OCU: To steal and seize

In Zabolottia, chaplains and men in camouflage beat one of the parishioners. Photo: UOJ

In recent months, the epicenter of church seizures targeting the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) has shifted to Bukovina. Nearly every week, in one village or another, we witness attacks and violence orchestrated by the same traveling "chaplain corps" of OCU clergy, led by Roman Hryshchuk. Sometimes they are reinforced by radical militants from the Ivano-Frankivsk region. Lately, however, even these aren’t needed – the police now provide the muscle for church raids.

The scheme is always the same.

Stage One: The "chaplain corps" arrives in a village with a crowd to stage a vote on transferring the local church to the OCU. Sometimes they manage to find a few local supporters – a dozen or two – but often they rely entirely on outsiders. The real parish community is barred from the vote.

Stage Two: Forged documents concerning the supposed "transfer" are handed over to corrupt registrars, who promptly re-register the parish under the OCU.

Stage Three: The “chaplains” launch a violent assault or break in during the night – depending on the local UOC community’s resistance.

And here one has to wonder – what does any of this have to do with the law?

By law, it is the members of a specific church community – those who regularly confess, commune, and participate in parish life – who gather and decide whether or not to change jurisdiction.

But in video footage from villages across Bukovina (and beyond), we see a very different picture: parishioners defending their church from complete outsiders, who arrive with angle grinders, knives, bolt cutters, crowbars, and other tools, attempting to force entry into churches to which they have absolutely no connection.

Clergy – or at least, people in cassocks – are seen punching and kicking believers, throwing them to the ground, and engaging in other acts of violence utterly unthinkable for anyone claiming to be a clergyman.

Were it not for today’s political climate, we might say outright that these individuals have nothing to do with the priesthood – they are simply thugs and street gangs in robes. But given that even a sidelong glance at the OCU can now result in treason charges, we will refrain.

On the other hand, it may be appropriate here to recall Richard Patterson’s famous “duck test”:
“If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck – then it probably is a duck.”

Read also

Should the law banning the UOC be repealed?

It turns out that MPs from Batkivshchyna were taking money for “the right” votes. Could the vote for the law banning the UOC also have been “bought”?

Our raider–officials should brace themselves?

Someday the Zelensky era will end. And when it does, there will be plenty of claims to answer for. The war against Orthodoxy will be among the chief indictments.

State and Churches: For Catholics – restitution; for Orthodox – confiscation

Shouldn’t DESS be campaigning for the Kyiv Caves Lavra to be returned to the Church after the Bolsheviks expelled the monks a hundred years ago and turned it into a “museum complex”?

Why the idea of a "national Church" is doomed

According to the most optimistic estimates, the population of Ukraine is now no more than 19 million. The figure is shocking, especially when you remember that at the beginning of independence, 52 million people lived in the country.

"The UOC doesn’t hold funerals for soldiers": a lie-manufacturing machine

At the end of December, a wave of outrage swept across the internet over claims that UOC priests refused to serve a funeral for a fallen soldier in the Bukovynian village of Banyliv-Pidhirnyi. So what actually happened there?

Budanov instead of Yermak: Will anything change for the UOC?

Will the new head of the Presidential Office use the post to wage war against the UOC?