Why did no one come for Filaret?

The funeral service for Filaret at St. Volodymyr’s Cathedral. Photo: OCU

Today, March 22, saw the burial of Patriarch Ilia of Georgia and of Filaret Denysenko, whom the Patriarch of Constantinople “canonically reinstated” to office eight years ago.

In Tbilisi, the primates and hierarchs of almost all the Local Churches were present, including those of Constantinople. In Kyiv, there was no one. And that raises an obvious question – why?

Let us recall that, according to the position of the Churches of Constantinople, Greece, Alexandria, and Cyprus, Filaret was a canonical hierarch, and not just any hierarch, but one of long standing, distinction, and authority. By their own logic, his stature was entirely comparable to that of Patriarch Ilia.

And so the question becomes unavoidable – why was there no one in Kyiv today from any of those Churches?

Of course, it would have been difficult to expect Patriarch Bartholomew to forgo his trip to Georgia. But surely Constantinople could have sent one of its own bishops. The other “Greek” Churches, too, could have sent representatives to Kyiv.

No one came.

And yet for years we were lectured, insistently and at length, about the need to “return” those who had been cast out for “political reasons” to the Orthodox family.

Well, they were returned. And not just anyone, but the “Metropolitan of Kyiv” – even if a former one. But when he came to his repose, not one bishop, not one priest, was sent to bid him farewell. So where, then, is this “Orthodox family”?

It was all in Tbilisi.

We often read the Gospel as though it were some abstract text, detached from the confusions and contradictions of our own day. But in fact it contains the answer to every one of our questions and bewilderments.

“By their fruits ye shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?” Even unbelievers know these words of Christ. But in 2018, certain learned men decided that, according to the latest findings of their science, it was apparently quite possible to graft a thornbush onto a vine.

And when the time came to gather the harvest, they simply pretended they had forgotten all about their experiment.

Read also

UOC vs. OCU numbers: pollsters count, social media recount

Official polling suggests Dumenko’s structure has an overwhelming lead in the number of parishioners, while social media polls paint a very different picture. Which should we believe?

Who is working for the Kremlin in Poland? OCU, Uniates and Catholics versions

Who in the conflict between Poland and Ukraine is "an agent of the Russian Federation"? Zelensky, who gave the UPA name to an AFU special operations center? Nawrocki, who stripped him of an order for it? Polish MEPs?

Can we judge those who joined the OCU from the military commissariat?

There are many known cases where priests and deacons of the UOC, detained by TRC officers, were offered a simple way to secure their release – to switch to the OCU. Most refused.

On Rivne Metropolitan's excuse for service in Jerusalem

If today we consider it possible to make excuses for concelebrating with the ROC, what will we have to justify tomorrow?

UOC isn’t banned, just ‘de-Russified’? Neither was UGCC under Stalin then

By Shevchuk’s logic, Stalin never banned the UGCC or curtailed freedom of conscience – he merely “freed” the souls of the Uniates from Bandera ideology.

A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”

Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”