On Constantinople Patriarchate’s decision to honor head of organized crime group
The reception of Petrovsky and Arutiunian at the Phanar. Photo: Press Service of the Ecumenical Patriarchate
Metropolitan Arsenios of Austria (Kardamakis) has awarded Alexander Petrovskyi, a major sponsor of the OCU, the highest distinction of the Metropolis – the “Golden Cross.” And as a bonus, he brought Petrovskyi and his business partner Arutiunian to an audience with Patriarch Bartholomew, where they discussed new projects to support the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
According to Metropolitan Arsenios, such an honor was bestowed on Petrovskyi “for all his donations to this day, and for his willingness to help and support us in the future.” The hierarch even went so far as to call the businessman “our Archon.”
And here one cannot help but marvel. The title of Archon is certainly not handed out to just anyone; it is reserved for the most respected and pious laypeople whose service to the Church is truly distinguished. Alexander Petrovskyi and Emil Arutiunian, with all due respect, hardly seem to fit such definitions.
Former Interior Minister Lutsenko once claimed that Petrovskyi, “known in certain circles as ‘Narik’,” appeared in Ministry of Internal Affairs files as the leader of an organized crime group. The same applies to Arutiunian, who is known in similar “business ventures” as “Emil.”
So how appropriate is it to call such individuals Archons and bring them into close proximity with the Ecumenical Patriarch? Is the mere fact of regular donations really enough?
Of course, one might object that Petrovskyi and Arutiunian, like the Good Thief, have repented, reconsidered their lives, and now devote themselves entirely to the Church. Yet certain recent facts – both open and not-so-open – make this rather doubtful. It seems far more plausible that, through a sudden burst of piety, the new benefactors are purchasing reputations and entrance into high society. And we cannot exactly condemn them for that; business has its own rules.
The real questions here concern the hierarchs of the Ecumenical Patriarchate and their regard for their own reputation.
In 2018, they called individuals with no valid ordination “bishops” and received them into Eucharistic communion. Now they grant awards, bestow the title of “Archon,” and bring close to themselves men with deeply questionable backgrounds.
The ancient Greek dramatist Euripides is credited with the words: “Tell me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are.”
Even more to the point is the Apostle Paul’s warning to the Corinthians: “Do not be deceived: Bad company corrupts good morals.”
A line written, it seems, as though expressly for the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
Read also
Advocatus diaboli: when falsehood becomes a virtue
Listening to the rhetoric of Shevchuk and his UCCRO colleagues, one cannot help but think of the famous film starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves – the one in which Reeves’s character discovers that he has been working as an attorney for the devil.
Authorities “open” the Far Caves – whatever they do, nothing works for them
The authorities and the OCU are straining every nerve to make everything look properly “churchlike” – every bit as respectable as under the “Moscow priests.” Yet all they ever produce is a parody with a distinctly Bolshevik stench.
Athonite monks at Dumenko’s Lavra “service”
OCU benefactors paid for the visit of a magnificent Byzantine choir led by the Archon Protopsaltis of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
When building a church is banned – is that “freedom of faith”?
In Nychehivka, the authorities unlawfully halted construction of a UOC church on private land.
Mobilizing UOC clergy: Are the authorities simply purging “Moscow priests”?
UOC clerics – unlike those of the OCU, UGCC, Jews, Muslims, and pagans – are granted no exemptions.
Will those who praised the Nazis be included in Ukraine's Pantheon of Heroes?
It may prove difficult to argue that people who sent greetings to Hitler and praised the Nazi army do not fall under Ukraine’s laws condemning Nazism.