Is this the end of the Kyiv Patriarchate?

Police outside Filaret’s residence on the day of his death. Photo: UOJ

The OCU has announced that it will conduct Filaret’s funeral service, even though Denysenko himself wrote something entirely different in his will. Yet there has been no protest from the Kyiv Patriarchate – not even a comment.

Why Dumenko is pushing the matter is clear enough: they are demonstrating that no UOC-KP exists anymore, and that Filaret belongs to the OCU, whatever he himself may previously have said.

But beyond the reputational dimension, there are also property and financial considerations: the residence in central Kyiv on Chykalenko Street (formerly Pushkinska), St. Volodymyr’s Cathedral, and the cash assets as well. According to sources, Dumenko is now taking control of all of it.

Several police and National Guard vehicles are stationed outside the residence. But there are no clashes, and the street remains quiet.

It looks like the UOC-KP is finished.

Read also

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.

Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra

In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.

"I don't celebrate Easter, I'm out of politics"

Unchurched people today are completely disoriented.

Why has the Culture Ministry not been banned yet?

There are numerous traitors and collaborators within the Ministry of Culture, the Verkhovna Rada, and the SBU. Yet for some reason, only the UOC is labeled “pro-Moscow.”