absolutely none.
One day, historians will look at these images, scratch their heads, and ask, "How was this even possible? How, in an Orthodox democratic country, could believers be thrown out of their church just like that – so brazenly and lawlessly?" And the less attentive history students might even confuse these images with footage from the Bolshevik persecutions.
Although, perhaps not. The "Soviet" footage was in black and white, while the "Ukrainian" is in color. And that’s the only difference.
Read also
A hint at a new demographic reality?
It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.