Why does OCU cleric serve on an antimins from Patriarch Kirill?
Filiuk serving on an antimins from the Patriarch of the Russian Church. Photo: Filiuk's Instagram
A popular online “priest-blogger” from the Ternopil region, Oleksii Filiuk, accidentally revealed in a video that he is serving on an antimins signed by Patriarch Kirill.
Yet not long ago, in an interview with national media, he claimed that only the “brainwashed” attend the “Moscow Church” where “they give drugs instead of Communion”.
Such statements are common among OCU members, including Dumenko himself. For them, the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church is a heretic, a supporter of Putin, a propagandist of the “Russian world”, and in general – an enemy.
The OCU publicly blames UOC clergy for even mythical ties to Patriarch Kirill. Meanwhile, they themselves serve on his antimins. How can this be explained?
The church shown in the video is not named by Filiuk, but the inscriptions inside are in Ukrainian. It was originally built by the OCU, the UOC-KP, or the UAOC. The antimins, however, was clearly taken from one of the seized UOC churches. In other words, Filiuk brought it into his church deliberately. But why?
Even before the Tomos, some “priests” from the UOC-KP and UAOC would secretly bring their children to be baptized in the UOC, not fully trusting in their own grace.
It seems the same is happening here. Did Filiuk want a touch of “canonicity”?
We see no other explanation.
Read also
Zelensky's revoked order: What kind of heroes should Ukrainians have?
In recent years, the Ukrainian authorities have sought to present members of the OUN-UPA as heroes for all Ukrainians.
Religious processions banned – gay parades allowed
The authorities “respect rights, freedom, and human dignity” for many: Jews, pop and rock music fans, and now homosexuals. But Orthodox Christians are not among them.
Lavra's Dormition Cathedral and the money
While the construction of the entire cathedral cost approximately $12.5–13 million, more than $11.1 million is now being sought for its restoration. And that is only the “starting” figure.
Strike on the Lavra: what will the consequences be?
No one is saying that a strike on the Lavra, the portion of the Mother of God, is a level of absurdity beyond all limits – that after destroying hundreds of Orthodox churches, the war has now reached the very heart of our Orthodoxy.
Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?
If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the Ukrainian authorities’ destruction of UOC churches? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?
How Epifaniy became a successor of the "occupier"
From the OCU's perspective, Bishop Ioann was the living embodiment of the very “spiritual occupation” of Ukraine and the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra that they now claim to be heroically fighting against.