And who exactly are the “sanctioners”?
A meeting of the NSDC. Photo: Umerov’s Facebook
On 13 November, Zelensky signed an NSDC decree imposing sanctions on businessmen Tymur Mindich and Oleksandr Zukerman, both of whom appear in a major corruption case.
Mindich is Zelensky’s long-time partner from “Kvartal 95” and, as the media claim, his long-time close friend.
The sanctions were imposed for only three years (the standard term is ten). At the same time, Mindich and Zukerman are listed in the document as citizens of Israel, meaning their Ukrainian assets are unaffected.
It is worth recalling that these men are accused of stealing hundreds of millions of dollars in the energy and defense sectors – at a time when Ukrainians spend hours without electricity and the front lacks weapons.
Meanwhile, in recent months Zelensky has imposed sanctions on hierarchs, priests, and even journalists essentially for the mere fact of belonging to the UOC – and without any leniency.
Equally noteworthy is the composition of the body imposing the sanctions. In the section “Members of the NSDC,” the officials listed right after Zelensky – R. Umerov, H. Halushchenko, S. Hrynchuk – are themselves figures in the very NABU investigation that has already resulted in sanctions against Mindich and Zukerman.
Court rulings are still ahead, of course, but based on the recordings provided by NABU, it is fair to say that these individuals have, at the very least, far from impeccable reputations. At most – they may be involved in stealing sums from the people that an ordinary person can hardly imagine.
And these are the people who made the decision to sanction representatives of the UOC.
One of Griboedov’s characters uttered a line that became proverbial: “And who are the judges?” In our case, it can be updated slightly: “And who are the sanctioners?”
Read also
The UGCC “сan survive persecution” – unless it happens to someone else
The current situation surrounding the UOC is no different from what the Uniates themselves experienced after the Lviv Council.
Was a UOC сhurch in Ivano-Frankivsk demolished for the sake of a park?
The authorities in Ivano-Frankivsk have decided to create a park on the vacant lot at 6 Chornovola Street. On the surface, the decision looks utterly routine. In reality, it says a great deal.
The devolution of Metropolitan Simeon
According to Shostatsky, “we know that where the majority is, there is the truth – not where the minority is.”
On how the OCU scorns its own rent-a-crowd
According to Zoria, the OCU looks down on staged crowds – for them, “what matters is truth, not the number” of parishioners. And yet, for every one of Epifaniy Dumenko’s traveling services, people are bused in by the coachload.
Persecution of UOC and liquidation of UGCC in 1946: Are there parallels?
After the defeat of Nazi Germany and the liberation of Western Ukraine, the leadership of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) initiated negotiations with Soviet authorities concerning the future of its ecclesiastical structure.
On the mobilization of a priest as a sniper
A man who has chosen the path of the priesthood has no right to join the army and take up a weapon. And the very idea of killing another human being is all the more absurd.