Should the UOC ban the Metropolitan of Luhansk from ministry?
Metropolitan Panteleimon of Luhansk. Photo: Press Service of the Luhansk Eparchy
Metropolitan Panteleimon of Luhansk was sentenced in absentia to 11 years in prison for “collaborating with the Rashists.” The judges justified the verdict by saying he attended a meeting in the Kremlin to legitimize the seizure of Ukrainian territories, gave interviews to Russian media, and endorsed the occupation of Ukraine, etc. But no details or evidence were provided to us.
But this is not about whether the verdict itself was just. We want to draw attention to a related part of the ruling – that the hierarch is banned from “holding any positions in religious organizations for 13 years.”
Patriotic social media pages are already claiming that now the UOC Synod is obliged to remove him from his see and prohibit him from serving. But is that really true? The issue here is not that we support Metropolitan Panteleimon’s non-ecclesiastical activities. The problem lies elsewhere.
Let’s set aside the political and ecclesiastical context and imagine a purely hypothetical situation: law enforcement catches and arrests the Metropolitan of Luhansk, he serves his sentence, and is released. What should the UOC Synod do? Follow the court ruling, strip him of his see, and ban him from ministry for 13 years? But under the country’s highest law – the Constitution – Church and state are separate. How can the state dictate to the Church who may serve as priest or bishop and who may not?
We live in a country where one denomination is openly called a “state attribute” and has its interests promoted abroad, while another is threatened with a ban over canonical (!) ties. Meanwhile, certain religious figures render services to the government by justifying its actions internationally.
Perhaps, in fact, Ukraine is no longer a secular state?
Read also
Zelensky's revoked order: What kind of heroes should Ukrainians have?
In recent years, the Ukrainian authorities have sought to present members of the OUN-UPA as heroes for all Ukrainians.
Religious processions banned – gay parades allowed
The authorities “respect rights, freedom, and human dignity” for many: Jews, pop and rock music fans, and now homosexuals. But Orthodox Christians are not among them.
Lavra's Dormition Cathedral and the money
While the construction of the entire cathedral cost approximately $12.5–13 million, more than $11.1 million is now being sought for its restoration. And that is only the “starting” figure.
Strike on the Lavra: what will the consequences be?
No one is saying that a strike on the Lavra, the portion of the Mother of God, is a level of absurdity beyond all limits – that after destroying hundreds of Orthodox churches, the war has now reached the very heart of our Orthodoxy.
Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?
If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the Ukrainian authorities’ destruction of UOC churches? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?
How Epifaniy became a successor of the "occupier"
From the OCU's perspective, Bishop Ioann was the living embodiment of the very “spiritual occupation” of Ukraine and the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra that they now claim to be heroically fighting against.