UOC clergy as “cannon fodder”?
Military recruitment raid. Photo: Censor
On a single day – June 11 – the Territorial Recruitment Centers (TRCs) abducted two UOC clergymen to send them to the front:
In Kremenets, Archimandrite Paphnutius, abbot of the Holy Spirit Hermitage of the Pochaiv Lavra
In the village of Viliya, Fr. Oleksandr, rector of the Church of St. Paraskeva.
The cynicism is staggering: on the very same day, Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal instructed the head of the State Service for Ethnopolitics and Freedom of Conscience (Viktor Yelensky) to “accelerate deferments” for clergy. He stated that the government was supposedly “taking steps toward the churches and continuing to support religious organizations.”
Just days earlier, the State Service published a list of 7,726 religious organizations eligible for deferment. The 9,222 UOC communities located in government-controlled territory were excluded.
Why? Because their statutes allegedly fail to comply with the 2018 Law No. 2662-VIII “On Renaming Religious Organizations.”
And yet, those same “noncompliant” statutes are being used as grounds to investigate the UOC for affiliation with Moscow under the 2024 Law No. 3894.
In other words, when it comes to deferment, UOC statutes are invalid – but when it comes to persecution, they’re good enough.
A perfect illustration of the old saying: “The law is like a wagon shaft – it turns wherever you bend it.”
But what’s even more astonishing is this: for years, state propaganda has declared that UOC clergy and bishops are collaborators, FSB agents, Moscow's minions.
Yelensky himself has stated that he sees the UOC as a “threat to national security.”
That’s why they’re barred from serving as chaplains in the Armed Forces – so they don’t “corrupt” the soldiers.
And yet, somehow, there’s no concern about “national security” when these same alleged “FSB agents” are forcibly sent to the front with weapons in hand.
Everyone knows full well that the priesthood forbids a clergyman from bearing arms. And even if they are forced to take a weapon, they will not shoot –let alone kill.
All they can do at the front… is die.
OCU propagandist Tetiana Derkach summed up this absurdity in a single phrase:
“They’re not allowed into the army as chaplains, but as cannon fodder – they must be there.”
And in this one sentence lies the essence of how today’s government views the clergy of the canonical Church:
Join the OCU – or be sent to die.
Read also
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.
Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra
In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.
Why has the Culture Ministry not been banned yet?
There are numerous traitors and collaborators within the Ministry of Culture, the Verkhovna Rada, and the SBU. Yet for some reason, only the UOC is labeled “pro-Moscow.”