On statistics: how many Orthodox, Muslims and Jews we have
Head of the OP Budanov lighting the menorah. Photo: JCC
The court sociological "Razumkov Center" published statistics on the confessional sympathies of Ukrainians for 2025, as well as a review of 25 years of research. The introductory word to the study was written by the DESS head Viktor Yelensky.
The figures were not surprising. 42.1% of the population identify themselves with the OCU, and only 5.4% with the UOC. Among those who call themselves Orthodox, the figures are 72.2% versus 9.3% respectively. At the same time, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church is referred to in the study as the "Moscow Patriarchate". Even if we believe that the poll figures are correct, it is hard to imagine a person who, when communicating with sociologists, would affirmatively answer whether he associates himself with Moscow. Therefore, trust in the research methods of the Razumkov Center on the topic of Orthodoxy is minimal.
Nevertheless, let us make a brief analysis. The declared gap between the number of OCU and UOC believers is 8 times. Accordingly, we should see a difference in services. Either there should be many times more OCU churches than UOC churches, or OCU churches should be overcrowded with parishioners. As we know, there is neither one nor the other. Moreover, the situation is the opposite. The UOC, despite mass seizures, still has more churches than Dumenko's structure, and the services of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church have far more parishioners.
And yet there are figures in the statistics that look plausible.
• After the formation of the OCU in 2018, the number of those who identify themselves as Orthodox sharply decreased from 67% to 58%. And this despite the fact that all previous years this figure was constant. That is, receiving the Tomos not only did not add interest in Orthodoxy, but gave the opposite effect. This is thought to be related to the intrusive propaganda of the authorities and church seizures.
• The number of Uniates over 25 years of research has grown by half from 7.6% to 11.8%. If we believe the sociologists, there are twice as many of them today as UOC believers(!)
• The figures for denomanations to which the authorities show unprecedented attention are also interesting: Jews and Muslims. According to the Center's data, 0.0% identify themselves as Jews (in 2000 it was 0.3%), and 0.0% as Muslims (in 2000 it was 0.7%).
But our top leadership lights menorahs, congratulates the people on Ramadan and attends iftars.
Probably, conclusions are hardly necessary. Everyone can make them on their own.
Read also
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.
Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra
In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.