UOC clergy as “cannon fodder”?
Military recruitment raid. Photo: Censor
On a single day – June 11 – the Territorial Recruitment Centers (TRCs) abducted two UOC clergymen to send them to the front:
In Kremenets, Archimandrite Paphnutius, abbot of the Holy Spirit Hermitage of the Pochaiv Lavra
In the village of Viliya, Fr. Oleksandr, rector of the Church of St. Paraskeva.
The cynicism is staggering: on the very same day, Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal instructed the head of the State Service for Ethnopolitics and Freedom of Conscience (Viktor Yelensky) to “accelerate deferments” for clergy. He stated that the government was supposedly “taking steps toward the churches and continuing to support religious organizations.”
Just days earlier, the State Service published a list of 7,726 religious organizations eligible for deferment. The 9,222 UOC communities located in government-controlled territory were excluded.
Why? Because their statutes allegedly fail to comply with the 2018 Law No. 2662-VIII “On Renaming Religious Organizations.”
And yet, those same “noncompliant” statutes are being used as grounds to investigate the UOC for affiliation with Moscow under the 2024 Law No. 3894.
In other words, when it comes to deferment, UOC statutes are invalid – but when it comes to persecution, they’re good enough.
A perfect illustration of the old saying: “The law is like a wagon shaft – it turns wherever you bend it.”
But what’s even more astonishing is this: for years, state propaganda has declared that UOC clergy and bishops are collaborators, FSB agents, Moscow's minions.
Yelensky himself has stated that he sees the UOC as a “threat to national security.”
That’s why they’re barred from serving as chaplains in the Armed Forces – so they don’t “corrupt” the soldiers.
And yet, somehow, there’s no concern about “national security” when these same alleged “FSB agents” are forcibly sent to the front with weapons in hand.
Everyone knows full well that the priesthood forbids a clergyman from bearing arms. And even if they are forced to take a weapon, they will not shoot –let alone kill.
All they can do at the front… is die.
OCU propagandist Tetiana Derkach summed up this absurdity in a single phrase:
“They’re not allowed into the army as chaplains, but as cannon fodder – they must be there.”
And in this one sentence lies the essence of how today’s government views the clergy of the canonical Church:
Join the OCU – or be sent to die.
Read also
On how the OCU scorns its own rent-a-crowd
According to Zoria, the OCU looks down on staged crowds – for them, “what matters is truth, not the number” of parishioners. And yet, for every one of Epifaniy Dumenko’s traveling services, people are bused in by the coachload.
Persecution of UOC and liquidation of UGCC in 1946: Are there parallels?
After the defeat of Nazi Germany and the liberation of Western Ukraine, the leadership of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) initiated negotiations with Soviet authorities concerning the future of its ecclesiastical structure.
On the mobilization of a priest as a sniper
A man who has chosen the path of the priesthood has no right to join the army and take up a weapon. And the very idea of killing another human being is all the more absurd.
On statistics: how many Orthodox, Muslims and Jews we have
Trust in the Razumkov Center's research methods on the topic of Orthodoxy is minimal.
Why helping children with cancer is a threat to state security
We should have long got used to the antics of some MPs, especially those who furiously hate the UOC. But they don't stop surprising us.
Is Ramadan closer to the authorities than Great Lent?
Have Muslims and Jews – who together make up just over one percent of the country’s population – become a privileged class? And yet Ukraine is widely seen as a Christian country.