MP: Bartholomew granted Tomos on condition of no seizures and hostility

Rostyslav Pavlenko at a meeting with Patriarch Bartholomew. Photo: Pavlenko's Facebook

MP Rostyslav Pavlenko, who oversaw the track of obtaining the Tomos, shared details of Poroshenko's negotiation process with Patriarch Bartholomew.

According to him, Poroshenko instructed him to start working with the Phanar at the end of 2014. In 2015, Petro Poroshenko wrote a letter to Patriarch Bartholomew "with a request to use his unique status in the Orthodox world and grant this status to the Ukrainian church". Pavlenko claims that this year "a slightly different scenario could have been implemented, where the UOC-KP and UAOC were supposed to announce their unification at the Council."

"This Church could have received recognition from the Ecumenical Patriarch and negotiated as equals with the UOC-MP about further unification," Pavlenko stated and lamented that this scenario did not work out due to the vagaries of the UAOC reps.

But in 2016, Pavlenko recounts, Poroshenko and Patriarch Bartholomew agreed on a new attempt. According to him, the Patriarch asked for "some signals to come from Ukraine". As such signals, the authorities organized an appeal from the Rada to the Phanar. And after the Council of Crete, Pavlenko "went again to the Ecumenical Patriarch with a letter from President Poroshenko, where it was clearly stated what specific steps we are asking from the Ecumenical Patriarchate".

The MP assured that the failure of the Council of Crete, which the ROC and several other Churches did not attend, "the Ecumenical Patriarch perceived as a personal affront," and the negotiations "significantly intensified".

According to Pavlenko, before the final stage of negotiations, Patriarch Bartholomew set several conditions.

"If we decide to grant the Tomos, it will only be if we understand: first – it will contribute to the welfare of the Ukrainian people; second – it will not cause a real religious war, because one of the Russians’ arguments was: ‘That’s it, a war will start here, a nightmare. There is already a war, you started it, and now the war will really begin.’ Representatives of the Ecumenical Patriarchate had to be convinced that this war would not happen. And third – that it will be a path of unification," Pavlenko conveyed the Patriarch's words.

He explained that Poroshenko assured the Phanar that everything would be exactly as the Patriarch wanted.

"Therefore, it was so important for the transitions of parishes to begin, for the process of unification to start. And then the state had to support this process, not leave it to chance," Pavlenko said.

He also assured that Poroshenko did not pay Patriarch Bartholomew for the Tomos, but simply supplied the Phanar with his sweets.

Earlier, the UOJ wrote that Patriarch Bartholomew justified the Tomos for the OCU with an ecological agenda.

Read also

Members of the AUCCRO told the European Commissioner about two Maidan movements

In Brussels, the AUCCRO delegation assured the European Commissioner that the Ukrainian people had definitively chosen the “European path.”

The Odessa Diocese showed how they revived from ruins a church seized by the OCU

The Odessa Diocese of the UOC published archival footage of the abandoned shrine, which believers had been raising from ruins for years.

In Britain, Evangelical Alliance urges Christians to preach among Muslims

British evangelicals urged Christians to stop fearing Islam and begin seeing migrants as a “mission field.”

Khmelnytskyi Eparchy delivers 20 tons of aid to hospitals and social institutions

Volunteers distributed a large humanitarian shipment among 16 medical and social institutions in the Khmelnytskyi region.

UGCC head blames Russia for tensions between Poland and Ukraine

Shevchuk claimed that Moscow is financing radical parties across Europe in an effort to undermine solidarity between Warsaw and Kyiv.

Priest to Dumenko: What are your fruits? Tears, fights, and forged documents?

A UOC cleric responded to statements by OCU head Epiphany Dumenko about the “restoration” of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra.