UOC clergy as “cannon fodder”?
Military recruitment raid. Photo: Censor
On a single day – June 11 – the Territorial Recruitment Centers (TRCs) abducted two UOC clergymen to send them to the front:
In Kremenets, Archimandrite Paphnutius, abbot of the Holy Spirit Hermitage of the Pochaiv Lavra
In the village of Viliya, Fr. Oleksandr, rector of the Church of St. Paraskeva.
The cynicism is staggering: on the very same day, Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal instructed the head of the State Service for Ethnopolitics and Freedom of Conscience (Viktor Yelensky) to “accelerate deferments” for clergy. He stated that the government was supposedly “taking steps toward the churches and continuing to support religious organizations.”
Just days earlier, the State Service published a list of 7,726 religious organizations eligible for deferment. The 9,222 UOC communities located in government-controlled territory were excluded.
Why? Because their statutes allegedly fail to comply with the 2018 Law No. 2662-VIII “On Renaming Religious Organizations.”
And yet, those same “noncompliant” statutes are being used as grounds to investigate the UOC for affiliation with Moscow under the 2024 Law No. 3894.
In other words, when it comes to deferment, UOC statutes are invalid – but when it comes to persecution, they’re good enough.
A perfect illustration of the old saying: “The law is like a wagon shaft – it turns wherever you bend it.”
But what’s even more astonishing is this: for years, state propaganda has declared that UOC clergy and bishops are collaborators, FSB agents, Moscow's minions.
Yelensky himself has stated that he sees the UOC as a “threat to national security.”
That’s why they’re barred from serving as chaplains in the Armed Forces – so they don’t “corrupt” the soldiers.
And yet, somehow, there’s no concern about “national security” when these same alleged “FSB agents” are forcibly sent to the front with weapons in hand.
Everyone knows full well that the priesthood forbids a clergyman from bearing arms. And even if they are forced to take a weapon, they will not shoot –let alone kill.
All they can do at the front… is die.
OCU propagandist Tetiana Derkach summed up this absurdity in a single phrase:
“They’re not allowed into the army as chaplains, but as cannon fodder – they must be there.”
And in this one sentence lies the essence of how today’s government views the clergy of the canonical Church:
Join the OCU – or be sent to die.
Read also
When every UOC church in Lviv Region is shut down – is that “freedom of faith”?
In Galicia, the authorities have effectively outlawed the UOC and are hunting down “underground” services – while in the United States they solemnly insist that no one in Ukraine is persecuted for their faith.
Why Epifaniy’s “piety” justifies Patriarch Bartholomew’s hopes
The Phanar is convinced that Dumenko “stands firmly and unshakably on spiritual heights.”
Dumenko’s “dialogue” appeal to the UOC: sincerity or strategy?
If the OCU truly wanted dialogue, it would decide to halt seizures and return what was taken.
Where did the circus go? It was here just yesterday
At an Orthodox Church of Ukraine “service” with Epifaniy (Dumenko) in the seized cathedral in Volodymyr, there are people. But the very next day – without Epifaniy – there are no people.
Why instigators of hatred against the UOC should be in prison
Churches were not built for one state to defeat another, not for the triumph of an “Ukrainian spirit,” and not for the “spirit” of any other nation.
Should His Beatitude commemorate the head of the ROC or not?
Fierce battles are being waged on social media and screens about how Metropolitan Onuphrius should act and how he should not.