Why did no one come for Filaret?
The funeral service for Filaret at St. Volodymyr’s Cathedral. Photo: OCU
Today, March 22, saw the burial of Patriarch Ilia of Georgia and of Filaret Denysenko, whom the Patriarch of Constantinople “canonically reinstated” to office eight years ago.
In Tbilisi, the primates and hierarchs of almost all the Local Churches were present, including those of Constantinople. In Kyiv, there was no one. And that raises an obvious question – why?
Let us recall that, according to the position of the Churches of Constantinople, Greece, Alexandria, and Cyprus, Filaret was a canonical hierarch, and not just any hierarch, but one of long standing, distinction, and authority. By their own logic, his stature was entirely comparable to that of Patriarch Ilia.
And so the question becomes unavoidable – why was there no one in Kyiv today from any of those Churches?
Of course, it would have been difficult to expect Patriarch Bartholomew to forgo his trip to Georgia. But surely Constantinople could have sent one of its own bishops. The other “Greek” Churches, too, could have sent representatives to Kyiv.
No one came.
And yet for years we were lectured, insistently and at length, about the need to “return” those who had been cast out for “political reasons” to the Orthodox family.
Well, they were returned. And not just anyone, but the “Metropolitan of Kyiv” – even if a former one. But when he came to his repose, not one bishop, not one priest, was sent to bid him farewell. So where, then, is this “Orthodox family”?
It was all in Tbilisi.
We often read the Gospel as though it were some abstract text, detached from the confusions and contradictions of our own day. But in fact it contains the answer to every one of our questions and bewilderments.
“By their fruits ye shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?” Even unbelievers know these words of Christ. But in 2018, certain learned men decided that, according to the latest findings of their science, it was apparently quite possible to graft a thornbush onto a vine.
And when the time came to gather the harvest, they simply pretended they had forgotten all about their experiment.
Read also
How Epifaniy became a successor of the "occupier"
From the OCU's perspective, Bishop Ioann was the living embodiment of the very “spiritual occupation” of Ukraine and the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra that they now claim to be heroically fighting against.
Ukraine’s court religions: conscience or LGBT?
“Moscow priests” will be branded not only for refusing to join the OCU and for following the Julian calendar, but also for “homophobia.”
Does Patriarch Bartholomew consider Ukrainians bearers of the "Russian World"?
The Primate of the Church of Constantinople arrived in Vilnius to introduce the newly appointed Exarch of Lithuania, Bishop Panaretos of Tamasos.
A lesson for the modern Church from the depths of ages
St. Leontius had no desire whatsoever to be “one of their own” for the local authorities or non-believers.
How the UOC Council in Feofania was turned into a “lawless gathering”
All the insults hurled at the Council – claims that it was a “mob gathering,” “filth,” “foam,” and the like – rest not on canons or facts, but solely on the emotions of those making them.
What kind of Ukraine are we moving toward?
Ukrainian authorities are now openly admitting that the country is facing a demographic catastrophe and that there are already not enough people left to fill the workforce.