On Constantinople Patriarchate’s decision to honor head of organized crime group

The reception of Petrovsky and Arutiunian at the Phanar. Photo: Press Service of the Ecumenical Patriarchate

Metropolitan Arsenios of Austria (Kardamakis) has awarded Alexander Petrovskyi, a major sponsor of the OCU, the highest distinction of the Metropolis – the “Golden Cross.” And as a bonus, he brought Petrovskyi and his business partner Arutiunian to an audience with Patriarch Bartholomew, where they discussed new projects to support the Ecumenical Patriarchate.

According to Metropolitan Arsenios, such an honor was bestowed on Petrovskyi “for all his donations to this day, and for his willingness to help and support us in the future.” The hierarch even went so far as to call the businessman “our Archon.”

And here one cannot help but marvel. The title of Archon is certainly not handed out to just anyone; it is reserved for the most respected and pious laypeople whose service to the Church is truly distinguished. Alexander Petrovskyi and Emil Arutiunian, with all due respect, hardly seem to fit such definitions.

Former Interior Minister Lutsenko once claimed that Petrovskyi, “known in certain circles as ‘Narik’,” appeared in Ministry of Internal Affairs files as the leader of an organized crime group. The same applies to Arutiunian, who is known in similar “business ventures” as “Emil.”

So how appropriate is it to call such individuals Archons and bring them into close proximity with the Ecumenical Patriarch? Is the mere fact of regular donations really enough?

Of course, one might object that Petrovskyi and Arutiunian, like the Good Thief, have repented, reconsidered their lives, and now devote themselves entirely to the Church. Yet certain recent facts – both open and not-so-open – make this rather doubtful. It seems far more plausible that, through a sudden burst of piety, the new benefactors are purchasing reputations and entrance into high society. And we cannot exactly condemn them for that; business has its own rules.

The real questions here concern the hierarchs of the Ecumenical Patriarchate and their regard for their own reputation.

In 2018, they called individuals with no valid ordination “bishops” and received them into Eucharistic communion. Now they grant awards, bestow the title of “Archon,” and bring close to themselves men with deeply questionable backgrounds.

The ancient Greek dramatist Euripides is credited with the words: “Tell me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are.”

Even more to the point is the Apostle Paul’s warning to the Corinthians: “Do not be deceived: Bad company corrupts good morals.”

A line written, it seems, as though expressly for the Ecumenical Patriarchate.

Read also

DESS: We protect Muslims but ignore the UOC

The authorities rush to shield a small group of Muslims – many of them from other ethnic backgrounds – yet they demonstratively ignore the harassment of millions of Orthodox Ukrainians.

From sanctuary to storage: how seized UOC churches are being repurposed

In Korsun-Shevchenkivskyi, members of the OCU are reportedly using the Church of the Savior Not Made by Hands – seized from the UOC – as a storage site for clothing.

Why can a thief who stole from AFU walk out of SIZO, while Vladyka Arseniy cannot?

A man who stole food from soldiers in wartime is allowed the privilege of freedom, while a hierarch who fed hundreds of destitute refugees in the Lavra is denied even the possibility.

“There are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USSR”

One of the most disgraceful phenomena in the life of Ukraine’s present-day religious community is its complicity in justifying the crackdown on the UOC.

Why people heroize those who beat TRC

Why does the head of the UGCC publicly call for war until victory, while quietly hiding draft-dodging workers in temples? Why do OCU bloggers delete posts supporting the TRC due to massive hate?

On the long-awaited statements by Oleksandr Usyk

Oleksandr Usyk has declared that he is ready to become president. The only question is – whom does he now see as his voters?